|
论恩格斯《反杜林论》中的暴力论思想
|
Abstract:
十九世纪七十年代,杜林从唯心主义的观点、立场和方法出发,对马克思主义进行全面攻击。对此,恩格斯撰写《反杜林论》以批判杜林的错误观点,捍卫马克思的唯物史观。本文拟就《反杜林论》第二编“政治经济学”中的“暴力论”三章进行解读。本文拟从三个部分对恩格斯《反杜林论》中的暴力论进行研究:第一,阐述恩格斯“暴力论”的写作背景,主要从历史背景和理论背景两方面进行分析。第二,阐述恩格斯暴力论的主要观点。杜林只从抽象层面谈论暴力与经济的关系。恩格斯在“暴力论”三章中,从抽象与具体、历史与现实层面出发,论述了经济在最终层面决定暴力,并从暴力对经济的依赖以及政治状况与经济发展的关系两方面进行分析。第三,重点回归到现实,阐明恩格斯的暴力论观点对于唯物史观发展的启示和现代发展的启发。在“暴力论”的文本中,恩格斯要表达的中心思想是经济即物质生产方式在最终层面决定政治暴力。理解恩格斯暴力论的主要思想,才能更进一步理解历史唯物主义。
In the 1870s, Dühring launched a comprehensive attack on Marxism from the viewpoint, position and method of idealism. In response, Engels wrote Anti-Dühring to criticize Dühring’s erroneous views and defend Marx’s historical materialism. In this paper, we are going to explain the three chapters of “The Theory of Violence” in the second part of the Anti-Dühring, “Political Economy”. In Anti-Dühring, Engels uses three chapters of “The Theory of Violence” to refute Dühring’s theory of violence, which shows the importance Engels attached to the issue of violence. This paper intends to study the theory of violence in Engels’ Anti-Dühring in three parts: firstly, to explain the background of Engels’ “The Theory of Violence”, mainly from two aspects: historical background and theoretical background. Secondly, the main points of Engels’ theory of violence are explained. Dühring only talks about the relationship between violence and economy in the abstract. In the three chapters of “The Theory of Violence”, Engels discusses the economy as the ultimate determinant of violence from the abstract and concrete, historical and realistic levels, and analyzes the dependence of violence on the economy and the relationship between political conditions and economic development. Thirdly, the focus returns to reality and illustrates the inspiration of Engels’ view on violence for the development of the materialistic view of history and for modern development. In the text of “The Theory of Violence”, the central idea Engels wanted to express is that the economy, i.e. the material mode of production, determines political violence at the ultimate level. By understanding the main ideas of Engels’ theory of violence, we can further understand historical materialism.
[1] | 洪光东, 刘旺旺. “马克思恩格斯与当代社会主义暨纪念恩格斯逝世120周年国际学术研讨会”综述[J]. 马克思主义与现实, 2015(6): 197-198. |
[2] | 冯景源. 唯物史观形成史研究及其意义[J]. 东南学术, 2013(2): 4-12. |
[3] | 覃正爱, 郭江勇. 恩格斯对唯物史观的贡献新论[J]. 江汉论坛, 2020(2): 17-23. |
[4] | 恩格斯. 反杜林论[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2018. |
[5] | 赵家祥. 对经济基础决定上层建筑原理的深刻阐释——《反杜林论》中“暴力论”三章的解读[J]. 马克思主义理论学科研究, 2017, 3(5): 14-23. |
[6] | 梅荣政, 姚锡长. 每个觉醒工人必读的书籍(下)——恩格斯《反杜林论》对唯物主义历史观的科学论述[J]. 高校理论战线, 2011(5): 26-30. |
[7] | 马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集(第26卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2014. |
[8] | 张俊. 恩格斯“暴力论”思想研究——从“经济在归根结蒂层面上的作用”看[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 金华: 浙江师范大学, 2014. |
[9] | 刘阳科. 《反杜林论》中的唯物史观阐述及其当代意义——基于“暴力论”三章[J]. 实事求是, 2019(4): 44-50. |
[10] | 关勋夏. “暴力是每一个孕育着新社会的旧社会的助产婆”——读恩格斯《暴力论》[J]. 军事历史研究, 2001(3): 19-34. |
[11] | 王中汝. 暴力的作用及其限度——论马克思恩格斯的暴力革命思想[J]. 理论视野, 2019(1): 16-21. |
[12] | 袁秉达, 卢肖文. 恩格斯晚年坚持和发展马克思主义的新贡献[J]. 科学社会主义, 2020(5): 4-10. |
[13] | 杨宏伟, 卢孔亿. 恩格斯对杜林虚无主义的批判与启示——基于《反杜林论》的文本研究[J]. 思想教育研究, 2021(7): 70-75. |
[14] | 吴兴德. 恩格斯论“经济和政治的相互关系”及其当代价值——基于《暴力在历史中的作用》的考察[J]. 马克思主义哲学, 2021(3): 78-87, 128. |