全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

林业碳汇惠益分配法律问题研究
Research on Legal Issues Concerning the Allocation of Carbon Sequestration Benefits in Forestry

DOI: 10.12677/ass.2024.13111021, PP. 349-356

Keywords: 林业碳汇,利益共享,主体界定,权利保障
Forestry Carbon Sequestration
, Benefit Sharing, Subject Definition, Rights Protection

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

设计有效、高效和公平的参与性林业碳汇惠益分配框架,需要与广泛的利益相关者进行协商和沟通,并保障其相关权利。现行法无法涵盖新兴环境事务中参与主体资质与权利的识别,应当借鉴REDD+经验厘清主体范畴,根据环境利益标准类型化参与主体,项目产出惠益共享的讨论侧重于分配减排货币化的收入,但不应成为唯一选择,利益相关人应当能够选择不同的惠益产出形式。应当认识到不同的利益相关者群体有差异化的需求与对项目认知的差异度,提升其参与惠益分配的意识,引入生态效益补偿的同时探索将问责制与非诉救济机制纳入林业碳汇惠益分配框架中,以更好实现参与各方共赢。
Designing an effective, efficient, and fair framework for participatory allocation of forestry carbon sink benefits requires consultation and communication with a wide range of stakeholders, while safeguarding their relevant rights. The current law cannot cover the identification of qualifications and rights of participating entities in emerging environmental affairs. It is necessary to draw on the experience of REDD+ to clarify the scope of entities, classify participating entities based on environmental interest standards, and discuss the sharing of project output benefits, which focuses on the distribution of monetized income from emission reduction, but should not be the only choice. Stakeholders should be able to choose different forms of benefit output. It should be recognized that different stakeholder groups have differentiated needs and perceptions of the project, and their awareness of participating in benefit distribution should be enhanced. While introducing ecological benefit compensation, it is also necessary to explore the inclusion of accountability and non litigation relief mechanisms in the forestry carbon sink benefit distribution framework, in order to better achieve a win-win situation for all parties involved.

References

[1]  饶艾, 张燕. 利益、法的价值、法律权利和义务关系论[J]. 中共四川省委省级机关党校学报, 2012(5): 73-77.
[2]  汪劲. 环境法学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2011.
[3]  李卫波, 侯可斌. 环境影响评价公众参与中“公众”界定研究[J]. 中国环境管理干部学院学报, 2018, 28(4): 5-7, 18.
[4]  于晶晶. 行政正当程序视角下环境公众参与制度的规范与完善[J]. 中国环境管理, 2021, 13(1): 149-155.
[5]  Ogonowski, M., Guimaraes, L., Ma, H., et al. (2024) Utilizing Payments for Environmental Services for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) in Developing Countries: Challenges and Policy Options. Social Science Electronic Publishing.
[6]  Armeni, C. (2016) Participation in Environmental Decision-Making: Reflecting on Planning and Community Benefits for Major Wind Farms. Journal of Environmental Law, 28, 415-441.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqw021
[7]  唐钊. 林业碳汇收益扶持机制研究[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2020, 31(23): 103-106.
[8]  朱梅钰, 龙飞, 祁慧博, 张哲. 基于行业减排的森林碳汇需求空间测度与分类[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(2): 377-386.
[9]  杨鑫, 尹少华, 邓晶, 张灵曼, 刘璨. 林业财政补贴政策对农户林业投资及其结构的影响分析——基于财政补贴的挤入与挤出效应视角[J]. 林业经济, 2021, 43(2): 5-20.
[10]  Luttrell, C., Loft, L., Fernanda Gebara, M., Kweka, D., Brockhaus, M., Angelsen, A., et al. (2013) Who Should Benefit from REDD+? Rationales and Realities. Ecology and Society, 18, Article 52.
https://doi.org/10.5751/es-05834-180452
[11]  Chapman, S., Wilder, M. and Millar, I. (2014) Defining the Legal Elements of Benefit Sharing in the Context of REDD+. Carbon & Climate Law Review, 8, 270-281.
[12]  Wong, G.Y., Luttrell, C., Loft, L., Yang, A., Pham, T.T., Naito, D., et al. (2019) Narratives in REDD+ Benefit Sharing: Examining Evidence within and Beyond the Forest Sector. Climate Policy, 19, 1038-1051.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1618786
[13]  Peskett, L., Huberman, D., Bowen-Jones, E., et al. (2008) Making REDD Work for the Poor: A Poverty Environment Partnership (PEP) Policy Brief.
[14]  刘清生. 论环境决策公众参与制度[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 43(1): 106-112.
[15]  章楚加. 重大环境行政决策中的公众参与权利实现路径——基于权能分析视角[J]. 理论月刊, 2021(5): 82-90.
[16]  车琛, 武曙红, 朱建华, 曾以禹. REDD+非碳效益类型识别及激励方式研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 14(3): 47-52.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133