全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

ESG表现、融资约束对于企业价值的影响——基于2018~2022年沪深A股上市公司数据的分析
ESG Performance, Financing Constraints on Firm Value—Analysis Based on Data of Listed Companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-Shares, 2018~2022

DOI: 10.12677/orf.2024.145454, PP. 100-110

Keywords: ESG表现,融资约束,企业价值
ESG Performance
, Financing Constraints, Enterprise Value

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文以2018至2022年间中国A股市场的非金融行业上市公司为研究对象,深入探究了ESG表现和融资约束对企业价值的影响。研究结果显示,ESG表现对企业价值有积极的推动作用,而融资约束在其中起到一定的中介作用。通过异质性分析发现,非国有企业和高管兼任的情况表现出更为显著的效应,这可能更有助于提高公司的投资效率,从而促进企业价值的提升。本文的发现对于理解ESG表现与企业价值之间的关系具有重要意义,企业应深刻意识到ESG理念的重要性,并主动公开ESG相关信息;政府应出台激励企业绿色创新的政策;投资者则应优先选择ESG表现良好的企业进行投资。这些举措将共同助力“双碳”目标的实现,并为相关方提供有益的参考。
This paper takes non-financial industry listed companies in China’s A-share market between 2018 and 2022 as the research object, and deeply explores the impact of ESG performance and financing constraints on enterprise value. The findings show that ESG performance has a positive driving effect on firm value, while financing constraints play a mediating role in it. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that non-state-owned firms and executives with concurrent positions show more significant effects, which may be more helpful in improving the firm’s investment efficiency, thus contributing to firm value. The findings of this paper are of great significance to the understanding of the relationship between ESG performance and firm value. Firms should be aware of the importance of ESG concepts and take the initiative to disclose ESG-related information; the government should introduce policies to incentivize firms to innovate in a green way; and investors should give preference to investing in firms with good ESG performance. Together, these initiatives will help realize the goal of “dual carbon” and provide useful references for all parties concerned.

References

[1]  张淑惠, 史玄玄, 文雷. 环境信息披露能提升企业价值吗?——来自中国沪市的经验证据[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2011(6): 166-173.
[2]  吴梦云, 张林荣. 高管团队特质、环境责任及企业价值研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 2018, 32(2): 122-129.
[3]  Mittal, R.K., Sinha, N. and Singh, A. (2008) An Analysis of Linkage between Economic Value Added and Corporate Social Responsibility. Management Decision, 46, 1437-1443.
https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810912037
[4]  Mishra, D.R. (2015) Post-Innovation CSR Performance and Firm Value. Journal of Business Ethics, 140, 285-306.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2676-3
[5]  Harjoto, M. and Laksmana, I. (2016) The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Risk Taking and Firm Value. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 353-373.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3202-y
[6]  刘晓明, 王行健, 曾剑宇. 强制企业社会责任披露对同行企业价值的影响--基于股票市场反应的证据[J]. 投资研究, 2024, 43(3): 20-42.
[7]  Fama, E.F. and Jensen, M.C. (1983) Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.
https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
[8]  岳璟怡. ESG中的公司治理信息披露对企业价值的影响[J]. 商业会计, 2023(2): 49-54.
[9]  孙永祥, 黄祖辉. 上市公司的股权结构与绩效[J]. 经济研究, 1999(12): 23-30+39.
[10]  林钟高, 郑军, 王书珍. 内部控制与企业价值研究——来自沪深两市A股的经验分析[J]. 财经研究, 2007, 33(4): 132-143.
[11]  王琳璘, 廉永辉, 董捷. ESG表现对企业价值的影响机制研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2022(5): 23-34.
[12]  杨雪. 新准则下加强企业单位管理会计应用的探讨[J]. 中国市场, 2023(1): 151-153.
[13]  袁建国, 范文林, 程晨, 等. CFO兼任董事能促进公司提高投资效率吗?——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 管理评论, 2017, 29(3): 62-73.
[14]  宋衍蘅, 毕煜晗, 文雯. “监督效应‘VS’掏空效应”: 高管纵向兼任与审计决策[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2022(11): 52-64.
[15]  张琳, 赵海涛. 企业环境、社会和公司治理(ESG)表现影响企业价值吗?——基于A股上市公司的实证研究[J]. 武汉金融, 2019(10): 36-43.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133