|
家事纠纷案件的类型化研究
|
Abstract:
本文旨在探讨家事纠纷案件类型化处理的必要性及其实践应用。研究首先明确家事纠纷案件的类型分布,进而分析类型化视角下家事纠纷诉讼机制的应用路径。通过对国内外家事纠纷案件类型化处理模式的比较考察,本文揭示了我国家事纠纷案件类型化立法与实务的桎梏,并提出了相应的改进建议。研究认为,通过类型化处理,可以有效提升家事纠纷解决的效率和公正性,进而实现家事纠纷的有效解决。
The purpose of this paper is to explore the necessity and practical application of family dispute cases. Firstly, the distribution of family dispute cases is clarified, and then the application path of family dispute litigation mechanism from the perspective of typology is analyzed. Through a comparative investigation of the typological treatment models of family dispute cases at home and abroad, this paper reveals the shackles of the typological legislation and practice of civil dispute cases in China, and puts forward corresponding suggestions for improvement. It is concluded that the efficiency and fairness of family dispute resolution can be effectively improved through typological treatment, and the effective resolution of family disputes can be realized.
[1] | 刘敏. 论我国民事诉讼法修订的基本原理[J]. 法律科学(西北政法学院学报), 2006, 24(4): 147-154. |
[2] | Webe, M. (2014) The Methodology of the Social Sciences (Translated and Edited by Shils, E.A. and Finchr, H.A.). The Free Press, 22. |
[3] | 刘明生. 家事诉讼事件与家事非讼事件之区分——从家事事件程序基本原则之观点考察[J]. 月旦法学杂志, 2014(227): 191-192. |
[4] | 白绿铉. 日本新民事诉讼法[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2000: 145. |
[5] | 葛义才. 非讼事件法论[M]. 台北: 中国台北三民书局, 2005: 6-8. |
[6] | 陈爱武. 家事诉讼程序: 徘徊在制度理性与实践理性之间[J]. 江海学刊, 2014(2): 140-148. |
[7] | 许少波. 家事纠纷类型化分析[J]. 江海学刊, 2014(3): 133-142. |
[8] | 陈磊. 诉讼法理与非讼法理交错下的共有物分割诉讼[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(3): 135-143. |
[9] | 陈爱武. 论家事案件的类型化及其程序法理[J]. 法律适用, 2017(19): 54-60. |
[10] | 范愉. 非诉讼纠纷解决机制研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2000: 96-97. |
[11] | 谭振亚, 黄晨. 专业化背景下家事审判机构之重构——以司法人员分类管理改革为视角[M]//陈苇, 陈彬, 主编. 中国家事审判改革暨家事法修改理论与实务研究. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 2018: 27. |
[12] | 熊文钊. 现代行政法原理[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2000: 480. |