全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Caesarean Section in the Mother and Child University Hospital of N’Djamena: Indications and Prognosis

DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2024.149117, PP. 1463-1470

Keywords: Caesarean Section, Indications, Prognosis NMCUH Tchad

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Introduction: Caesarean section is a surgical procedure which allows childbirth after opening the abdominal wall and the uterus. Objective: To study caesarean section in the N’Djamena Mother and Child University Hospital (NMCUH). Patients and Method: This was a cross-sectional, analytic descriptive study over a 5-month period from 10 January to 10 June 2023, focusing on caesarean sections section in the N’Djamena Mother and Child University Hospital (NMCUH). Studied variables were epidemiological, clinical and prognostic. Patients were divided according to the classification of Robson into 10 groups. Results: During the study period, we recorded 724 caesareans sections among 3,565 deliveries, giving a rate of 20.3%. The age group from 25 to 29 represented 39.2%. The average age was 31.2 ± 2.8 years, with extreme ranging from 14 to 44 years. Nulliparous women accounted for 42% and 26% had at least one previous caesarean section (n = 188). Patients with full-term pregnancies (37 - 40 gestational weeks + 6 days) represented 64.1%. Emergency caesareans accounted for 92.8% (n = 672). Robson’s group 1 was noted to be 40.3%. Hemorrhage was the main intraoperative complication, with 7.2%. In post-operatively, anemia was the main complication at 23.8%. We recorded 16 maternal deaths, giving a maternal death rate of 2.2%. Live newborns accounted for 81.1%. Conclusion: Caesarean section is a common procedure in the CHUME maternity unit. The main indications are those of Robson’s group I. Caesarean sections are associated with both maternal and fetal complications.

References

[1]  Fischbach, E. (2021) Comparison of the Evaluation of Caesarean Section Practices in a Type III Maternity Hospital and a Type IIA Maternity Hospital of the Same University Hospital Using Robson’s Classification in 2019 on a Population of Patients Carrying Live and Viable Fetuses. Med Thesis, University of Strasbourg.
[2]  Dumont, A. and Guilmoto, C.Z. (2020) Trop et pas assez à la fois: Le double fardeau de la césarienne. Population & Sociétés, 581, 1-4.
https://doi.org/10.3917/popsoc.581.0001
[3]  INSEED and UNICEF (2020) MICS6-Tchad 2019, Final Report.
https://anad.inseed.td/index.php/catalog/25
[4]  World Health Organization (2014) WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates.
https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/161443
[5]  Quenum, G., Memadji, M., Konan, B.R. and Nigue, L. (2001) Welffens-ekrac: Quality Caesarean Section, Analysis of Determinants at the University Hospital of Yopougon. International Journal of Medical Sciences, 3, 109-113.
[6]  A Some Der, S., Ouattara, D., Barro, A., Traoré, M. and Bamabara, B. (2010) Dao: Audit of Caesarean Sections in an African Environment. Rwandan Medical Journal, 64, 37-41.
[7]  Sissoko, H. (2006) Immediate Post-Caesarean Non-Infectious Complications at CSREF CV. Med Thesis, University of Mali.
[8]  Madoué, G.B. (2020) Time from Decision to Completion of Emergency Caesarean Section and Prognosis in N’djamena Mother and Child University Hospital. World Journal of Gynecology & Womens Health, 3, 1-4.
https://doi.org/10.33552/wjgwh.2020.03.000566
[9]  Mbungu, M., Ntela, M. and Kahindo, M. (2017) Frequency of Caesarean Sections According to the Robson Classification in 3 Maternity Units in the City of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. Annales Africaine de Médecine, 10, 74-79.
[10]  Hirani, B.A., Mchome, B.L., Mazuguni, N.S. and Mahande, M.J. (2017) The Decision Delivery Interval in Emergency Caesarean Section and Its Associated Maternal and Fetal Outcomes at a Referral Hospital in Northern Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17, Article No. 411.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1608-x
[11]  Pallasmaa, N., Ekblad, U., Aitokallio‐Tallberg, A., Uotila, J., Raudaskoski, T., Ulander, V., et al. (2010) Cesarean Delivery in Finland: Maternal Complications and Obstetric Risk Factors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 89, 896-902.
https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349.2010.487893
[12]  Lucas, D.N., Yentis, S.M., Kinsella, S.M., Holdcroft, A., May, A.E., Wee, M., et al. (2000) Urgency of Caesarean Section: A New Classification. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 93, 346-350.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680009300703
[13]  Mihimit, A. (2018) Frequency of Caesarean Section According to Robson’s Classification: Case of the N’DJamena Mother and Child University Hospital from July 2016 to June 2017. DES Mémoire, Université de N’Djaména.
[14]  Pyykönen, A., Gissler, M., Løkkegaard, E., Bergholt, T., Rasmussen, S.C., Smárason, A., et al. (2017) Cesarean Section Trends in the Nordic Countries—A Comparative Analysis with the Robson Classification. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 96, 607-616.
https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13108
[15]  Hounkpatin, B., Aboubakar, M., Dangbemey, P., Tognifode, V., Schantz, C., Dumont, A., et al. (2020) Practice of the Caesarean Section in Four Maternities in Benin Using Robson Classification. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10, 65-75.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2020.101006
[16]  Kanjanakaew, A., Driessnack, M. and Tilden, E.L. (2022) Cesarean Birth among Women Birthing in Asia: A Literature Synthesis Using the Robson 10-Group Classification System. Asian Journal of Pregnancy and Childbirth, 5, 15-32.
[17]  Donigolo, B. (2017) Evaluation of Caesarean Section Indications According to the Robson Classification and Main Indications in a Dakar Urban Centre from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2016. Mémoire pour l’obtension de Diplôme d’Etudes Spécialisées de Gynécologoie-Obstétrique. Université Cheikh Anta Diop.
[18]  Kazmi, T., Sarva Saiseema, V. and Khan, S. (2012) Analysis of Cesarean Section Rate—According to Robson’s 10-Group Classification. Oman Medical Journal, 27, 415-417.
https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2012.102
[19]  Pierre, F. and Rudigoz, R.-C. (2008) Césarienne en urgence: Existe-t-il un délai idéal? La Revue Sage-Femme, 7, 134-140.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sagf.2008.05.005
[20]  Essiben, F., Belinga, E., Noa Ndoua, C., Medjo Eman, M., Dohbit, J. and Foumane, P. (2020) La Césarienne en Milieu à Ressources Limitées: Évolution de la Fréquence, des Indications et du Pronostic à Dix Ans d’Intervalle. Health Sciences and Disease, 21, 25-31.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133