This study analyzes the impact of accounting standards convergence on cross-border investment decisions. The research reviews the theoretical foundations of accounting standards convergence, including information economics, agency theory, and institutional theory. Through systematic analysis, the study constructs a theoretical framework for how accounting standards convergence influences cross-border investment decisions. The research finds that accounting standards convergence may affect cross-border investment decisions through multiple theoretical mechanisms: based on information asymmetry theory, standards convergence can reduce information disparities between investors and investee companies, facilitating investment decisions; according to transaction cost theory, standards convergence lowers information processing costs for financial statement users, benefiting cross-border investment; from an institutional theory perspective, standards convergence provides a unified institutional environment for cross-border investment, reducing uncertainty caused by institutional differences. The study also points out the complexities of the impact of standards convergence on cross-border investment, such as differences in standards implementation quality and cultural influences. To address these complexities, the study proposes a multi-level analytical framework that considers country characteristics and institutional environments. The research also explores the interaction between standards convergence and other economic factors (such as corporate governance and legal systems), providing directions for future research.
References
[1]
Armstrong, C. S., Barth, M. E., Jagolinzer, A. D., & Riedl, E. J. (2010). Market Reaction to the Adoption of IFRS in Europe. The Accounting Review, 85, 31-61. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.1.31
[2]
Ball, R. (2006). International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Pros and Cons for Investors. Accounting and Business Research, 36, 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2006.9730040
[3]
Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Lang, M. H. (2008). International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46, 467-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2008.00287.x
[4]
Beugelsdijk, S., & Frijns, B. (2010). A Cultural Explanation of the Foreign Bias in International Asset Allocation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34, 2121-2131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.01.020
[5]
Brochet, F., Jagolinzer, A. D., & Riedl, E. J. (2013). Mandatory IFRS Adoption and Financial Statement Comparability. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30, 1373-1400. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12002
[6]
Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2013). Mandatory IFRS Reporting and Changes in Enforcement. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56, 147-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.10.007
[7]
Daske, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Verdi, R. (2008). Mandatory IFRS Reporting around the World: Early Evidence on the Economic Consequences. Journal of Accounting Research, 46, 1085-1142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2008.00306.x
[8]
DeFond, M., Hu, X., Hung, M., & Li, S. (2011). The Impact of Mandatory IFRS Adoption on Foreign Mutual Fund Ownership: The Role of Comparability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51, 240-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.02.001
[9]
Gray, S. J. (1988). Towards a Theory of Cultural Influence on the Development of Accounting Systems Internationally. Abacus, 24, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.1988.tb00200.x
[10]
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations. Sage Publications.
[11]
Judge, W., Li, S., & Pinsker, R. (2010). National Adoption of International Accounting Standards: An Institutional Perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18, 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00798.x
[12]
Khurana, I. K., & Michas, P. N. (2011). Mandatory IFRS Adoption and the U.S. Home Bias. Accounting Horizons, 25, 729-753. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50075
[13]
Odin, M., Aduda, J. A., & Omari, C. O. (2023). Numerical Approximation of Information-Based Model Equation for Bermudan Option with Variable Transaction Costs. Journal of Mathematical Finance, 13, 89-111. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmf.2023.131006
[14]
Pruthi, T., & Koul, S. (2019). BRICS: Information Asymmetry in Primary Equity Markets. Theoretical Economics Letters, 9, 1817-1833. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2019.96116
[15]
Ra, C., & Lee, H. (2018). XBRL Adoption, Information Asymmetry, Cost of Capital, and Reporting Lags. iBusiness, 10, 93-118. https://doi.org/10.4236/ib.2018.103006
[16]
Ramanna, K., & Sletten, E. (2014). Network Effects in Countries’ Adoption of IFRS. The Accounting Review, 89, 1517-1543. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50717
[17]
Soderstrom, N. S., & Sun, K. J. (2007). IFRS Adoption and Accounting Quality: A Review. European Accounting Review, 16, 675-702. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180701706732
[18]
Wang, J. (2016). Cross-Border Investment and Financing Reforms in Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone. Journal of Financial Risk Management, 5, 94-100. https://doi.org/10.4236/jfrm.2016.52010