教育神经科学,体育教师,专业发展,新课程标准
Educational Neuroscience, Physical Education Teachers, Professional Development, New Curriculum Standards, Open Access Library" />
|
教育神经科学视域下体育教师专业发展的现实挑战、应对策略与实现路径
|
Abstract:
本文分析了新课程标准对体育教师能力的新要求,包括跨学科整合能力、教学创新能力、科学评价能力和知识更新能力。同时,指出了体育教师专业发展面临的挑战,如知识结构更新不足、教学方法创新不够和科学评价能力不足。从教育神经科学视角,讨论了教育神经科学引入体育教育中的证据基础,包括运动与脑发育、认知功能、个体差异、多感官学习、情境化学习及神经反馈技术等方面。最后,提出构建基于脑科学的体育教师培养体系、开发基于神经科学的体育教学策略和建立持续性的专业发展机制等实现路径。本研究旨在为体育教师专业发展提供科学指导,以适应新时代教育改革的需求。
This study analyzes the new requirements for physical education teachers' competencies as stipulated by the revised curriculum standards. These requirements encompass interdisciplinary integration skills, pedagogical innovation capabilities, scientific assessment proficiencies, and knowledge renewal aptitudes. Concurrently, the study elucidates the challenges confronting the professional development of physical education teachers, including inadequate updating of knowledge structures, insufficient innovation in teaching methodologies, and deficiencies in scientific evaluation competencies. The paper also points out the challenges faced in the professional development of physical education teachers, such as insufficient knowledge structure renewal, lack of teaching method innovation, and inadequate scientific evaluation ability. Furthermore, it discusses the application of educational neuroscience in physical education, including the relationship between exercise and brain development, cognitive functions, individual differences, multisensory learning, contextualized learning, and the application of neurofeedback technology. Finally, it proposes implementation paths such as constructing a brain-science-based teacher training system, developing neuroscientifically informed teaching strategies, and establishing sustainable professional development mechanisms. This study aims to provide scientific guidance for the professional development of physical education teachers to adapt to the needs of the new era of educational reform.
[1] | 中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部关于印发义务教育课程方案和课程标准(2022年版)的通知[EB/OL]. 2022-04-20. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A26/s8001/202204/t20220420_619921.html, 2022-07-02. |
[2] | 伍红林, 田莉莉. 跨学科主题学习: 溯源、内涵与实施建议[J]. 全球教育展望, 2023, 52(3): 35-46. |
[3] | 陈一林, 张文鹏, 刘斌. 基于活动理论的体育与健康课程跨学科主题学习活动设计路径研究[J]. 体育学研究, 2023, 37(3): 66-75. |
[4] | 张文鹏, 吴安月, 陈一林, 等. 从问题到实践: 体育与健康跨学科主题学习的教学策略研究[J]. 天津体育学院学报, 2024, 39(3): 302-308, 317. |
[5] | 陈雁飞, 张庆新. 《课程标准(2022年版)》教学建议分析与落实[J]. 中国学校体育, 2022, 41(6): 28-32. |
[6] | 季浏. 新版义教课标: 构建以核心素养为纲的体育与健康课程体系[J]. 上海体育学院学报, 2022, 46(6): 1-9. |
[7] | 汪晓赞. 《义务教育体育与健康课程标准(2022年版)》的课程内容结构与特色[J]. 首都体育学院学报, 2022, 34(3): 241-252, 274. |
[8] | 张庆新, 赵卫新. 例析体育课时可检测学习目标制订的三要素: 条件、行为与标准[J]. 中国学校体育, 2019(12): 25-26. |
[9] | 梅兵, 周彬. 新时代高水平师范大学的育人使命与教育担当[J]. 教育研究, 2022, 43(4): 136-142. |
[10] | 汪晓赞, 杨燕国, 徐勤萍. 新世纪以来我国基础教育体育与健康课程标准的继承与发展[J]. 西安体育学院学报, 2022, 39(5): 569-576. |
[11] | Immordino-Yang, M.H. and Damasio, A. (2007) We Feel, Therefore We Learn: The Relevance of Affective and Social Neuroscience to Education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1, 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.x |
[12] | Geake, J. (2008) Neuromythologies in Education. Educational Research, 50, 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880802082518 |
[13] | Roediger, H.L. and Butler, A.C. (2011) The Critical Role of Retrieval Practice in Long-Term Retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003 |
[14] | Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W. and Perry, R.P. (2002) Academic Emotions in Students’ Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3702_4 |
[15] | Goswami, U. (2006) Neuroscience and Education: From Research to Practice? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 406-413. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1907 |
[16] | 黄俊杰, 谷智达. 从经验走向实证: 教育神经科学视域下的教师专业发展[J]. 中小学管理, 2023(12): 19-24. |
[17] | Hillman, C.H., Erickson, K.I. and Kramer, A.F. (2008) Be Smart, Exercise Your Heart: Exercise Effects on Brain and Cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 58-65. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2298 |
[18] | Erickson, K.I., Voss, M.W., Prakash, R.S., Basak, C., Szabo, A., Chaddock, L., et al. (2011) Exercise Training Increases Size of Hippocampus and Improves Memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 3017-3022. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015950108 |
[19] | Best, J.R. (2010) Effects of Physical Activity on Children’s Executive Function: Contributions of Experimental Research on Aerobic Exercise. Developmental Review, 30, 331-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2010.08.001 |
[20] | Diamond, A. and Ling, D.S. (2016) Conclusions about Interventions, Programs, and Approaches for Improving Executive Functions That Appear Justified and Those That, Despite Much Hype, Do Not. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.005 |
[21] | Pesce, C., Crova, C., Marchetti, R., Struzzolino, I., Masci, I., Vannozzi, G., et al. (2013) Searching for Cognitively Optimal Challenge Point in Physical Activity for Children with Typical and Atypical Motor Development. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 6, 172-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2013.07.001 |
[22] | Tomporowski, P.D., McCullick, B., Pendleton, D.M. and Pesce, C. (2015) Exercise and Children’s Cognition: The Role of Exercise Characteristics and a Place for Metacognition. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4, 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2014.09.003 |
[23] | Shams, L. and Seitz, A.R. (2008) Benefits of Multisensory Learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 411-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006 |
[24] | Rosenbaum, D.A., Chapman, K.M., Weigelt, M., Weiss, D.J. and van der Wel, R. (2012) Cognition, Action, and Object Manipulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 924-946. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027839 |
[25] | Brown, J.S., Collins, A. and Duguid, P. (1989) Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x018001032 |
[26] | Mirifar, A., Beckmann, J. and Ehrlenspiel, F. (2017) Neurofeedback as Supplementary Training for Optimizing Athletes’ Performance: A Systematic Review with Implications for Future Research. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 75, 419-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.005 |
[27] | Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M. and Palincsar, A. (1991) Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139 |
[28] | Ansari, D., Coch, D. and De Smedt, B. (2011) Connecting Education and Cognitive Neuroscience: Where Will the Journey Take Us? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43, 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00705.x |
[29] | Tech Institute. Master in Neuroeducation and Physical Education. https://www.techtitute.com/cn/sports-science/professional-master-degree/master-neuroeducation-physical-education-sport |
[30] | Howard-Jones, P.A. (2014) Neuroscience and Education: Myths and Messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 817-824. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3817 |
[31] | Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2011) Mind, Brain, and Education Science: A Comprehensive Guide to the New Brain-Based Teaching. WW Norton & Company. |
[32] | Rizzolatti, G. and Craighero, L. (2004) The Mirror-Neuron System. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230 |
[33] | Wolpert, D.M., Diedrichsen, J. and Flanagan, J.R. (2011) Principles of Sensorimotor Learning. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 739-751. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3112 |
[34] | 陈爱国教授课题组. 陈爱国教授《体脑双优: 基于体育神经科学的体育实践课程研究与实践》[EB/OL]. http://sportbrain.cn/view.php?id=168, 2023-07-26. |
[35] | Pekrun, R. (2006) The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9 |
[36] | Stein, Z. and Fischer, K.W. (2011) Directions for Mind, Brain, and Education: Methods, Models, and Morality. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43, 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00708.x |
[37] | Ansari, D. and Coch, D. (2006) Bridges over Troubled Waters: Education and Cognitive Neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 146-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.007 |
[38] | Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (2005) Participatory Action Research: Communicative Action and the Public Sphere. In: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S., Eds., The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd Edition, Sage Publications, 559-603. |
[39] | Goswami, U. (2008) Principles of Learning, Implications for Teaching: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42, 381-399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00639.x |
[40] | Babiloni, F. and Astolfi, L. (2014) Social Neuroscience and Hyperscanning Techniques: Past, Present and Future. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 44, 76-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.07.006 |
[41] | Hardiman, M., Rinne, L., Gregory, E. and Yarmolinskaya, J. (2011) Neuroethics, Neuroeducation, and Classroom Teaching: Where the Brain Sciences Meet Pedagogy. Neuroethics, 5, 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9116-6 |