全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

踝Pilon骨折合并外踝骨折改良前外侧入路单侧切口1例
A Case of Ankle Pilon Fracture Combined with Lateral Malleolar Fracture via a Modified Anterolateral Approach with a Single Incision

DOI: 10.12677/acm.2024.14112964, PP. 921-928

Keywords: 踝皮隆骨折,改良前外侧入路,单侧切口,手术治疗,临床效果
Pilon Fracture of the Ankle
, Modified Anterolateral Approach, Single Incision, Surgical Treatment, Clinical Outcomes

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:探讨在治疗踝pilon骨折合并外踝骨折改良前外侧入路单侧切口的临床效果及其对术后恢复的影响。方法:报告一例53岁男性患者的双侧皮隆骨折病例。患者因从约2米的高度坠落而受伤。采用改良前外侧入路单侧切口进行手术,详细描述了该手术方法,并评估其优缺点以及如何最大限度地减少常规双侧入路带来的并发症。结果:手术成功完成,术中出血量少,手术时间相对较短。术后观察到软组织损伤较小,患者疼痛明显减轻,功能恢复良好。随访期间无明显并发症发生,骨折愈合情况良好,踝关节功能恢复满意。结论:改良前外侧入路治疗踝皮隆骨折是一种有效的方法,具有减少手术时间、降低软组织损伤、促进骨折愈合及减少并发症等优点,值得临床推广应用。
Objective: To investigate the clinical outcomes and postoperative recovery effects of a modified anterolateral approach using a single incision in the treatment of ankle pilon fractures combined with lateral malleolus fractures. Methods: This study reports a case of bilateral pilon fractures in a 53-year-old male patient. The patient sustained injuries from a fall of approximately 2 meters. A modified anterolateral approach with a single incision was used for the surgery. The surgical technique is described in detail, and the advantages and disadvantages of this method, as well as ways to minimize complications associated with the conventional bilateral approach, are evaluated. Results: The surgery was successfully completed with minimal intraoperative blood loss and relatively short operation time. Postoperative observations showed minimal soft tissue damage, significant pain relief, and good functional recovery. No significant complications were observed during follow-up, with satisfactory fracture healing and ankle joint function recovery. Conclusion: The modified anterolateral approach for treating ankle pilon fractures is an effective method, offering advantages such as reduced operation time, minimized soft tissue damage, promotion of fracture healing, and reduction of complications, making it worthy of clinical application and promotion.

References

[1]  Tosun, B. and Selek, O. (2019) Lateral Transfibular Approach to Tibial Pilon Fractures: A Case Report. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 109, 459-462.
https://doi.org/10.7547/17-212
[2]  唐青平. 闭合复位微创小切口内固定治疗Pilon骨折的临床疗效观察[J]. 微创医学, 2016, 11(5): 695-697.
[3]  Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, H., Liu, P., Zhang, W., et al. (2017) Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Limited Internal Fixation Combined with External Fixation for Pilon Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 20, 94-98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.06.012
[4]  薛文, 管晓鹂, 康忠仁, 等. 胫骨远端前外侧切口L-解剖锁定板治疗B3, C型Pilon骨折[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2016, 19(3): 352-354.
[5]  Sitnik, A., Beletsky, A. and Schelkun, S. (2017) Intra-articular Fractures of the Distal Tibia: Current Concepts of Management. EFORT Open Reviews, 2, 352-361.
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.2.150047
[6]  Blauth, M., Bastian, L., Krettek, C., Knop, C. and Evans, S. (2001) Surgical Options for the Treatment of Severe Tibial Pilon Fractures: A Study of Three Techniques. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 15, 153-160.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200103000-00002
[7]  王明鑫, 刘德昌, 王坤, 等. 改良双切口治疗合并腓骨骨折的Pilon骨折疗效观察[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2016, 30(12): 1483-1487.
[8]  黄晓楠, 郝磊, 沈明杰, 范猛. 后内侧入路切开复位内固定治疗后Pilon骨折的疗效分析[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2015, 17(2): 141-144.
[9]  王占长, 杜立, 苏志雄, 等. 切开复位内固定与MIPPO技术治疗Pilon骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2015, 30(10): 1072-1075.
[10]  俞光荣, 李春光. Pilon骨折的手术入路及解剖[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2016, 21(4): 377-381.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133