|
Modern Linguistics 2024
英汉元话语对比研究——以体育学博士论文摘要为例
|
Abstract:
随着学术研究的全球化,元话语在学术摘要中的使用越来越受到重视。本研究旨在探讨中美体育学博士论文摘要中元话语的使用情况,并分析其对学术写作的启示。研究采用定性与定量相结合的方法,选取中美体育学博士论文摘要作为研究对象。研究发现,中美体育学博士论文摘要中的元话语使用存在共性与差异,主要取决于语言特点、读者期待、体裁和写作传统等多种因素。研究结果对于学术写作教育和实践具有启示作用,特别是指导学生如何根据不同背景下有效地使用元话语以促进信息传递效率和提高学术交流。
With the globalization of academic research, more and more attention has been paid to the use of metadiscourse in academic abstracts. The purpose of this study is to explore the use of metadiscourse in Chinese and American physical education doctoral dissertation abstracts, and to analyze its implications for academic writing. The research adopts the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, and selects the Chinese and American physical education doctoral dissertation abstracts as the research object. It is found that there are similarities and differences in the use of metadiscourse in physical education doctoral dissertation abstracts between China and America, which are mainly determined by language characteristics, readers’ expectations, genres and writing traditions. The results of the study have implications for academic writing education and practice, especially in guiding students how to effectively use metadiscourse according to different contexts to promote the efficiency of information transmission and academic communication.
[1] | 郑新民, 景飞龙. 我国外语类学术期刊实证研究论文首尾呼应效果探析——体裁分析和元话语研究的视角[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2017(4): 42-51+147-148. |
[2] | Hyland, K. (2005) Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Continuum. |
[3] | 陈刚. “一带一路”战略实施中推进体育文化国际传播的研究[J]. 首都体育学院学报, 2017, 29(1): 4-7+25. |
[4] | 徐赳赳. 关于元话语的范围和分类[J]. 当代语言学, 2006(4): 345-353+380. |
[5] | 姜晖. 元语用视角下的功能性言语探究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2011(4): 15-19+60. |
[6] | 成晓光, 姜晖. 亚言语在大学英语写作中作用的研究[J]. 外语界, 2004(5): 68-73+79. |
[7] | 谢群. 商务谈判中的元话语研究——商务话语研究系列之一[J]. 外语研究, 2012(4): 19-23. |
[8] | 冉志晗. 基于元话语的总理政府工作报告人际互动模式研究[J]. 蚌埠学院学报, 2021, 10(1): 66-72. |
[9] | 孙明明, 佟敏强. 学术期刊英文摘要的元话语对比研究[J]. 学术交流, 2015(3): 214-218. |
[10] | Hyland, K. and Tse, P. (2004) Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25, 156-177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156 |
[11] | 王春艳. 免费绿色软件AntConc在外语教学和研究中的应用[J]. 外语电化教学, 2009(1): 45-48+78. |
[12] | Hyland, K. (1998) Persuasion and Context: The Pragmatics of Academic Metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00009-5 |
[13] | Hyland, K. and Jiang, F. (2018) “In This Paper We Suggest”: Changing Patterns of Disciplinary Metadiscourse. English for Specific Purposes, 51, 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001 |
[14] | 连淑能. 英汉对比研究[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2010. |
[15] | Qi, X. and Liu, L. (2007) Differences between Reader/Writer Responsible Languages Reflected in EFL Learners’ Writing. Inter-Cultural Communication Studies, 16, 148-159. |
[16] | Salager-Meyer, F. (1994) Hedges and Textual Communicative Function in Medical English Written Discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2 |