|
不同烹饪方式对三黄鸡鸡胸肉品质特性的影响
|
Abstract:
为探究煮制、蒸制、烤制以及微波不同烹饪加工方式对三黄鸡鸡胸肉品质特性的影响,本文以三黄鸡为研究对象,对不同烹饪方式鸡胸肉的食用品质(pH值、烹饪失水率、外形收缩率、持水力、质构特性、色差及感官评价)进行测定。结果表明,不同烹饪方式下鸡胸肉的品质特性具有显著差异(P < 0.05)。蒸制的鸡胸肉烹饪失水率和外形收缩率较低;烤制的鸡胸肉持水力最高,为81.67%;蒸制的鸡胸肉pH值和L*值最大;微波处理的鸡胸肉a*值最高,烤制的鸡胸肉b*值和ΔE*值最大;蒸制的鸡胸肉硬度、咀嚼性、内聚性较低,较易咀嚼;烤制和微波处理的鸡胸肉外观和风味较好,蒸制的鸡胸肉嫩度和多汁性较好,微波处理的鸡胸肉总体接受性最高,而煮制的鸡胸肉总体接受性最低。
In order to investigate the effects of boiling, steaming, roasting and microwaving on the quality characteristics of chicken breast meat of three-yellow chicken, this paper measured the edible quality (pH value, cooking loss, shape shrinkage, water holding capacity, textural characteristics, color and sensory evaluation) of chicken breast meat under different cooking methods using three-yellow chicken as the research object. The results showed that there were significant differences (P < 0.05) in the quality characteristics of chicken breast meat between cooking methods. Steamed chicken breast meat had a lower cooking loss and shape shrinkage; roasted chicken breast meat had the highest water holding capacity of 81.67%; steamed chicken breast meat had the highest pH and L* values; microwave-treated chicken breast meat had the highest a* values, and roasted chicken breast meat had the highest b* and ΔE* values; steamed chicken breast meat had lower hardness, chewiness, and cohesion, and was chewier; and roasted and microwave-treated chicken breast meat had a better appearance and flavor, the tenderness and juiciness were better in steamed chicken breast meat, overall acceptability was highest in microwave-treated chicken breast meat, and overall acceptability was lowest in boiled chicken breast meat.
[1] | 阿伊努热∙阿不都克力木. 乳酸菌固态制剂对三黄鸡生长性能及免疫性能影响的研究——以伊宁县小型肉鸡场为例[J]. 黑龙江粮食, 2024(3): 90-92. |
[2] | 陈炎坤, 黄华丽, 杨兴华, 等. 岑溪市特色农产品营销策略研究——以三黄鸡为例[J]. 商场现代化, 2024(4): 68-70. |
[3] | 陈宏锐, 罗妃娟. 地方优质品种“信都三黄鸡”的品质特点与养殖技术分析[J]. 新农民, 2024(17): 120-122. |
[4] | 王科瑜, 杨宏旭, 王超英, 等. 烘烤、蒸煮和微波加热技术在动物源性食品加工中的应用[J]. 食品工业科技, 2018, 39(13): 325-330. |
[5] | 庄惠. 论不同烹饪工艺对食品品质的影响[J]. 现代食品, 2021(14): 132-134. |
[6] | 李梦琪. 真空低温烹饪工艺对鸡腿肉品质及安全性的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 烟台: 烟台大学, 2019. |
[7] | 孙灵霞, 李苗云, 李闯, 等. 烹制工具及烹饪方法对鸡肉品质的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2020, 54(1): 150-154. |
[8] | 袁森, 庞林江, 路兴花, 等. 烹饪方式对鸡肉挥发性香气及质构特征的影响[J]. 食品与机械, 2015, 31(1): 33-36. |
[9] | 谢静, 薛盼盼, 章海风, 等. 传统与新式烹饪工艺对鸡肉品质的影响[J]. 中国调味品, 2020, 45(10): 68-71. |
[10] | 陈丽丽, 张树峰, 袁美兰, 等. 不同烹饪方式对脆肉鲩鱼肉营养品质的影响[J]. 中国调味品, 2019, 44(10): 40-45. |
[11] | 钱雨. 不同烹饪方法对猪肝品质的影响探究[J]. 中国食品工业, 2021(16): 126-128. |
[12] | 金锦华, 刘剑, 金丹莉, 等. 中餐烹制工艺对鸡胸肉理化品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2022, 43(16): 111-118. |
[13] | 刘芳圆, 周文达, 李晓. 不同烹饪方式的牛里脊质构品质比较[J]. 现代食品科技, 2021, 37(3): 220-226. |
[14] | 徐映雨, 赵溢智, 吴明洪, 等. 不同烹饪方式对水煮牛肉品质的影响[J]. 现代食品, 2023, 29(5): 72-76. |
[15] | 杨文昇. “阳光猪肉”品质及不同加工方式下物质变化规律研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 锦州: 渤海大学, 2020. |
[16] | Jeong, H.G., Jung, D.Y., Jo, K., Lee, S., Choi, Y., Yong, H.I., et al. (2021) Alternative of Phosphate by Freeze-or Oven-Dried Winter Mushroom Powder in Beef Patty. Food Science of Animal Resources, 41, 542-553. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2021.e18 |
[17] | 徐美珍, 张德权, 李少博, 等. 不同烹饪加工方式对羊肉品质和电子感官特性影响研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2024, 50(20): 161-170. |
[18] | Rao, J.W., Meng, F.B., Li, Y.C., et al. (2022) Effect of Cooking Methods on the Edible, Nutritive Qualities and Volatile Flavor Compounds of Rabbit Meat. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 102, 4218-4228. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11773 |
[19] | 袁静, 冯美琴, 孙健. 热加工方式对猪肉品质及氧化特性的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2023, 44(21): 114-120. |
[20] | 昝博文. 预制调理工艺对猪肉品质特性的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 成都大学, 2023. |
[21] | Ismail, I., Hwang, Y. and Joo, S. (2019) Effect of Different Temperature and Time Combinations on Quality Characteristics of Sous-Vide Cooked Goat Gluteus Medius and Biceps Femoris. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 12, 1000-1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-019-02272-4 |
[22] | 李甜甜, 谭青玲, 卢家维, 等. 真空低温烹饪温度对肌原纤维蛋白凝胶特性和结构的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2024, 50(18): 240-246. |
[23] | 王正雯, 田宏伟, 周富裕, 等. 加热温度对麻鸭肌原纤维蛋白结构与凝胶特性的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(13): 61-68. |
[24] | 古明辉, 刘永峰, 甘斐, 等. 铝箔法烤制对牛肉食用和营养品质的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(7): 136-141. |
[25] | 林丹, 吴宝珠, 冷朝杰, 等. 宫保鸡丁微波烹饪工艺优化及其挥发性风味物质分析[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2022, 13(19): 6171-6180. |