|
Modern Linguistics 2024
CNN和《中国日报》新能源新闻报道中介入系统的生态话语分析
|
Abstract:
党的十八大以来,“绿水青山就是金山银山”的理念深入人心,“共抓大保护、不搞大开发”成为了共识。新闻语篇作为大众传播的重要载体,能够传递某种态度、意向和情感,进而影响其认知和行为。本研究从生态话语分析范式切入,对中美新能源新闻语篇中的介入资源展开了深入剖析,尝试挖掘并阐发了介入资源的分布情况与折射的生态理念。研究发现:中美都更多地使用了“扩展”资源。并且,中国新能源语篇报道中有益性介入居多,美国新能源新闻语篇中多为破坏性介入。
Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the concept of “clear waters and green mountains are as good as mountains of gold and silver” has been deeply popular, and “well-coordinated environmental conservation and avoiding excessive development” has become a consensus. News discourse, as an important carrier of mass communication, can transmit certain attitudes, intentions and emotions, and then affect their cognition and behavior. Starting from the ecological discourse analysis paradigm, this study conducted an in-depth analysis of the engagement system in Chinese and American new energy news discourses, and tried to dig out and explain the distribution of engagement resources and reflected ecological properties. It is found that both China and America use more expansion resources. In addition, most of the Chinese new energy news reports are eco-beneficial engagement, while most of the American new energy news reports are eco-destructive engagement.
[1] | 张慧, 杨连瑞. 中美气候变化新闻语篇中态度资源的生态话语分析[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(5): 43-52. |
[2] | 江骐. 及物性系统视角下新能源汽车企业总裁致辞语的生态话语分析[J]. 现代英语, 2023(18): 72-75. |
[3] | 黄国文, 陈旸. 生态哲学与话语的生态分析[J]. 外国语文, 2012, 32(6): 55-61. |
[4] | Haugen, E. (1972) The Ecology of Language. Stanford University Press. |
[5] | Halliday. M.A.K. (1990) New Ways of Meaning: The Challenge to Applied Linguistics. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6, 7-16. |
[6] | Alexander, R. and Stibbe, A. (2014) From the Analysis of Ecological Discourse to the Ecological Analysis of Discourse. Language Sciences, 41, 104-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.011 |
[7] | Stibbe, A. (2015) Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live by. Routledge. |
[8] | 黄国文, 赵蕊华. 生态话语分析的缘起、目标、原则与方法[J]. 现代外语, 2017, 40(5): 585-596+729. |
[9] | 何伟, 张瑞杰. 生态话语分析模式构建[J]. 中国外语, 2017, 14(5): 56-64. |
[10] | 雷蕾, 苗兴伟. 生态话语分析中的生态哲学观研究[J]. 外语学刊, 2020(3): 120-123. |
[11] | 李淑晶. 生态语言哲学观研究述评[J]. 外国语文, 2021, 37(1): 86-94. |
[12] | 黄国文. 论生态话语和行为分析的假定和原则[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2017, 49(6): 880-889+960. |
[13] | 何伟, 魏榕. 多元和谐, 交互共生——国际生态话语分析之生态哲学观建构[J]. 外语学刊, 2018(6): 28-35. |
[14] | 王雅珍, 佟玉平. 基于语料库在态度系统视角下的生态话语分析[J]. 黑龙江教师发展学院学报, 2022, 41(8): 115-118. |