全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

论算法的法律属性与算法决策的规范路径
On the Legal Attributes of Algorithms and the Regulatory Pathways for Algorithmic Decision-Making

DOI: 10.12677/ds.2024.1012468, PP. 12-18

Keywords: 算法,算法决策,法律规制
Algorithm
, Algorithmic, Decision-Making

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

数字社会以算法为核心、以网络平台为载体,其中的个人信息因此具有了可计算性,即算法识别性。本论文旨在研究数字法学的核心,即算法的相关问题。随着算法在各个领域的广泛应用和持续发展,算法决策对个人权益、公平性和社会秩序等方面产生了重要影响。本文将探讨算法的法律属性以及算法决策的规范路径,分析现行法律框架中的不足,并提出完善法律规制的建议,以确保算法决策的公正、透明和可解释性。
Some scholars have noted that in the digital society, algorithms are at the core, and network platforms serve as the main carriers, giving personal information a calculable nature, known as algorithmic identifiability. This paper aims to examine the core issues of digital jurisprudence, specifically those related to algorithms. With the widespread application and continuous development of algorithms across various fields, algorithmic decision-making has significant impacts on individual rights, fairness, and social order. This paper will explore the legal attributes of algorithms and the regulatory pathways for algorithmic decisions, analyze the shortcomings in the current legal framework, and propose recommendations to improve legal regulations to ensure the fairness, transparency, and interpretability of algorithmic decision-making.

References

[1]  张恩典. 数字时代版权的算法实施: 类型、困境及法律规制[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 45(5): 35-49.
[2]  刘艳红. 人工智能法学研究的反智化批判[J]. 东方法学, 2019(12): 119-126.
[3]  王志成. 数字法学中算法法律性质最优解[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 43(4): 139-148.
[4]  张欣. 从算法危机到算法信任: 算法治理的多元方案和本土化路径[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2019, 22(6): 17-30.
[5]  蔡星月. 算法决策权的异化及其矫正[J]. 政法论坛, 2021, 39(5): 25-37.
[6]  宋亚辉. 网络市场规制的三种模式及其适用原理[J]. 法学, 2018(10): 81-94.
[7]  唐林垚. “脱离算法自动化决策权”的虚幻承诺[J]. 东方法学, 2020(6): 18-33.
[8]  侯东德. 算法自动化决策的属性、场域与风险规制[J]. 学术研究, 2022(8): 36-44, 177.
[9]  彭诚信. 数字法学的前提性命题与核心范式[J]. 中国法学, 2023(1): 85-106.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133