South Korea has experienced drought cycles every 5 to 7 years since 1970, with a severe drought lasting five years from 2013 to 2018. To prepare for these recurring drought risks, the South Korean government deliberated and approved a comprehensive drought response plan in August 2017. As part of this plan, research on a national-scale drought vulnerability assessment and the development of a drought vulnerability map was initiated to enhance proactive drought response measures. The objective of this study is to develop a methodology for assessing drought vulnerability, conduct a nationwide drought vulnerability evaluation, and visualize the results through a drought vulnerability map to assist in decision-making and information sharing. The drought vulnerability assessment was based on the water supply capacity of regional water systems under different scenarios, with exposure, sensitivity, and secondary water resource capacity quantified and weighted in the evaluation. As a result of conducting a drought vulnerability assessment on 250 municipalities nationwide, regions that rely primarily on river or groundwater source for water intake were found to be more vulnerable to drought than those supplied by dams. Furthermore, municipalities located along the east coast, where rivers tend to be steep and short, exhibited higher vulnerability to drought.
References
[1]
Joint Ministries (2021) The First National Water Management Master Plan (in Korean).
[2]
Lee, J., Jang, H., Kim, J. and Kim, T. (2015) Quantitative Characterization of Historical Drought Events in Korea—Focusing on Drought Frequency Analysis in the Five Major Basins. Journal of the Korean Water Resources Association, 48, 1011-1021. https://doi.org/10.3741/jkwra.2015.48.12.1011
[3]
Joint Ministries (2020) Abnormal Climate Report (in Korean).
[4]
Kumar, R. (2008) Studies on Assessment of Vulnerability to Drought. National Institute of Hydrology, India.
[5]
Jordaan, A.J., Sakulski, D. and Jordaan, A.D. (2012) Drought Risk Assessment for Extensive Farming in the Northern Cape Province. Doctoral Dissertation, University of the Free State.
[6]
Fu, X., Svoboda, M., Tang, Z., Dai, Z. and Wu, J. (2013) An Overview of US State Drought Plans: Crisis or Risk Management? Natural Hazards, 69, 1607-1627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0766-z
[7]
Ganapuram, S., Nagarajan, N. and Balaji, V. (2013) Village-Level Drought Vulnerability Assessment Using Geographic Information System (GIS). International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 3, 1-10.
[8]
Blauhut, V., Gudmundsson, L. and Stahl, K. (2015) Towards Pan-European Drought Risk Maps: Quantifying the Link between Drought Indices and Reported Drought Impacts. Environmental Research Letters, 10, Article 014008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/014008
[9]
Naumann, G., Barbosa, P., Garrote, L., Iglesias, A. and Vogt, J. (2014) Exploring Drought Vulnerability in Africa: An Indicator Based Analysis to Be Used in Early Warning Systems. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18, 1591-1604. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1591-2014
[10]
Rajsekhar, D., Singh, V.P. and Mishra, A.K. (2015) Integrated Drought Causality, Hazard, and Vulnerability Assessment for Future Socioeconomic Scenarios: An Information Theory Perspective. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120, 6346-6378. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022670
[11]
IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Aduptation and Vulnerability: Working Group 2 Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
[12]
Perrin, C., Michel, C. and Andréassian, V. (2003) Improvement of a Parsimonious Model for Streamflow Simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 279, 275-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(03)00225-7
