Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of two surgical methods for lumbar degenerative diseases; the combination of the concept of accelerated rehabilitation with the assistance of Tianji Robotics and the concept of accelerated rehabilitation combined with manual pedicle screw placement assisted by conventional C-arm fluoroscopy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 70 patients who received the concept of accelerated rehabilitation combined with spinal surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases in Baise People’s Hospital from January 2022 to January 2024. Among them, 35 patients in the robot group received accelerated rehabilitation concept combined with robot-assisted surgery; In the conventional C-arm group, 35 patients received the accelerated rehabilitation concept combined with manual pedicle screw placement assisted by conventional C-arm fluoroscopy. VAS score (preoperative/postoperative), ODI score (preoperative/postoperative), intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications and the accuracy rate of screw placement were compared between the two groups. Result: There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative VAS scores between the robot group and the conventional C-arm group (6.45 ± 0.82 VS 6.63 ± 0.81, P = 0.6600). The postoperative VAS score of the robot group was better than that of the conventional C-arm group (1.69 ± 0.80 VS 2.45 ± 0.85, P = 0.0000*). There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative ODI scores between the robot group and the conventional C-arm group (32.11 ± 3.18 VS 31.66 ± 2.25, P = 0.4900). The postoperative ODI score of the robot group was better than that of the conventional C-arm group (22.68 ± 1.94 VS 24.57 ± 2.25, P = 0.0000*). The postoperative complications in the robot group were less than those in the conventional C-arm group (2.7778% VS 28.5724%, P = 0.0030*). The intraoperative bleeding in the robot group was lower than that in the conventional C-arm group (320.85 ± 276.28 VS 490.00 ± 395.34, P = 0.0420*). The postoperative hospital stay of the robot group was shorter than that of the conventional C-arm group (10.00 ± 9.32 VS 14.49 ± 7.55, P = 0.0300*). The screw placement inaccuracy score of the robot group was lower than that of the conventional C-arm group (0.17 ± 0.51 VS 1.45 ± 1.46, P = 0.0000*). Conclusion: The combination of the concept of accelerated rehabilitation and Tianji Orthopedic robot-assisted surgery is more effective and
References
[1]
Huang, H.P., Mo, L.J., Li, T.Y., et al. (2020) The Application Effect of the Concept of Accelerated Rehabilitation Surgery in the Daytime Surgery Mode of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy under Ureteroscopy. Guangxi Medicine, 42, 964-967.
[2]
Mundhra, R., Gupta, D.K., Bahadur, A., Kumar, A. and Kumar, R. (2024) Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocol on Maternal Outcomes Following Emergency Caesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. EuropeanJournalofObstetrics&GynecologyandReproductiveBiology: X, 22, Article ID: 100295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100295
[3]
Qi, J.X. (2023) Clinical Research on the Application of Accelerated Rehabilitation Surgery Concept in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery. Youjiang Ethnic Medical College.
[4]
Singh, S.M., Liverpool, A., Romeiser, J.L., Thacker, J., Gan, T.J. and Bennett-Guerrero, E. (2021) Types of Surgical Patients Enrolled in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Programs in the USA. PerioperativeMedicine, 10, Article No. 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-021-00185-5
[5]
Salamanna, F., Contartese, D., Brogini, S., Visani, A., Martikos, K., Griffoni, C., et al. (2022) Key Components, Current Practice and Clinical Outcomes of ERAS Programs in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review. JournalofClinicalMedicine, 11, Article 4222. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144222
[6]
Bogani, G., Sarpietro, G., Ferrandina, G., Gallotta, V., DI Donato, V., Ditto, A., et al. (2021) Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) in Gynecology Oncology. EuropeanJournalofSurgicalOncology, 47, 952-959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.10.030
[7]
Lampilas, A., Bouyer, B., Ferrero, E., Khalifé, M., Bergeot, A., Guigui, P., et al. (2021) Evaluation of Enhanced Recovery after Spine Surgery: Specificities in an Academic Public Hospital. Orthopaedics&Traumatology: Surgery&Research, 107, Article ID: 103027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103027
[8]
Tian, W., Liu, Y., Liu, B., He, D., Wu, J., Han, X., et al. (2019) Guideline for Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Assisted by Orthopaedic Surgical Robot. OrthopaedicSurgery, 11, 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12453
[9]
Zhang, X.N., Liu, Y.Z., Li, Y., et al. (2023) A Clinical Comparative Study of Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery and X-Ray Fluoroscopy Assisted Manual Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Placement for the Treatment of Single Segment Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases. Journal of Capital Medical University, 44, 836-844.
[10]
Zhao, T., Huang, C.K. and Su, G.S. (2024) The Application Effect of Robot Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement and Conventional Open Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Spine Fractures. Minimally Invasive Medicine, 19, 19-26.
[11]
Wang, S., Wang, P., Li, X., Sun, W., Kong, C. and Lu, S. (2022) Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway: Association with Lower Incidence of Wound Complications and Severe Hypoalbuminemia in Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Fusion Surgery. JournalofOrthopaedicSurgeryandResearch, 17, Article No. 178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03070-z
[12]
Wang, R.S., Huang, C.J., Su, X.J., et al. (2019) Research on the Application of Accelerated Rehabilitation Surgery Concept in Elderly Single Segment Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases. Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine, 8, 454-458.
[13]
Tarıkçı Kılıç, E., Demirbilek, T. and Naderi, S. (2019) Does an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol Change Costs and Outcomes of Single-Level Lumbar Microdiscectomy? NeurosurgicalFocus, 46, E10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.1.focus18665
[14]
Bansal, T., Sharan, A.D. and Garg, B. (2022) Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocol in Spine Surgery. JournalofClinicalOrthopaedicsandTrauma, 31, Article ID: 101944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101944
[15]
Chakravarthy, V.B., Yokoi, H., Coughlin, D.J., Manlapaz, M.R. and Krishnaney, A.A. (2019) Development and Implementation of a Comprehensive Spine Surgery Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol: The Cleveland Clinic Experience. NeurosurgicalFocus, 46, E11. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.1.focus18696
[16]
Feng, C., Zhang, Y., Chong, F., Yang, M., Liu, C., Liu, L., et al. (2019) Establishment and Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Pathway Tailored for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery. WorldNeurosurgery, 129, e317-e323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.139
[17]
Wu, C.L., Wang, X., Li, Z.Z., et al. (2024) Clinical Efficacy Study of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Assisted by Surgical Robots for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures in the Upper and Middle Thoracic Vertebrae. Zhejiang Trauma Surgery, 29, 235-238.
[18]
Tan, H.S., Lai, J.Y., Feng, H.L., et al. (2024) Application of Percutaneous Nail Placement Assisted by the Third Generation Tianji Orthopedic Robot in Lumbar Fusion Internal Fixation through Intermuscular Approach. Chinese Journal of Orthopedics and Traumatology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 32, 20-24.
