全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

一流本科课程建设实践——“三维九法”课程设计探索
Practice in Developing First-Class Undergraduate Courses—Exploring the “Three-Dimensional Nine-Method” Curriculum Design Approach

DOI: 10.12677/ces.2024.1212858, PP. 48-57

Keywords: 一流本科课程,课程改革创新,高质量教学,本科人才培养
First-Class Undergraduate Courses
, Curriculum Reform and Innovation, High-Quality Teaching, Undergraduate Talent Cultivation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

在当前的教育改革背景下,一流本科课程建设已成为国内众多高等教育机构发力的重点。高等教育的质量直接关联着未来人才的培养与国家发展的需求。课程作为教学的核心要素,其设计和实施在不断提升学生学术能力的同时,也面临来自教育环境结构上的种种挑战。特别是在区域发展水平参差不齐及教学资源配置不均衡的大背景下,目前高校的课程体系尚存在非系统性的局面,教学方法可能显得单一且缺乏创新,而课程评价体系更多倾向于重视结果,忽略了对学习过程审视的重要性。对此,该研究采用西部X高校具体案例,提出了“三维九法”课程观。研究团队基于学生为中心的教育原则,利用多元思维途径,对课程体系、教学方法以及课程评价等关键方面进行了创新设计。“三维九法”注重新型教学策略的设计与实施,依托九种精心规划的方法论,旨在推广教学实践的全面拓展、灵活应变及准确审视。经验总结表明,“三维九法”在实施三年后,在多个维度上显著提升了教学质量。在课程设计方面,有效提高了学生的学业水平,增强学生参与学科竞赛的能力;拓展了学生的国际视野和社会服务参与途径;持续提升学生学习成绩;并加强了一流本科课程在教育领域的整体评价与社会认可。此外,“三维九法”实施所带来的正面反馈还包含了促进教师教学方法的更新与创新,以及对教学资源进行合理化的分配。“三维九法”呈现了课程设计与教学方法的创新,为高质量本科课程的发展定向提供经验探索,为一流课程建设提供实践启示。
In recent years, with the continuous promotion of first-class undergraduate curriculum construction, many domestic universities have formed a curriculum design mechanism that focuses on teaching quality and achieved remarkable results. However, due to the differences in regional development level and the unbalanced allocation of teaching resources, this process is still faced with challenges such as insufficient system of curriculum structure, overly rigid teaching methods, and a curriculum evaluation system that emphasizes results while ignoring process. In this regard, this study takes the first-class undergraduate curriculum construction practice of a university in western China as an example, and proposes a “three dimensions and nine methods” curriculum concept. It advocates student-centered, diversified thinking, and innovative design in the three key dimensions of curriculum system, teaching methods, and curriculum evaluation, in order to achieve higher teaching effectiveness and optimize learning experience. Specifically, the “three dimensions and nine methods” curriculum concept advocates promoting the comprehensiveness, flexibility, and accuracy of teaching practice through nine well-planned methodologies. After three years of practice, the effectiveness of the “three dimensions and nine methods” has been significantly verified in many aspects. Specifically, the curriculum design based on this curriculum concept has had a positive impact on improving students’ performance in subject competitions, broadening channels for social service participation, promoting students’ achievements, and strengthening the overall evaluation and recognition of first-class undergraduate courses. In

References

[1]  杨捷, 闫羽. 当前我国一流本科课程建设研究的计量分析与展望[J]. 中国大学教学, 2022(5): 4-12, 22.
[2]  Wang, K. (2020) Research on the Significance, Characteristics and Path of China’s Construction of First-Class Undergraduate Education. 2020 4th International Conference on Advancement of the Theory and Practices in Education, Madrid, 4-6 December 2020, 93-98.
[3]  He, C. and Dong, S. (2022) On the Construction Standard of First-Class Undergraduate Courses. Learning & Education, 10, 25-28.
[4]  陆小虎. 应用型本科财务管理教学研究[J]. 现代商贸工业, 2016, 37(34): 415-416.
[5]  吴远征, 倪杰, 沈皆希. 应用型本科高校创新创业教育生态系统的构建与实践路径[J]. 教育与职业, 2024(2): 105-112.
[6]  Hongjuan, S. (2018) How First-Class Undergraduate Education Reform in the United States Can Inform the Development of Double First Class Education in China. Chinese Education & Society, 51, 282-293.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2018.1481640
[7]  黄晓兵, 韩磊磊. 大学生参与课堂教学质量网上评价状况实证分析[J]. 高教发展与评估, 2010, 26(1): 37-40, 42.
[8]  吕达. 教师课程观至关重要——评苏强的《教师课程观研究》[J]. 课程∙教材∙教法, 2017, 37(6): 126-127.
[9]  刘璐, 辛宝忠. 现代大学课程与教学的变革——基于大数据时代的知识观[J]. 中国电化教育, 2017(11): 125-128, 133.
[10]  杨昕, 孙晶. 基于要素的课程体系构建方法与应用——以应用型高等艺术类大学的课程体系构建方法为研究对象[J]. 中国大学教学, 2023(6): 76-82, 96.
[11]  张瀚文. 魅力课堂与教学真相: 基于本科讲授法教学的案例研究[J]. 重庆高教研究, 2023, 11(6): 77-89.
[12]  王战军, 常琅. 规训与超越: 交叉学科建设的制度困境及其突破[J]. 高等教育研究, 2022, 43(5): 26-34.
[13]  齐鑫, 张晓梅. 地方本科院校工商管理专业教学改革探讨[J]. 教育探索, 2015(7): 91-93.
[14]  朱俊华, 杨锐. 创业型大学认识的中国特征、内在矛盾与未来期待——基于文献、政策、实证的三维证据[J]. 高等教育研究, 2022, 43(2): 42-55.
[15]  刘献君, 赵彩霞. 在融合中生长: 应用型人才培养路径探索[J]. 高等教育研究, 2022, 43(1): 79-85.
[16]  杜鑫, 陈敏, 魏署光. 学业成功学生是如何学习的——基于课程学习行为序列的分析[J]. 高等教育研究, 2022, 43(2): 81-89.
[17]  贺武华. 推进高质量人才培养体系建设呼唤学生立场[J]. 教育发展研究, 2023, 43(23): 3.
[18]  Huang, B., Hew, K.F. and Lo, C.K. (2018) Investigating the Effects of Gamification-Enhanced Flipped Learning on Undergraduate Students’ Behavioral and Cognitive Engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 27, 1106-1126.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1495653
[19]  李振华, 胡宇梁, 楼向雄. 基于游戏化学习理念的翻转课堂教学[J]. 实验技术与管理, 2018, 35(6): 162-165.
[20]  Yelamarthi, K., Drake, E. and Prewett, M. (2016) An Instructional Design Framework to Improve Student Learning in a First-Year Engineering Class. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 15, 195-222.
https://doi.org/10.28945/3617
[21]  吴振谦, 钟才明, 殷金曙, 等. 基于活动理论的泛在化实践教学平台的构建和实证[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2020, 68(6): 194-200.
[22]  林小英, 陈向明. 不同的视角 不同的声音——教师和学生对大学本科课程的看法[J]. 高等教育研究, 2002, 23(4): 84-89.
[23]  蔡红红, 王思遥. 评估结果何以影响学科后续建设成效——工作资源与教师工作要求的中介作用[J]. 高等教育研究, 2022, 43(1): 37-47.
[24]  Qi, H., Kui, X. and Chen, Z. (2020) Teaching Practice and Exploration of Compiling Principles under the Background of First-Class Curriculum Construction. 2020 15th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), Delft, 18-22 August 2020, 129-132.
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccse49874.2020.9201777

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133