|
一事不再罚原则在交通处罚中的适用问题研究
|
Abstract:
《行政处罚法》确立了一事不再罚的法律原则,但在实际操作中,特别是对于连续性交通违法行为如持续违法停车等,其具体应用存在一定的模糊性。交通执法不仅关系到公共秩序的维护,也与公民的合法权益紧密相连。面对连续多日的违法停车行为,仅进行一次处罚可能降低违法成本,不足以发挥行政处罚的教育和惩戒作用;而重复处罚则可能侵犯当事人的合法权益,影响处罚的合法性和公正性。因此,如何在确保公共秩序和保护当事人权益的同时,合理运用行政处罚,体现其教育与惩戒功能,成为亟待解决的问题。
“Administrative Penalty Law” establishes the legal principle of no longer punishment for a single incident, but in practical operation, especially for continuous traffic violations such as continuous illegal parking, there is a certain degree of ambiguity in its specific application. Traffic law enforcement is not only related to the maintenance of public order, but also closely linked to the legitimate rights and interests of citizens. Facing consecutive days of illegal parking behavior, only one punishment may reduce the cost of the violation and is not sufficient to play the educational and punitive role of administrative penalties. Repeated punishment may infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of the parties involved, affecting the legality and fairness of the punishment. Therefore, how to use administrative penalties reasonably while ensuring public order and protecting the rights and interests of the parties, and reflecting their educational and punitive functions, has become an urgent problem to be solved.
[1] | 田勇军. 交通行政处罚中“一事不再罚”之“一事”问题探析[J]. 交大法学, 2016(1): 67-86. |
[2] | 朱新力. 论一事不再罚原则[J]. 法学, 2001(11): 19-25. |
[3] | 江必新. 行政处罚法条文精释与实例精解[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2021: 165-166. |
[4] | 姜明安. 行政违法行为与行政处罚[J]. 中国法学, 1992(6): 42-46. |
[5] | 章剑生. 行政罚款适用规则的体系性解释——基于《行政处罚法》第29条展开的分析[J]. 政法论坛, 2022, 40(4): 18-28. |
[6] | 范怀磊, 马天. 持续性违法行为适用一事不再罚原则研究[J]. 文化学刊, 2023(8): 129-132. |
[7] | 陈无风. 穿行于一罚和多罚之间——论“一事不再罚”原则之内涵[J]. 行政法学研究. 2006(2): 58-64. |