|
Modern Marketing 2024
触觉替代效应:网络营销中替代触觉对消费者产品评价的影响研究
|
Abstract:
在网络营销中,消费者无法真实触摸产品,这影响了其对产品的评价和购买决策。为解决这一问题,触觉补偿机制至关重要。本文从替代触觉出发,探究触觉替代效应的作用机制,即消费者在网络环境中观察手与产品的交互对产品评价的影响机制。研究发现,当消费者在网络环境中观察一只手与产品进行物理接触时,即触摸的虚拟性会使消费者产生触觉模拟,引起消费者触摸该产品的心理意象,进而增强消费者对该产品的感知所有权,这一影响机制促进了消费者有更好的产品评价;同时,消费者的触摸需求水平起到了调节作用,对于低NFT水平的消费者而言,替代触觉对产品评价的影响程度显著低于高NFT水平的消费者对于替代触觉对产品评价的影响程度。本研究不仅丰富了触觉营销的相关理论研究,同时也为电商平台如何更有效地动态展示在线产品提供了营销启示。
In network marketing, consumers can’t really touch the product, which affects their evaluation of the product and purchase decision. In order to solve this problem, the haptic compensation mechanism is very important. This paper explores the action mechanism of haptic substitution effect from the perspective of vicarious touch, that is, the influence mechanism of consumers observing the interaction between hands and products in the network environment on product evaluation. It is found that when consumers observe a hand in physical contact with a product in the network environment, that is, the virtuality of touch will make consumers produce tactile simulation, cause consumers to touch the mental image of the product, and then enhance consumers’ perceived ownership of the product, and this influence mechanism promotes consumers to have better product evaluation. At the same time, consumers’ touch demand level plays a regulating role. For consumers with low NFT level, the impact of alternative touch on product evaluation is significantly lower than that of consumers with high NFT level. This study has not only enriched the relevant theoretical research of haptic marketing, but also provided marketing enlightenment for e-commerce platforms on how to dynamically display online products more effectively.
[1] | Peck, J. and Shu, S.B. (2009) The Effect of Mere Touch on Perceived Ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 434-447. https://doi.org/10.1086/598614 |
[2] | Liu, W., Batra, R. and Wang, H. (2017) Product Touch and Consumers’ Online and Offline Buying: The Role of Mental Representation. Journal of Retailing, 93, 369-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2017.06.003 |
[3] | Peck, J. and Childers, T.L. (2003) To Have and to Hold: The Influence of Haptic Information on Product Judgments. Journal of Marketing, 67, 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.35.18612 |
[4] | 冷雄辉, 周小榆, 熊立. 触不可及还能感同身受吗?——在线产品隐喻文本描述的触觉补偿效应研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2022, 44(10): 87-103. |
[5] | 黄静, 郭昱琅, 王诚, 等. “你摸过, 我放心!”在线评论中触觉线索对消费者购买意愿的影响研究[J]. 营销科学学报, 2015, 11(1): 133-151. |
[6] | 宋晓晴, 赵杨, 孙习祥. 具身认知视角下的网络消费触觉弥补策略研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版), 2015, 37(4): 469-472. |
[7] | Liu, Y., Zang, X., Chen, L., Assumpção, L. and Li, H. (2017) Vicariously Touching Products through Observing Others’ Hand Actions Increases Purchasing Intention, and the Effect of Visual Perspective in This Process: An fMRI Study. Human Brain Mapping, 39, 332-343. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23845 |
[8] | Luangrath, A.W., Peck, J., Hedgcock, W. and Xu, Y. (2022) Observing Product Touch: The Vicarious Haptic Effect in Digital Marketing and Virtual Reality. Journal of Marketing Research, 59, 306-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437211059540 |
[9] | Klein, L.R. (2003) Creating Virtual Product Experiences: The Role of Telepresence. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17, 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10046 |
[10] | 王炳成, 李丰娟. 短视频生活场景还原与虚拟触觉契合程度对消费者购买意愿的影响——感知价值的中介作用[J]. 中国流通经济, 2022, 36(7): 38-48. |
[11] | 杨慧, 冷雄辉. 网上隐喻式产品图片展示触觉补偿效应的实证研究[J]. 当代财经, 2018(11): 78-87. |
[12] | Taylor, S.E. and Schneider, S.K. (1989) Coping and the Simulation of Events. Social Cognition, 7, 174-194. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1989.7.2.174 |
[13] | Shen, H., Zhang, M. and Krishna, A. (2016) Computer Interfaces and the “Direct-Touch” Effect: Can iPads Increase the Choice of Hedonic Food? Journal of Marketing Research, 53, 745-758. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0563 |
[14] | Liu, Y., Jiang, Z. and Chan, H.C. (2019) Touching Products Virtually: Facilitating Consumer Mental Imagery with Gesture Control and Visual Presentation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 823-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2019.1628901 |
[15] | Pierce, J.L., Kostova, T. and Dirks, K.T. (2001) Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 26, 298-310. https://doi.org/10.2307/259124 |
[16] | Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L. and Thaler, R.H. (1990) Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325-1348. https://doi.org/10.1086/261737 |
[17] | 武瑞娟, 胡艺潇, 李佩毓. 线上消费者评论中贴图对产品评价影响效应研究——基于对与吸引力相关产品正面评论的研究[J]. 营销科学学报, 2019, 15(3): 118-135. |
[18] | 聂春艳, 宋晓兵, 孟佳佳. 环境气味对消费者产品评价和购买意向的影响研究[J]. 管理科学, 2016, 29(5): 93-105. |
[19] | Jussila, I., Tarkiainen, A. and Sarstedt, M. (2015) Individual Psychological Ownership: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications for Research in Marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23, 121-139. |
[20] | Peck, J., Barger, V.A. and Webb, A. (2012) In Search of a Surrogate for Touch: The Effect of Haptic Imagery on Perceived Ownership. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.09.001 |
[21] | San-Martín, S., González-Benito, Ó. and Martos-Partal, M. (2017) To What Extent Does Need for Touch Affect Online Perceived Quality? International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 45, 950-968. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-04-2016-0054 |
[22] | Hermes, A., Sindermann, C., Montag, C. and Riedl, R. (2022) Exploring Online and In-Store Purchase Willingness: Associations with the Big Five Personality Traits, Trust, and Need for Touch. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 808500. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.808500 |
[23] | Hayes, A.F. (2013) An Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press. |
[24] | Argo, J.J., Dahl, D.W. and Morales, A.C. (2006) Consumer Contamination: How Consumers React to Products Touched by Others. Journal of Marketing, 70, 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.2.081 |