全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

平价汇率、名义汇率与中美贸易利益损溢
PPP, Nominal Exchange Rate and Sino-US Trade Interests Loss or Overflow

DOI: 10.12677/ass.2024.13111025, PP. 380-387

Keywords: 购买力平价,名义汇率,贸易利益,损溢
Purchasing Power Parity
, Nominal Exchange Rate, Trade Benefits, Loss and Overflow

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

基于价值公平交换的视角,通过对比平价汇率与名义汇率水平上中美双边贸易的进口成本与出口收益,粗略评估中美双方各自的贸易利益损溢,结果发现我国进出口(出口,进口)贸易利损占GDP比重近50年来年均达到?3.81% (?3.17%、?0.64%),入世以来年均达到?6.08% (?5.26%、?0.82%);美国进出口(进口,出口)贸易利溢占其GDP比重近50年来年均达到1.2% (0.87%、0.33%),我国入世以后年均达到2.41% (1.8%、0.61%)。因货币价格低估,我国隐性贸易利损极大,未来有必要巧妙引导人民币汇率向平价汇率收敛。
Based on the perspective of fair exchange of values, by comparing the import costs and export benefits of bilateral trade between China and the United States at the parity exchange rate and nominal exchange rate levels, a rough assessment of the trade interests of both sides was provided. The results show that the proportion of China’s import and export (export, import) trade losses to GDP has reached an average of ?3.81% (?3.17%, ?0.64%) annually in the past 50 years, and has reached an average of ?6.08% (?5.26%, ?0.82%) annually since China’s accession to the WTO; The import and export (import, export) trade profits of the United States have accounted for an average of 1.2% (0.87%, 0.33%) of its GDP in the past 50 years, after China’s accession to the WTO has reached 2.41% (1.8%, 0.61%). Due to the undervaluation of currency prices, China has suffered significant implicit trade losses. It is necessary to cleverly guide the RMB exchange rate to converge towards parity in the future.

References

[1]  King, A. (2020) The Triangular Purchasing Power Parity Hypothesis: A Comment. The World Economy, 44, 837-848.
https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13050
[2]  邱冬阳, 邓璇. 人民币购买力平价成立吗?——基于人民币兑欧元的多样本协整分析[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2020(4): 41-51.
[3]  Monadjemi, M.S. and Lodewijks, J. (2021) Inflation and Exchange Rates: An International Examination of Relative Purchasing Power Parity. Journal of Economics and Public Finance, 7, 1-10.
[4]  Nagayasu, J. (2021) Causal and Frequency Analyses of Purchasing Power Parity. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 71, Article ID: 101287.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101287
[5]  Vo, H.L. and Vo, D.H. (2022) The Purchasing Power Parity and Exchange‐Rate Economics Half a Century On. Journal of Economic Surveys, 37, 446-479.
https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12504
[6]  Olaniran, S.F. and Ismail, M.T. (2023) Testing Absolute Purchasing Power Parity in West Africa Using Fractional Cointegration Panel Approach. Scientific African, 20, e01615.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01615
[7]  戴艳娟, 泉宏志. 中日韩购买力平价的推算及中日韩比较[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2016(1): 85-108.
[8]  陈梦根, 胡雪梅. 一种改进的地区购买力平价指数[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019, 36(8): 147-164.
[9]  张伟. 地区购买力平价与2015-2019年省级地区居民消费价格水平——基于84个主要城市的研究[J]. 统计研究, 2022, 39(10): 119-132.
[10]  谢长. 一种新的购买力平价汇总方法[J]. 统计研究, 2017(12): 37-47.
[11]  胡雪梅. 地区购买力平价计算方法的比较与评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2017, 33(20): 34-38.
[12]  张迎春, 周子堰, 陈枫, 等. 国内购买力平价构建及物价水平研究[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2019, 34(3): 9-17.
[13]  王金萍. 国际比较项目计算购买力平价的方法[J]. 中国统计, 2022(7): 39-42.
[14]  陈梦根, 牛华. 购买力平价变动影响因素研究: 国际视角[J]. 金融研究, 2016(9): 82-98.
[15]  王岩, 刘韶敏. 国际比较项目购买力平价测算结果影响因素研究[J]. 统计研究, 2022, 39(12): 85-103.
[16]  戴金平, 杨珂, 刘东坡. 人民币汇率对购买力平价的偏离及原因分析[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2015(7): 35-41.
[17]  马晓君, 刘晓燕, 魏晓雪. 基于购买力平价法和汇率法比较的ICP实证研究——以中国为例[J]. 经济统计学(季刊), 2016(1): 61-73.
[18]  田园. 购买力平价与经济增长潜力研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 对外经济贸易大学, 2017.
[19]  Subrahmanyam, G. and Reddy, K.S. (2019) Gaps Galore in the Monetary Approach to the Purchasing Power Parity: A Theoretical Note. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, 12, 197-204.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17520843.2019.1620820
[20]  管涛, 付万丛. 购买力平价理论视角: 人民币中长期必然升值吗[J]. 国际金融, 2022(3): 3-7.
[21]  王国刚, 林楠. 中国外汇市场70年: 发展历程与主要经验[J]. 经济学动态, 2019(10): 3-10.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133