全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

A Comparative Study of Optimization Techniques on the Rosenbrock Function

DOI: 10.4236/ojop.2024.133004, PP. 51-63

Keywords: Machine Learning, Optimization Algorithm, Rosenbrock Function, Gradient Descent

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

In the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence and machine learning, the choice of optimization algorithm can significantly impact the success of model training and the accuracy of predictions. This paper embarks on a rigorous and comprehensive exploration of widely adopted optimization techniques, specifically focusing on their performance when applied to the notoriously challenging Rosenbrock function. As a benchmark problem known for its deceptive curvature and narrow valleys, the Rosenbrock function provides a fertile ground for examining the nuances and intricacies of algorithmic behavior. The study delves into a diverse array of optimization methods, including traditional Gradient Descent, its stochastic variant (SGD), and the more sophisticated Gradient Descent with Momentum. The investigation further extends to adaptive methods like RMSprop, AdaGrad, and the highly regarded Adam optimizer. By meticulously analyzing and visualizing the optimization paths, convergence rates, and gradient norms, this paper uncovers critical insights into the strengths and limitations of each technique. Our findings not only illuminate the intricate dynamics of these algorithms but also offer actionable guidance for their deployment in complex, real-world optimization problems. This comparative analysis promises to intrigue and inspire researchers and practitioners alike, as it reveals the subtle yet profound impacts of algorithmic choices in the quest for optimization excellence.

References

[1]  Smith, L. and Topin, N. (2024) Beyond SGD: An Empirical Study of Modern Optimization Techniques in Deep Learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25, 1-20.
[2]  Kim, S. and Park, J. (2024) A Comprehensive Review of Adaptive Optimization Methods for Machine Learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57, 1-35.
[3]  Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. and Courville, A. (2016) Deep Learning. MIT Press.
[4]  Bottou, L., Curtis, F. and Nocedal, J. (2018) Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning. SIAM Review, 60, 223-311.
https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1080173
[5]  Sutskever, I., Martens, J., Dahl, G. and Hinton, G. (2013) On the Importance of Initialization and Momentum in Deep Learning. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Atlanta, 16-21 June 2013, 1139-1147.
[6]  Tieleman, T. and Hinton, G. (2012) Lecture 6.5-rmsprop: Divide the Gradient by a Running Average of Its Recent Magnitude. Coursera: Neural Networks for Machine Learning, 4, 26-31.
[7]  Duchi, J., Hazan, E. and Singer, Y. (2011) Adaptive Subgradient Methods for Online Learning and Stochastic Optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2121-2159.
[8]  Kingma, D.P. and Ba, J. (2014) Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Banff, 14-16 April 2014.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133