|
论行政诉讼调解的现实困境与完善路径——以实质性化解行政争议为目标
|
Abstract:
随着社会发展的剧烈转型,公民依法维权的意识不断提升,我国行政争议日益增多。以行政争议实质性化解为目标,结合当前行政诉讼调解的司法实践与困境,提出规制“调解 + 撤诉”的结案方式、适当扩大行政诉讼调解的适用范围、建立调审分离的模式、加强对行政诉讼调解监督与救济的建议,从而优化行政诉讼调解制度的运行,推动法治建设广惠民生的时代使命。
With the drastic transformation of social development, the consciousness of citizens’ rights protection according to law continues to improve, and the administrative disputes in our country are increasing day by day. Aiming at the substantive resolution of administrative disputes and combining with the current judicial practice and dilemma of administrative litigation mediation, this paper puts forward some suggestions on regulating “mediation + withdrawal”, appropriately expanding the scope of application of administrative litigation mediation, establishing the mode of separation of mediation and trial, and strengthening supervision and relief of administrative litigation mediation, so as to optimize the operation of administrative litigation mediation system. The mission of the Times is to promote the construction of the rule of law and benefit the people.
[1] | 王万华. 行政复议法的修改与完善——以“实质性解决行政争议”为视角[J]. 法学研究, 2019, 41(5): 99-117. |
[2] | 章剑生. 行政诉讼“解决行政争议”的限定及其规则——基于《行政诉讼法》第1条展开的分析[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2020, 23(4): 93-104. |
[3] | 薛清兰. 行政诉讼调解制度必要性及问题浅析[J]. 经济师, 2021(12): 77. |
[4] | 张一雄. 多元纠纷解决背景下我国行政诉讼调解制度之构建[J]. 江海学刊, 2018(6): 219-223. |
[5] | 江必新, 梁风云. 行政诉讼法理论与实务[M]. 第3版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2016: 1189. |
[6] | 陈瑞华. 论检察机关的法律职能[J]. 政法论坛, 2018, 36(1): 3-17. |