全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

我国行政协议纠纷救济机制研究
Research on the Relief Mechanism of Administrative Agreement Dispute in China

DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2024.1210833, PP. 5857-5862

Keywords: 行政协议,纠纷救济,完善建议
Administrative Agreement
, Dispute Relief, Improvement Suggestions

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

行政协议作为政府实现行政管理或公共利益目标的一种新型方式,其“柔性”特征更符合现代法治民主的观念,在我国的使用日益频繁。行政协议的使用必然会导致纠纷的产生,我国法律虽规定了一定的救济途径,但实践中仍存在着许多不足。本文在探讨我国行政协议纠纷救济机制的不足之处的基础上,通过对法国、德国以及美国的相关救济机制的研究,提出对我国救济机制的完善建议,以应对当前行政协议纠纷频发的现实情况。
As a new way for the government to realize the goal of administrative management or public interest, the “flexible” features of administrative agreement are more in line with the concept of modern rule of law and democracy, and are used more and more frequently in our country. The use of administrative agreements will inevitably lead to disputes. Although the law of our country provides certain remedies, there are still many deficiencies in practice. On the basis of discussing the inadequacies of China’s administrative agreement dispute relief mechanism, this paper puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of China’s relief mechanism through the research of the relevant relief mechanisms in France, Germany and the United States, so as to cope with the reality of frequent administrative agreement dispute.

References

[1]  张卫宏. 行政协议纠纷解决机制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2021.
[2]  余凌云. 行政契约论[M]. 第2版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2006: 118-129.
[3]  刘莘, 刘红星. 行政纠纷解决机制研究[J]. 行政法学研究, 2016(4): 3-19.
[4]  王天蔚, 刘锐. 我国国家公园特许经营制度的价值、现存问题与发展建议[J]. 林草资源研究, 2023(6): 8-17.
[5]  王名扬. 美国行政法[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016: 419, 486-491.
[6]  吴朝阳. 论行政合同项下的行政优益权[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国政法大学, 2012.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133