|
小间距并行桥梁联合壅水影响评价分析
|
Abstract:
针对并行桥梁现行防洪评价规范中采用的壅水计算经验公式并未考虑小间距并行桥梁联合壅水的影响,本文以实际工程为例,通过数值模拟与规范公式对比计算,分析了并行桥梁桥位间距、桥梁跨径对联合壅水高度与范围的影响。结果表明:相较于单个桥梁的桥墩布置对壅水的影响,并行桥梁的桥墩布置会产生更高的壅水高度和更广的壅水范围,小间距并行桥梁对河道防洪能力的影响不可忽视;经验公式和流速水头差法的壅水计算结果与数值模拟所得结果差距较大,需要考虑并行桥梁背景下的壅水计算公式修正。本文的研究成果为并行桥梁的设计提供了防洪计算依据,对确保并行桥梁本身和河道的安全具有现实意义。
In response to the empirical formula for calculating backwater used in the current flood control evaluation standards for parallel bridges, which does not take into account the influence of small-spacing parallel bridges on the joint damming, this paper takes actual engineering as an example and compares numerical simulation with the standard formula to analyze the influence of the spacing and span of parallel bridge positions on the height and range of the joint damming. The results show that compared to the impact of the arrangement of bridge piers for a single bridge on backwater, the arrangement of bridge piers for parallel bridges will result in higher height and wider range of backwater. The impact of small-spacing parallel bridges on the flood control capacity of the river can not be ignored. The difference between the calculation results of the empirical formula and the head difference method for backwater and the numerical simulation results is significant, and it is necessary to consider the correction of the backwater calculation formula under the background of parallel bridges. The research results of this article provide a flood control calculation basis for the design of parallel bridges, which has practical significance for ensuring the safety of parallel bridges themselves and rivers.
[1] | 毛北平, 钟艳红, 肖潇. 基于实测资料的桥墩壅水计算经验公式比较研究[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(12): 157-161. |
[2] | 王开, 傅旭东, 王光谦. 桥墩壅水的计算方法比较[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2006, 4(6): 53-55. |
[3] | Wardhana, K. and Hadipriono, F.C. (2003) Analysis of Recent Bridge Failures in the United States. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 17, 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2003)17:3(144) |
[4] | 范友平, 果有娜, 任朔. 凉水河北京南站段壅水特性数值模拟研究[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2011, 9(5): 92-94. |
[5] | 吴时强, 薛万云, 吴修锋, 等. 城市行洪河道桥群阻水叠加效应量化研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2019, 41(10): 96-102. |
[6] | 骆文广, 陆晶, 赖昊, 等. 近距多座并行桥梁墩前壅水研究[J]. 四川大学学报(工程科学版), 2015, 47(4): 6-13. |
[7] | 刘新生, 伍佳玉, 钟晓山, 等. JTG C30-2002公路工程水文勘测设计规范[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国交通部, 2002. |
[8] | 方根男, 孙学祥, 王槐青, 等. TB 10017-1999铁路工程水文勘测设计规范[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国国家铁路局, 1999. |
[9] | 李炜. 水利计算手册[M]. 第2版. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2006. |
[10] | 张旭. 不同行业桥梁壅水计算公式比较分析[J]. 东北水利水电, 2015, 33(10): 4-5. |
[11] | 任梅芳, 徐宗学, 苏广新. 基于二维水动力模型与经验公式的桥梁壅水计算及其对比分析[J]. 水力发电学报, 2017, 36(5): 78-87. |
[12] | 孙治平, 赵志宏, 刘子金, 等. 基于MIKE21的跨河桥梁壅水数值模拟分析[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2022, 33(6): 129-136. |
[13] | Hong, Y.M., Chang, M.L., Lin, H.C., Kan, Y.C. and Lin, C.C. (2011) Experimental Study on Clear Water Scour around Bridge Piers. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 121, 162-166. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.121-126.162 |