全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Gravitomagnetism and Gravitational Lens

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1112628, PP. 1-11

Keywords: Gravitation, Dark Matter, Galaxies: Fundamental Parameters, Gravitational Lens

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

In ?[1], we presented a solution to explain dark matter (DM) in the framework of linearized general relativity (GRL) without exotic matter. GRL adds a second component to the Newtonian field, similar to the magnetic field in Electromagnetism (EM), hereinafter called “gravitic field”. GRL leads to the Einstein-Maxwell equations which hare equivalent to the Maxwell equations of EM. The aim of ?[1] was to obtain the expression of the rotation speeds of galaxies far from their center. We then applied this expression to recent observations of the rotation speeds of the Milky Way (MW). This allowed us to obtain a curve in very good agreement with observation and to define the expected value of two gravitic fields (also called gravitomagnetic), the own gravitic field of MW and a uniform external gravitic field embedding MW due to the neighboring clusters of galaxies. In the following article, we will deduce the expression of the Einstein radius of the Einstein rings obtained by gravitational lensing on light rays in this same GRL framework without exotic matter. We will then apply this expression to recent observations on the JWST-ER1 object ?[3] ?[4]. Once again, we will obtain results that are very good in agreement with observation since we will find the expected stellar mass within the Einstein ring without the need for any exotic matter. In addition, the gravitic field of JWST-ER1g (the lensing galaxy) will be in agreement with the value of the gravitic field obtained for MW in ?[1]. This result goes against the criticism that claims that GRL cannot explain the deviation of light and, in particular, the gravitational lensing effect ?[2], and furthermore, consolidates the solution of ?[1].

References

[1]  Le Corre, S. (2024) Milky Way Could Invalidate the Hypothesis of Exotic Matter and Favor a Gravitomagnetic Solution to Explain Dark Matter. Scientific Reports, 14, Article No. 27526. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79201-9
[2]  Costa, L.F.O. and Natário, J. (2024) Relativistic Effects Cannot Explain Galactic Dynamics. Physical Review D, 110, Article 064056. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.110.064056
[3]  van Dokkum, P., Brammer, G., Wang, B., Leja, J. and Conroy, C. (2023) A Massive Compact Quiescent Galaxy at Z=2 with a Complete Einstein Ring in JWST Imaging. Nature Astronomy, 8, 119-125. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02103-9
[4]  Mercier, W., Shuntov, M., Gavazzi, R., Nightingale, J.W., Arango, R., Ilbert, O., et al. (2024) The Cosmos-Web Ring: In-Depth Characterization of an Einstein Ring Lensing System at z~2. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 687, A61. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348095
[5]  Kong, D., Yang, D. and Yu, H. (2024) Cold Dark Matter and Self-Interacting Dark Matter Interpretations of the Strong Gravitational Lensing Object JWST-ER1. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 965, L19. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad394b
[6]  Le Corre, S. (2015) Dark Matter, a New Proof of the Predictive Power of General Relativity. arXiv: 1503.07440. https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07440
[7]  Wald, R.M. (1984) General Relativity. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001
[8]  Hobson, M.P., Efstathiou, G.P. and Lasenby, A.N. (2006) General Relativity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511790904
[9]  Will, C.M. (2014) The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment. Living Reviews in Relativity, 17, Article No. 4. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2014-4
[10]  Basdevant, J.L. (1986) Mécanique Quantique. Ecole Polytechnique, ELLIPSES Editor.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133