全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

互联网平台经营者滥用市场支配地位的认定
Determination of Abuse of a Dominant Market Position by an Internet Platform Operator

DOI: 10.12677/ass.2024.13111011, PP. 262-267

Keywords: 互联网平台经营者,市场支配地位,排除、限制竞争
Internet Platform Operator
, Dominant Market Position, Exclusion and Restriction of Competition

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

在互联网平台经营者滥用市场支配地位的认定中,应遵循“相关市场–市场支配地位–滥用市场支配地位–排除、限制竞争”的认定思路。同时,基于互联网平台经济相比于传统经济模式具有双边性、“零价”等特征,互联网平台经营者相对于传统经营者具有较强的信息技术优势,数据和算法在市场竞争中占有重要地位。因此,在判断互联网平台经营者是否符合滥用市场支配地位构成要件时,应结合个案情况具体分析、综合评价。
In the determination of abuse of dominant market position by Internet platform operators, the idea of “relevant market-dominant market position-abuse of dominant market position-exclusion or restriction of competition” should be followed. At the same time, based on the bilateral and “zero price” characteristics of the Internet platform economy compared with the traditional economic model, Internet platform operators have stronger information technology advantages compared with traditional operators, and data and algorithms occupy an important position in market competition. Therefore, when judging whether the Internet platform operator meets the constitutive elements of abuse of dominant market position, it should be analysed in the context of individual cases and evaluated comprehensively.

References

[1]  杨明. 平台经济反垄断的二元分析框架[J]. 中外法学, 2022, 34(2): 366-384.
[2]  焦海涛. 滥用市场支配地位的性质定位与规范修正[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2022(1): 186-200.
[3]  刘贵祥. 滥用市场支配地位理论的司法考量[J]. 中国法学, 2016(5): 260-280.
[4]  殷继国. 大数据经营者滥用市场支配地位的法律规制[J]. 法商研究, 2020, 37(4): 73-87.
[5]  谭袁. 互联网平台滥用市场支配地位行为规制的困境与出路[J]. 法治研究, 2021(4): 110-123.
[6]  时建中. 共同市场支配地位制度拓展适用于算法默示共谋研究[J]. 中国法学, 2020(2): 89-107.
[7]  宋建宝. 数字平台市场领域禁止滥用市场支配地位制度适用问题研究[J]. 法律适用, 2024(6): 152-164.
[8]  袁嘉. 滥用数据优势行为的竞争法规制[J]. 政法论丛, 2024(2): 75-85.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133