|
新业态灵活就业人员就业质量评价与影响因素研究
|
Abstract:
文章采用问卷调查和访谈法相结合的方式,选择杭州市部分新业态灵活就业人员为对象,从工作特征、职业发展、薪酬待遇和社会保险参与情况四个方面对杭州市新业态灵活就业人员的就业质量进行评价。结果发现,新业态灵活就业人员整体就业质量水平偏低,主要受到个体特征、人力资本特征和社会资本特征的影响。针对调查结论,根据新业态灵活就业人员职业特征,建议强化政府、就业平台和新业态灵活就业人员三方主体责任,完善政策措施,提升新业态灵活就业人员就业质量水平。
The study utilizes a combination of questionnaire surveys and interviews to focus on flexible employees in new forms of employment in Hangzhou, assessing their employment quality in terms of job characteristics, career development, compensation, and social insurance participation. The findings reveal that the overall employment quality for these flexible workers is relatively low, primarily influenced by their individual, human capital, and social capital characteristics. In light of these findings and considering the occupational characteristics of flexible workers in new forms of employment, it is recommended to reinforce the responsibilities of the government, employment platforms, and flexible workers themselves, to refine policy measures and elevate the employment quality for flexible workers in new forms of employment.
[1] | 张成刚. 就业发展的未来趋势, 新就业形态的概念及影响分析[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2016(19): 86-91. |
[2] | 谢富胜, 吴越. 零工经济是一种劳资双赢的新型用工关系吗[J]. 经济学家, 2019(6): 5-14. |
[3] | Sehnbruch, K., González, P., Apablaza, M., Méndez, R. and Arriagada, V. (2020) The Quality of Employment (QoE) in Nine Latin American Countries: A Multidimensional Perspective. World Development, 127, Article 104738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104738 |
[4] | 李红霞, 刘款, 杨永健, 张建武. 一线城市硕士研究生就业质量评价影响因素及提升路径研究[J]. 西北人口, 2022(2): 114-115. |
[5] | 丁守海, 夏璋煦, 徐政. 平台就业能改善就业质量吗——基于专项调查的分析[J]. 中共中央党校(国家行政学院)学报, 2022(12): 101-102. |
[6] | 尹晓菲, 杨昱梅. 以“就业质量提升”为导向的高校就业质量评价体系优化研究[J]. 中国职业技术教育, 2019(10): 90-91. |
[7] | 苏丽锋, 高东燕. 欧盟内部移民流动特征与就业质量研究[J]. 中国人口科学, 2019(5): 56-68. |
[8] | 司小飞, 李麦收. 数字经济、就业结构与就业质量——基于中国省域数据的实证分析[J]. 西北人口, 2022(4): 56-58. |
[9] | 唐宁, 谢勇. 留守经历对劳动者就业质量的影响[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019(12): 48-64. |
[10] | 张成刚. 新就业形态的类别特征与发展策略[J]. 学习与实践, 2018(3): 14-20. |