|
论现有叙事理论体系的局限及其增补:评理查森的《非自然叙事》
|
Abstract:
文章旨在探讨现有叙事理论的局限,并论证为其引入非自然叙事理论的必要性。传统的叙事理论往往局限于模仿性和线性叙事结构,这不足以解释后现代和实验性文本中的独特叙事现象。理查森的《非自然叙事》通过引入反模仿和非线性叙事等概念,扩展了叙事学的边界,促进了对多样化叙事形式的理解,为叙事研究提供了新的视角和工具,揭示了非自然叙事对扩展现有叙事理论的独特贡献。
This paper aims to explore the limitations of existing narrative theories and argue for the need to supplement them with the theory of unnatural narrative. Traditional narrative theory tends to focus on mimetic and linear narrative structures, which are insufficient for explaining the unique narrative phenomena present in postmodern and experimental texts. Richardson’s Unnatural Narrative expands the boundaries of narratology by introducing concepts such as antimimetic and nonlinear narratives. This work enhances the understanding of diverse narrative forms and provides new perspectives and tools for narrative studies, highlighting the unique contributions that unnatural narrative makes in extending existing narrative theory.
[1] | 理查森. 非自然叙事: 理论、历史与实践[M]. 舒凌鸿, 译. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2021 |
[2] | Alber, J. (2009) Impossible Storyworlds—and What to Do with Them. Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, University of Nebraska Press, 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1353/stw.0.0008 |
[3] | 尚必武. 非自然叙事学[J]. 外国文学, 2015(2): 95-111. |
[4] | 尚必武. 修辞诗学及当代叙事理论——詹姆斯·费伦教授访谈录[J]. 当代外国文学, 2010, 31(2): 153-159. |
[5] | 李亚飞, 尚必武. 非自然叙事学的缘起、流变与发展态势——西方非自然叙事学研究述评[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2020, 43(1): 77-84. |