全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

High-Voltage Low-Frequency Electric Field Exposure as an Antiviral Strategy: Effects on Viral Infectivity and Host Cell Viability

DOI: 10.4236/aid.2024.144052, PP. 702-711

Keywords: High-Voltage Therapy, Cell Viability, Viral Infectivity, Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 (HSV-1), Human Coronavirus OC43 (HCoV OC43), Influenza A Virus (A H1N1)

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This study explores the antiviral properties of high-voltage low-frequency electric field exposure on the replication of human viruses, including Herpes Simplex Virus type 1 (HSV-1), Human Coronavirus OC43 (HCoV OC43), and Influenza A virus (A H1N1). Using the HealectricsTM device (model S02), which operates by applying high-voltage direct current (30 - 50 kV) with a polarity change frequency of ~0.2 Hz, we investigated the impact on viral infectivity and host cell viability. Virus cultures were exposed to electric fields during different stages: virion adsorption (0 - 1 hour), intracellular replication (1 - 8 hours), and both stages. Viral infectivity was assessed through titration, and cytotoxic effects were evaluated using MTT assays. Electric field exposure significantly reduced viral infectivity, particularly during the combined sorption and replication stages, with up to a 90% decrease in viral activity. Among the viruses tested, HCoV OC43 showed the least sensitivity, with a reduction in viral activity by a factor of 5. Comparisons revealed statistically significant reductions for influenza and herpes viruses, and a trend towards significance for HCoV OC43. The electric field treatment did not significantly affect the viability of Vero and MDCK cells, indicating the method’s safety. Our findings suggest that high-voltage low-frequency electric fields can effectively reduce viral infectivity and may serve as a potential therapeutic and preventive measure against a wide range of membrane-bound viruses, including SARS-CoV-2.

References

[1]  Kaynan, N., Voloshin-Sela, T., Giladi, M. and Kirson, E.D. (2020) Inhibiting Viral Infection Using Alternating Electric Fields. U.S. Patent Application Number 16/506633. Preclinical Research Department, Novocure Ltd.
[2]  Kumagai, E., Tominaga, M. and Harada, S. (2011) Sensitivity to Electrical Stimulation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 and MAGIC-5 Cells. AMB Express, 1, Article No. 23.
https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-0855-1-23
[3]  Liang, Z. and Xiao, D.-M. (2008) Polarization and Absorption Principle of Coronavirus in the Electric Field. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (New Series), 15, 202-205.
[4]  Roohandeh, M. and Bamdad, T. (2011) Inactivation of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 & Adenovirus Type 5 by Direct Electric Current at a Biocompatible Level in Vitro. Clinical Laboratory, 57, 489-495.
[5]  Kriman, V. (2024) Study of the Effect of High-Voltage Low-Frequency Electrotherapy on Type 2 Diabetes in an in Vivo Model. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 12, 213-220.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2024.1211018
[6]  Reed, L.J. and Muench, H. (1938) A Simple Method of Estimating Fifty Percent Endpoints. American Journal of Epidemiology, 27, 493-497.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a118408
[7]  Mosmann, T. (1983) Rapid Colorimetric Assay for Cellular Growth and Survival: Application to Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assays. Journal of Immunological Methods, 65, 55-63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4
[8]  Arbeitman, C.R., Rojas, P., Ojeda-May, P. and Garcia, M.E. (2021) The SARS-Cov-2 Spike Protein Is Vulnerable to Moderate Electric Fields. Nature Communications, 12, Article No. 5407.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25478-7

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133