全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

人工智能行政决策法治化研究
Research on the Rule of Law of Artificial Intelligence Administrative Decision-Making

DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2024.1211943, PP. 6639-6646

Keywords: 行政决策,人工智能,数字政府
Administrative Decision-Making
, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Government

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

迈进数字化新纪元,人工智能为行政决策领域带来了技术革新,提升了决策效率和决策的科学、民主与合法性,也为防范权力滥用、助力数字政府建设贡献了力量。然而,人工智能行政决策并非尽善尽美。其自动化、复杂性和模糊性特点有时会导致智能决策与公民权益产生冲突,削弱决策者主导权,甚至带来责任追究的难题,潜在风险值得警惕。因此,法治化成为人工智能行政决策的必由之路。需对人工智能进行合理约束与调控,巧妙平衡智能决策与公民权益,激发公众参与热情,有效防范权利滥用。同时,强化决策者责任意识,完善责任追究机制。推动人工智能在行政决策中的良性应用,并妥善应对潜在风险,这不仅契合数字科技驱动的国家战略,更为数字法治政府建设增添了强劲动能,加快了政府治理与行政法治的现代化步伐。
Entering the new era of digitalization, artificial intelligence has brought technological innovation to the field of administrative decision-making, improved the efficiency of decision-making, and the science, democracy and legitimacy of decision-making, and also contributed to the prevention of abuse of power and the construction of digital government. However, AI administrative decisions are not perfect. Its characteristics of automation, complexity and ambiguity can sometimes lead to the conflict between intelligent decision-making and civil rights and interests, weaken the dominance of decision makers, and even bring the problem of accountability. The potential risks are worthy of vigilance. Therefore, the rule of law has become the only way for artificial intelligence administrative decision-making. It is necessary to reasonably restrain and regulate artificial intelligence, skillfully balance intelligent decision-making and civil rights and interests, stimulate public enthusiasm for participation, and effectively prevent the abuse of rights. At the same time, it strengthens the sense of responsibility of decision makers and improves the accountability mechanism. Promoting the benign application of artificial intelligence in administrative decision-making and properly dealing with potential risks are not only in line with the national strategy driven by digital technology, but also add strong momentum to the construction of a digital law-based government and accelerate the modernization of government governance and administrative rule of law.

References

[1]  苏丽, 张卓玉. 人工智能参与行政决策的法治风险探究[J]. 石家庄学院学报, 2023, 25(4): 155-160.
[2]  Suksi, M. (2020) Administrative Due Process When Using Automated Decision-Making in Public Administration: Some Notes from a Finnish Perspective. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 29, 87-110.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09269-x
[3]  李进华. 基于“大数据+区块链”技术应用的重大行政决策模式变革研究[J]. 大连干部学刊, 2021, 37(8): 53-59.
[4]  Roehl, U.B.U. (2023) Automated Decision-Making and Good Administration: Views from Inside the Government Machinery. Government Information Quarterly, 40, Article 101864.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101864
[5]  约翰·马尔科夫. 人工智能简史[M]. 郭雪, 译. 杭州: 浙江人民出版社, 2017: 114.
[6]  胡亚谦. 大数据预测能力对公共决策的影响[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 18(3): 281-287.
[7]  马桑, 张苑漫. 大数据视域下公共决策模式之转变: 经验、数据与统合[J]. 江汉学术, 2021, 40(2): 35-42.
[8]  夏金莱. 大数据行政决策法治化研究[J]. 比较法研究, 2023(3): 130-141.
[9]  陈景辉. 算法的法律性质: 言论、商业秘密还是正当程序? [J]. 比较法研究, 2020(2): 120-132.
[10]  马长山. 人工智能的社会风险及其法律规制[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2018, 36(6): 47-55.
[11]  马颜昕. 自动化行政方式下的行政处罚: 挑战与回应[J]. 政治与法律, 2020(4): 139-148.
[12]  约叔华·A.克鲁尔, 乔安娜·休伊, 索伦·巴洛卡斯, 等. 可问责的算法[J]. 地方立法研究, 2019, 4(4): 102-150.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133