Long-Term Impacts of Tree Architectures and Branch Configurations on Tree Growth, Yield, Fruit Quality Attributes, and Leaf Minerals in “Aztec Fuji” Apple
Canopy and branch architectures in high-density orchards can be crucial in production and fruit quality. The influence of two canopy orientations (Upright and Tilted) in combination with two arm (branch) architectures (Shortened or Overlapped) on tree growth, yield components, fruit quality, and leaf mineral nutrients in an “Aztec Fuji” apple (Malus domestica Bork.) high-density orchard was studied over five years. Tilted trees with shortened arm configuration (TilShArm) always had significantly larger trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA) than Upright trees with an Overlapped arm configuration (UpOverArm) every year from 2012 to 2016. Trees with a TilShArm system had more cumulative fruit per tree than those with an Upright orientation. Trees with a tilted canopy (TilShArm and TilOverArm) tended to have higher yield per tree and yield per hectare than those with an upright system. Trees with a TilShArm system were more precocious and had more yield per tree than those with an upright canopy orientation in 2012. When values were polled over five years, trees with an upright canopy-shortened arm system (UpShArm) treatment had a lower biennial bearing index (BBI) than those with an upright canopy-overlapped system (UpOverArm). Trees receiving an arm shortening (UpShArm or TilShArm) configuration often had larger fruits than those with overlapped arms (UpOverArm and TilOverArm). Fruit from trees receiving an UpOverArm had higher fruit firmness than those from trees with other canopy-branch arrangements at harvest due to their smaller size. Fruit from trees with a TilShArm and TilOverArm had significantly higher water core and bitter pit but lower sunburn than trees with an upright canopy (UpShArm and UpOverArm). Leaves from trees with an UpOverArm canopy-branch configuration had the lowest leaf Ca but the highest leaf K and Fe concentrations among all treatments.
References
[1]
Autio, W.R., Hayden, R.A., Micke, W.C. and Brown, G.R. (1996) Rootstock Affects Ripening, Color, and Shape of “Starkspur Supreme Delicious” Apples in the 1984 NC-140 Cooperative Planting. Fruit Variety Journal, 50, 45-53.
[2]
Fallahi, E., Colt, W.M. and Fallahi, B. (2001) Optimum Ranges of Leaf Nitrogen for Yield, Fruit Quality, and Photosynthesis in “BC-2 Fuji”. Apple. Journal of American Pomology Society, 55, 68-75.
[3]
Fallahi, E., Arzani, K. and Fallahi, B. (2013) Long-Term Leaf Mineral Nutrition in “Pacific Gala” Apple (Malus×Domesticaborkh.) as Affected by Rootstock Type and Irrigation System during Six Stages of Tree Development. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 88, 685-692. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2013.11513025
[4]
Hoying, S.A. (2012) Experiences with Support Systems for the Tall Spindle Apple Planting System. New York Fruit Quarterly, 20, 3-8.
[5]
Hampson, C.R., Quamme, H.A. and Brownlee, R.T. (2002) Canopy Growth, Yield, and Fruit Quality of “Royal Gala” Apple Trees Grown for Eight Years in Five Tree Training Systems. HortScience, 37, 627-631. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.37.4.627
[6]
Dallabetta, N., Costa, F., Pasqualini, J., Wehrens, R., Noferini, M. and Costa, G. (2014) The Influence of Training System on Apple Fruit Quality. Acta Horticulturae, 1058, 55-62. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2014.1058.4
[7]
Gandev, S., Nanev, I, Savov, P.R., Isuf, E., Kornov, G. and Serbezova, D. (2016) The Effect of Three Training Systems on the Vegetative and Reproductive Habits of the Apple Cultivar “Braeburn” Grafted on M9 Rootstocks. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 22, 600-603.
[8]
Kappel, F. and Quamme, H.A. (1993) Orchard Training Systems Influence Early Canopy Development and Light Microclimate within Apple Tree Canopies. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 73, 237-248. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps93-038
[9]
He, L. and Schupp, J. (2018) Sensing and Automation in Pruning of Apple Trees: A Review. Agronomy, 8, Article 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8100211
[10]
Robinson, T.L., Hoying, S.A. and Reginato, G.H. (2006) The Tall Spindle Apple Production System. New York Fruit Quarterly, 14, 21-28.
[11]
Fallahi, E., Kiester, M.J., Fallahi, B. and Mahdavi, S. (2018) Rootstock, Canopy Architecture, Bark Girdling, and Scoring Influence on Growth, Productivity, and Fruit Quality at Harvest in “Aztec Fuji” Apple. HortScience, 53, 1629-1633. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci13348-18
[12]
Clements, J. (2011) “Mini” Apple Orchard Systems Trial: A Comparison of Central-Leader, Vertical-Axis, and Tall-Spindle Apple Orchard Systems on Three Different Rootstocks. Fruit Notes, 76, 10-13.
[13]
Mahdavi, S., Fallahi, E., Lang, G.A. and Fallahi, B. (2020) Gibberellic Acid4+7 and Benzyladenine, Cambium Disconnection, Nitrogen, and Tip Removal Influence on Branch Induction in Newly Planted Poorly Feathered “Fuji” Apple Trees. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 11, 496-509. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2020.113035
[14]
Schechter, I., Proctor, J.T.A. and Elfving, D.C. (1994) Apple Fruit Removal and Limb Girdling Affect Fruit and Leaf Characteristics. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 119, 157-162. https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.119.2.157
[15]
Fallahi, E., Fallahi, B. and Mahdavi, S. (2020) Branch Configuration Impacts on Production, Fruit Quality, and Leaf Minerals of “Aztec Fuji” Apple Trees in an Upright Single Row High-Density Orchard System over Five Years. Journal of Agricultural Science, 12, 53-63. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v12n4p53
[16]
Washington State University (2024) Washington State University Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center. https://tfrec.cahnrs.wsu.edu/
[17]
Proebsting, E. (1994) Strategy Development for Managing Drought. In: Williams, K.M. and Ley, T.W., Eds., Tree Fruit Irrigation. Good Fruit Grower, 39-50.
[18]
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. (1998) Crop Evapotranspiration. Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO. Irrigation and Drainage. Paper 56.
[19]
Goodwin, I. (2024). Cordon Tree Training Systems on Open Tatura Trellis. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235704197_Crop_evapotranspiration-Guidelines_for_computing_crop_water_requirements-FAO_Irrigation_and_drainage_paper_56
[20]
Chaplin, M.H. and Dixon, A.R. (1974) A Method for Analysis of Plant Tissue by Direct Reading Spark Emission Spectroscopy. Applied Spectroscopy, 28, 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1366/000370274774332894
[21]
Elsysy, M.A. and Hirst, P.M. (2017) The Role of Spur Leaves, Bourse Leaves, and Fruit on Local Flower Formation in Apple: An Approach to Understanding Biennial Bearing. HortScience, 52, 1229-1232. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci12136-17
[22]
Lakso, A. and Goffinet, M.C. (2013) Apple Fruit Growth. New York Fruit Quarterly, 21, 11-14.
[23]
Fallahi, E., Righetti, T.L. and Richardson, D.G. (1985) Predictions of Quality by Preharvest Fruit and Leaf Mineral Analyses in “Starkspur Golden Delicious” Apple. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 110, 524-527. https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.110.4.524
[24]
Baugher, T.A., Marini, R., Schupp, J.R. and Watkins, C.B. (2017) Prediction of Bitter Pit in ‘Honeycrisp’ Apples and Best Management Implications. HortScience, 52, 1368-1374. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci12266-17
[25]
Fallahi, E., Richardson, D.G., Westwood, M.N. and Chaplin, M.H. (1985) Relationships among Mineral Nutrition, Ethylene and Post-Harvest Physiology in Apples on Six Rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae, 25, 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(85)90087-1
[26]
Fallahi, E., Mahdavi, S., Kaiser, C. and Fallahi, B. (2019) Phytopigments, Proline, Chlorophyll Index, Yield and Leaf Nitrogen as Impacted by Rootstock, Training System, and Girdling in “Aztec Fuji” Apple. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 10, 1583-1598. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2019.109112
