|
异质性视角下制造业服务化驱动高质量发展研究
|
Abstract:
在服务业增值占国内生产总值比重不断上升的背景下,服务业逐渐成为经济增长的核心动力,服务业与制造业的融合为经济高质量发展注入了新的活力。本文通过从产业关联溢出、技术创新、成本节约和资源再配置四个角度阐述了制造业服务化驱动经济高质量发展的理论机制。为检验理论,本研究建立了高质量发展的综合评价指标体系,并进行了实证分析。结果表明,制造业服务化在促进经济高质量发展方面效果显著。然而,异质性检验揭示了在东部地区和经济不发达地区,其影响更为显著,且主要对资本密集型制造业的高质量发展具有显著推动作用。因此,本文建议政府相关部门促进制造业与服务业之间的深度整合,并制定具有地域特色的制造业服务化发展策略。同时,应解除制造业服务化转型的政策机制限制,并通过技术创新提升制造业的高质量发展水平。本文的研究不仅丰富了关于制造业服务化与经济高质量发展关系的理论,同时也为政策制定者提供了有价值的参考。
In the context of the service industry’s growing contribution to GDP, it has emerged as a primary driver of economic growth. The merging of service and manufacturing industries has revitalized high-quality economic development. This paper expounds the theoretical mechanism of manufacturing service-oriented driving high-quality economic development from four perspectives: industrial spillover, technological innovation, cost saving and resource reallocation. In order to test the theory, this study establishes the comprehensive evaluation index system of high quality development, and carries on the empirical analysis. The results indicate that manufacturing servitization significantly fosters high-quality economic development. However, the heterogeneity analysis reveals that its impact is most pronounced in the eastern region and economically underdeveloped areas. Notably, it demonstrates a substantial promoting effect on the high-quality development of capital-intensive manufacturing industries. As a result, government authorities should encourage the comprehensive integration of manufacturing and service sectors; tailored strategies for manufacturing service-oriented development should be devised based on regional differences, breaking policy constraints and boosting the manufacturing sector’s growth to a high standard via technological advancements. The research in this paper not only enriches the theory of the relationship between manufacturing servitization and high-quality economic development, but also provides a valuable reference for policy makers.
[1] | Amiti, M. and Wei, S. (2009) Service Offshoring and Productivity: Evidence from the US. The World Economy, 32, 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2008.01149.x |
[2] | 祝树金, 谢煜, 段凡. 制造业服务化、技术创新与企业出口产品质量[J]. 经济评论, 2019(6): 3-16. |
[3] | 窦大鹏, 匡增杰. 制造业服务化与全球价值链位置提升——基于制造业企业的分析[J]. 国际商务研究, 2022, 13(1): 46-58. |
[4] | 郑瑛琨. 经济高质量发展视角下先进制造业数字化赋能研究[J]. 理论探讨, 2020(6): 134-137. |
[5] | 刘明. 物流业与制造业协同集聚对经济高质量发展的影响——基于283个地级以上城市的实证分析[J]. 中国流通经济, 2021, 35(9): 22-31. |
[6] | 李蕾, 刘荣增. 产业融合与制造业高质量发展: 基于协同创新的中介效应[J]. 经济经纬, 2022, 39(2): 78-87. |
[7] | 陈丽娴, 魏作磊. 制造业服务化驱动中国经济高质量发展的理论逻辑与实证检验[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2022, 38(6): 130-143. |
[8] | 杜传忠, 金华旺. 制造业产融结合、资本配置效率与企业全要素生产率[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2021, 42(2): 28-40. |
[9] | Haven, T. and Marel, E. (2018) Servicification of Manufacturing and Boosting Productivity through Services Sector Reform in Türkiye. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank Group. |
[10] | 彭继宗, 郭克莎. 制造业投入服务化与服务投入结构优化对制造业生产率的影响[J]. 经济评论, 2022(2): 17-35. |
[11] | Kastalli, I.V. and Van Looy, B. (2013) Servitization: Disentangling the Impact of Service Business Model Innovation on Manufacturing Firm Performance. Journal of Operations Management, 31, 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2013.02.001 |
[12] | 李振洋, 金文翰. 市场竞争环境下的制造业服务化与绿色全要素生产率[J]. 河北经贸大学学报, 2022, 43(5): 36-44. |
[13] | 周念利, 郝治军, 吕云龙. 制造业中间投入服务化水平与企业全要素生产率——基于中国微观数据的经验研究[J]. 亚太经济, 2017(1): 138-146, 176. |
[14] | 王岚. 投入服务化是否提高了中国制造业全要素生产率[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2020(2): 29-43. |
[15] | 姜博, 马胜利, 唐晓华. 产业融合对中国装备制造业创新效率的影响: 结构嵌入的调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(9): 77-86. |
[16] | 王思语, 郑乐凯. 制造业服务化是否促进了出口产品升级——基于出口产品质量和出口技术复杂度双重视角[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2019(11): 45-60. |
[17] | 孙豪, 桂河清, 杨冬. 中国省际经济高质量发展的测度与评价[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2020(8): 4-14, 155. |
[18] | 吕平, 袁易明. 产业协同集聚、技术创新与经济高质量发展——基于生产性服务业与高技术制造业实证分析[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2020, 41(6): 118-125. |