Research using open-circuit respiration chambers has established that Asparagopsis bioactive compounds stabilized in canola oil (Asp-Oil), delivering a range of inclusion between 34 - 51 mg bromoform (CHBr3)/kg dry matter intake (DMI), inhibits methane (CH4) emissions > 98% in feedlot cattle. In this study, Asp-Oil was fed at 35 mg CHBr3/kg DMI in the feedlot finisher diet under highly replicated and commercially relevant conditions, and adequately powered to confirm differences as low as 3.3% in feed conversion efficiency (FCE). The study also evaluated the effect of Asp-Oil on CH4 production (g/day), carcass and meat-eating qualities, animal health, and food safety. The experiment consisted of 300 Angus-Shorthorn (Bos taurus) steers in 30 pens of 10 and fed a barley-based ration supplemented with canola oil (Control, n = 15), or Asp-Oil (n = 15) for total 81-d, inclusive of 21-d transition to full Asp-Oil and grain inclusion in the finisher ration. Reduction of CH4 was measured using GreenFeed Emissions Monitors (GEM) in a subset of 2 pens in both Control and Asp-Oil. However, 67% of CH4 measurements were recorded below the GEM’s limit of detection. An inhibition range of 58% - 98% was demonstrated by collectively using GEM and preliminary respiration chamber measurements. Asp-Oil improved FCE 7.4% in the finisher diet, and 5.6% across transition and finisher periods. During the transition steps the steers had not yet received their full allocations of grain and Asp-Oil which is responsible for the lower FCE benefits. A 4.1% lower DMI in the finisher period contributed to benefits in FCE with no effect on daily weight gains. Cost of feed and weight gain were reduced $0.35/head/day and $0.23/kg, respectively, in steers receiving Asp-Oil. Residues of Asparagopsis CHBr3 were not detected in any sample and only trace iodide and bromide were detected in livers and kidneys of both Control and Asp-Oil steers at levels safe for human consumption. Steers demonstrated normal rumen development typical of feedlot diets. This study confirms that Asp-Oil safely induces significant productivity benefits and CH4 reductions in feedlot beef production. Commercial adoption of Asparagopsis can benefit feedlot beef production and reduces the climate change contribution of livestock production.
References
[1]
Kinley, R.D., Martinez-Fernandez, G., Matthews, M.K., de Nys, R., Magnusson, M. and Tomkins, N.W. (2020) Mitigating the Carbon Footprint and Improving Productivity of Ruminant Livestock Agriculture Using a Red Seaweed. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, Article ID: 120836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120836
[2]
Roque, B.M., Venegas, M., Kinley, R.D., de Nys, R., Duarte, T.L., Yang, X., et al. (2021) Red Seaweed (Asparagopsis taxiformis) Supplementation Reduces Enteric Methane by over 80 Percent in Beef Steers. PLOS ONE, 16, e0247820. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247820
[3]
Cowley, F.C., Kinley, R.D., Mackenzie, S.L., Fortes, M.R.S., Palmieri, C., Simanungkalit, G., et al. (2024) Bioactive Metabolites of Asparagopsis Stabilized in Canola Oil Completely Suppress Methane Emissions in Beef Cattle Fed a Feedlot Diet. Journal of Animal Science, 102, skae109. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae109
[4]
Roque, B.M., Salwen, J.K., Kinley, R. and Kebreab, E. (2019) Inclusion of Asparagopsis armata in Lactating Dairy Cows’ Diet Reduces Enteric Methane Emission by over 50 Percent. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 132-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.193
[5]
Alvarez-Hess, P.S., Jacobs, J.L., Kinley, R.D., Roque, B.M., Neachtain, A.S.O., Chandra, S., et al. (2023) Twice Daily Feeding of Canola Oil Steeped with Asparagopsis armata Reduced Methane Emissions of Lactating Dairy Cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 297, Article ID: 115579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2023.115579
[6]
Krizsan, S.J., Ramin, M., Chagas, J.C.C., Halmemies-Beauchet-Filleau, A., Singh, A., Schnürer, A., et al. (2023) Effects on Rumen Microbiome and Milk Quality of Dairy Cows Fed a Grass Silage-Based Diet Supplemented with the Macroalga Asparagopsis taxiformis. Frontiers in Animal Science, 4, Article 1112969. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2023.1112969
[7]
Kinley, R.D., Tan, S., Turnbull, J., Askew, S., Harris, J. and Roque, B.M. (2022) Exploration of Methane Mitigation Efficacy Using Asparagopsis-Derived Bioactives Stabilized in Edible Oil Compared to Freeze-Dried Asparagopsis in Vitro. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 13, 1023-1041. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2022.137068
[8]
Paul, N., de Nys, R. and Steinberg, P. (2006) Chemical Defence against Bacteria in the Red Alga Asparagopsis armata: Linking Structure with Function. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 306, 87-101. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps306087
[9]
Magnusson, M., Vucko, M.J., Neoh, T.L. and de Nys, R. (2020) Using Oil Immersion to Deliver a Naturally-Derived, Stable Bromoform Product from the Red Seaweed Asparagopsis taxiformis. Algal Research, 51, Article ID: 102065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2020.102065
[10]
Tan, S., Harris, J., Roque, B.M., Askew, S. and Kinley, R.D. (2022) Shelf-Life Stability of Asparagopsis Bromoform in Oil and Freeze-Dried Powder. Journal of Applied Phycology, 35, 291-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-022-02876-y
[11]
Zinn, R.A. and Jorquera, A.P. (2007) Feed Value of Supplemental Fats Used in Feedlot Cattle Diets. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 23, 247-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2007.03.003
[12]
Stefenoni, H.A., Räisänen, S.E., Cueva, S.F., Wasson, D.E., Lage, C.F.A., Melgar, A., et al. (2021) Effects of the Macroalga Asparagopsis taxiformis and Oregano Leaves on Methane Emission, Rumen Fermentation, and Lactational Performance of Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 104, 4157-4173. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19686
[13]
Morgavi, D.P., Cantalapiedra-Hijar, G., Eugène, M., Martin, C., Noziere, P., Popova, M., et al. (2023) Review: Reducing Enteric Methane Emissions Improves Energy Metabolism in Livestock: Is the Tenet Right? Animal, 17, Article ID: 100830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100830
[14]
Martin, S.W., Meek, A.H. and Willeberg, P. (1987) Veterinary Epidemiology: Principles and Methods. Iowa State University Press.
[15]
Galyean, M.L., Cole, N.A., Tedeschi, L.O. and Branine, M.E. (2016) BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Efficiency of Converting Digestible Energy to Metabolizable Energy and Reevaluation of the California Net Energy System Maintenance Requirements and Equations for Predicting Dietary Net Energy Values for Beef Cattle1. Journal of Animal Science, 94, 1329-1341. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-0223
[16]
Heim, R.A.L. and Krebs, G.L. (2019) Ruminal Protein Digestibility of Australian Produced Oilseed Meals. Animal Production Science, 59, 1281-1287. https://doi.org/10.1071/an18054
[17]
Lawrence, R.J. (1998) A Comparison of Feedlot Bunk Management Strategies and Their Influence on Cattle Performance and Health. Animal Production in Australia, 22, 177-180.
[18]
AUS-MEAT Limited (2005) Handbook of Australian Meat. 7th Edition. AUS-MEAT Limited. https://www.aussiebeefandlamb.me/downloads/Handbook_of_Australian_Meat_7th_Edition-English.pdf
[19]
Meat Standards Australia (2007) MSA Standards Manual for Beef Grading. Meat & Livestock Australia North Sydney, Australia. https://www.mla.com.au/globalassets/mla-corporate/marketing-beef-and-lamb/documents/meat-standards-australia/msa-standards-manual-beef-grading-august-2007.pdf
[20]
Romans, J.R., Costello, W.J., Carlson, C.W., Greaser, M.L. and Jones, K.W. (1994) The Meat We Eat. Interstate Publishers Inc.
[21]
Watson, R., Gee, A., Polkinghorne, R. and Porter, M. (2008) Consumer Assessment of Eating Quality—Development of Protocols for Meat Standards Australia (MSA) Testing. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 48, 1360-1367. https://doi.org/10.1071/ea07176
[22]
Jonsson, N.N., Ferguson, H.J., Koh-Tan, H.H.C., McCartney, C.A., Cernat, R.C., Strachan, E.M., et al. (2020) Postmortem Observations on Rumen Wall Histology and Gene Expression and Ruminal and Caecal Content of Beef Cattle Fattened on Barley-Based Rations. Animal, 14, 1447-1460. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731119002878
[23]
Manafiazar, G., Zimmerman, S. and Basarab, J. (2016) Repeatability and Variability of Short-Term Spot Measurement of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Beef Cattle Using Greenfeed Emissions Monitoring System. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 97, 118-126. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2015-0190
[24]
Hristov, A.N., Oh, J., Giallongo, F., Frederick, T., Weeks, H., Zimmerman, P.R., et al. (2015) The Use of an Automated System (Greenfeed) to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 103, e52904. https://doi.org/10.3791/52904
[25]
R Core Team (2023) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
[26]
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L., François, R., et al. (2019) Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4, Article 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
[27]
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. and Walker, S. (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
[28]
Lenth, R.V. (2020) Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means. Aka Least-Squares Means R Package Version 1.5.3.
[29]
Kinsman, R., Sauer, F.D., Jackson, H.A. and Wolynetz, M.S. (1995) Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Dairy Cows in Full Lactation Monitored over a Six-Month Period. Journal of Dairy Science, 78, 2760-2766. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(95)76907-7
[30]
United Nations (2024) Greenwashing—The Deceptive Tactics behind Environmental Claims. https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/climate-issues/greenwashing
[31]
Nyløy, E., Prestløkken, E., Eknæs, M., Eikanger, K.S., Heldal Hagen, L. and Kidane, A. (2023) Inclusion of Red Macroalgae (Asparagopsis taxiformis) in Dairy Cow Diets Modulates Feed Intake, Chewing Activity and Estimated Saliva Secretion. Animals, 13, Article 489. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13030489
[32]
Alvarez-Hess, P.S., Jacobs, J.L., Kinley, R.D., Roque, B.M., Neachtain, A.S.O., Chandra, S., et al. (2024) Effects of a Range of Effective Inclusion Levels of Asparagopsis armata Steeped in Oil on Enteric Methane Emissions of Dairy Cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 310, Article ID: 115932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.115932
[33]
Wolin, M.J., Miller, T.L. and Stewart, C.S. (1997) Microbe-Microbe Interactions. In: Hobson, P.N. and Stewart, C.S., Eds., The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem, Springer, 467-491. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_11
[34]
Janssen, P.H. (2010) Influence of Hydrogen on Rumen Methane Formation and Fermentation Balances through Microbial Growth Kinetics and Fermentation Thermodynamics. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 160, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.07.002
[35]
Mitsumori, M., Shinkai, T., Takenaka, A., Enishi, O., Higuchi, K., Kobayashi, Y., et al. (2011) Responses in Digestion, Rumen Fermentation and Microbial Populations to Inhibition of Methane Formation by a Halogenated Methane Analogue. British Journal of Nutrition, 108, 482-491. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114511005794
[36]
Martinez-Fernandez, G., Denman, S.E., Yang, C., Cheung, J., Mitsumori, M. and McSweeney, C.S. (2016) Methane Inhibition Alters the Microbial Community, Hydrogen Flow, and Fermentation Response in the Rumen of Cattle. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, Article 1122. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01122
[37]
Ungerfeld, E.M. (2015) Shifts in Metabolic Hydrogen Sinks in the Methanogenesis-Inhibited Ruminal Fermentation: A Meta-analysis. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, Article 37. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00037
[38]
Martinez-Fernandez, G., Denman, S.E., Cheung, J. and McSweeney, C.S. (2017) Phloroglucinol Degradation in the Rumen Promotes the Capture of Excess Hydrogen Generated from Methanogenesis Inhibition. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, Article 1871. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01871
[39]
Romero, P., Belanche, A., Jiménez, E., Hueso, R., Ramos-Morales, E., Salwen, J.K., et al. (2023) Rumen Microbial Degradation of Bromoform from Red Seaweed (Asparagopsis taxiformis) and the Impact on Rumen Fermentation and Methanogenic Archaea. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 14, Article No. 133. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00935-z
[40]
Karthik, R., Manigandan, V., Sheeba, R., Saravanan, R. and Rajesh, P.R. (2016) Structural Characterization and Comparative Biomedical Properties of Phloroglucinol from Indian Brown Seaweeds. Journal of Applied Phycology, 28, 3561-3573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-016-0851-2
[41]
Maghraby, Y.R., Farag, M.A., G Kontominas, M., Shakour, Z.T. and Ramadan, A.R. (2022) Nanoencapsulated Extract of a Red Seaweed (Rhodophyta) Species as a Promising Source of Natural Antioxidants. ACS Omega, 7, 6539-6548. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c05517
[42]
Li, X., Norman, H.C., Kinley, R.D., Laurence, M., Wilmot, M., Bender, H., et al. (2018) Asparagopsis taxiformis Decreases Enteric Methane Production from Sheep. Animal Production Science, 58, 681-688. https://doi.org/10.1071/an15883
[43]
Trumbo, P., Yates, A.A., Schlicker, S. and Poos, M. (2001) Dietary Reference Intakes. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 101, 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-8223(01)00078-5
[44]
JMPR (1989) 611 Bromide Ion. Pesticide Residues in Food-1988 Evaluations. Part II-Toxicology. Plant Production and Protection Paper 93/2. Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues, Rome, Italy. World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.inchem.org/documents/jmpr/jmpmono/v88pr03.htm
[45]
WHO (2009) Bromide in Drinking-Water: Background Document for Development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality (No. WHO/HSE/WSH/09.01/6). World Health Organization. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/wash-documents/wash-chemicals/bromide-background.pdf?sfvrsn=b6bc4478_4
[46]
Lorenz, I. (2022) Diseases of the Ruminant Forestomach: Ruminal Parakeratosis in Cattle and Sheep. MSD Veterinary Manual.
[47]
Magrin, L., Brscic, M., Lora, I., Prevedello, P., Contiero, B., Cozzi, G., et al. (2021) Assessment of Rumen Mucosa, Lung, and Liver Lesions at Slaughter as Benchmarking Tool for the Improvement of Finishing Beef Cattle Health and Welfare. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, Article 622837 https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.622837
[48]
Bell, M.J., Craigon, J., Saunders, N., Goodman, J.R. and Garnsworthy, P.C. (2018) Does the Diurnal Pattern of Enteric Methane Emissions from Dairy Cows Change over Time? Animal, 12, 2065-2070. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731118000228
