全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

短债长用与全要素生产率
Funding Long-Term Projects with Short-Term Debts and Total Factor Productivity

DOI: 10.12677/fia.2024.136131, PP. 1032-1044

Keywords: 短债长用,全要素生产率,融资约束,非效率投资
Funding Long-Term Projects with Short-Term Debts
, Total Factor Productivity, Financing Constraints, Inefficient Investment

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

企业短债长用是指资产期限与负债期限不匹配。在我国,企业运用短期贷款来进行长期的投资,是一种常见的投融资行为。本文利用2008~2022年中国A股上市公司的数据,探究了企业短债长用行为与全要素生产率之间的关系。通过研究,得出结论:企业若持续采取以短期资金来支持长期投资这一财务策略,会对企业的全要素生产率产生显著的抑制效果。本文把短债长用作为核心解释变量,证实其通过增加企业融资约束和非效率投资影响全要素生产率。深入探究发现,短债长用与全要素生产率的消极影响存在一定的企业异质性,即在非国有企业、非高新技术企业和高融资成本企业中更为明显。
The funding long-term projects with short-term debts refers to a mismatch between the maturity of assets and liabilities. In China, it is a common financing and investment behavior for enterprises to use short-term loans for long-term investments. This paper utilizes data from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2022 to explore the relationship between the behavior of funding long-term projects with short-term debts and total factor productivity. After conducting thorough research, we have arrived at the conclusion that the continued adoption of a financial strategy by enterprises to fund long-term projects with short-term debts significantly impedes their total factor productivity. In this paper, we use the practice of funding long-term projects with short-term debts as the primary explanatory variable and demonstrate its influence on TFP through heightened corporate financing constraints and inefficient investments. A deeper dive into the analysis uncovers that the adverse impact of funding long-term projects with short-term debts on TFP exhibits specific enterprise heterogeneity, manifesting more prominently in non-state-owned enterprises, non-high-tech enterprises, and those with elevated financing costs.

References

[1]  Fan, J.P.H., Titman, S. and Twite, G. (2011) An International Comparison of Capital Structure and Debt Maturity Choices. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 47, 23-56.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109011000597
[2]  HE, Z. and Xiong, W. (2012) Rollover Risk and Credit Risk. The Journal of Finance, 67, 391-430.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01721.x
[3]  刘海明, 步晓宁. 民营企业债务违约是内因驱动吗?——基于短贷长投和多元化经营视角的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2022(3): 79-95.
[4]  刘任重, 刘冬冬, 胡白杨. 金融错配与全要素生产率研究——基于2007-2014年上市公司的实证分析[J]. 天津商业大学学报, 2016, 36(4): 8-13.
[5]  罗宏, 贾秀彦, 陈小运. 审计师对短贷长投的信息识别——基于审计意见的证据[J]. 审计研究, 2018(6): 65-72.
[6]  张洁, 唐洁. 资本错配、融资约束与企业研发投入——来自中国高新技术上市公司的经验证据[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(20): 103-111.
[7]  刘晓光, 刘元春. 杠杆率、短债长用与企业表现[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(7): 127-141.
[8]  盛明泉, 任侨, 鲍群. “短贷长投”与全要素生产率关系研究[J]. 亚太经济, 2020(1): 116-126+152.
[9]  何光辉, 杨咸月. 融资约束对企业生产率的影响——基于系统GMM方法的国企与民企差异检验[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2012, 29(5): 19-35.
[10]  肖文, 薛天航. 劳动力成本上升、融资约束与企业全要素生产率变动[J]. 世界经济, 2019, 42(1): 76-94.
[11]  孙凤娥. “短贷长投”是企业的被迫行为吗?——基于管理者过度自信的视角[J]. 财经论丛, 2019(6): 73-82.
[12]  刘帷韬, 任金洋, 冯大威, 等. 经济政策不确定性、非效率投资与企业全要素生产率[J]. 经济问题探索, 2021(12): 13-30.
[13]  钟凯, 程小可, 张伟华. 货币政策适度水平与企业“短贷长投”之谜[J]. 管理世界, 2016(3): 87-98+114+188.
[14]  Kaplan, S.N. and Zingales, L. (1997) Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 169-215.
https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555163
[15]  Richardson, S. (2006) Over-Investment of Free Cash Flow. Review of Accounting Studies, 11, 159-189.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-006-9012-1
[16]  卜洁文, 汤龙, 李光武. 短贷长投、数字普惠金融与企业全要素生产率[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 40(5): 120-140.
[17]  刘丽娜, 郭威. 短贷长投、会计信息质量与企业投资效率[J]. 财会月刊, 2023, 44(10): 50-57.
[18]  郑红, 海玉珍, 喻懋, 等. 短贷长投、内部控制与企业绩效[J]. 上海金融, 2021(2): 71-79.
[19]  刘行, 叶康涛, 陆正飞. 加速折旧政策与企业投资——基于“准自然实验”的经验证据[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2019, 18(1): 213-234.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133