|
外语专业学术型研究生思辨能力培养个案研究——以组会互动合作对话为视角
|
Abstract:
本研究以社会文化理论为视角,以某高校外语学院学术型研究生组会为对象展开个案研究,以对话分析为主要方式,以访谈和反思日志为补充进行质性研究,探讨组会互动中合作对话对外语专业学术型研究生思辨能力的影响过程。研究发现:首先,该研究生小组组会对话特点是教师主导,学生主动参与,在对话过程中教师和学生能够使用多种策略自由反馈。其次,组会互动中师生及同伴合作对话对研究生思辨能力的培养有重要作用,促进学生对各种思辨技能的灵活运用,并在影响学生思辨认知和情感的基础上促进学生的学术研究发展。因此本研究认为,规律的组会活动有助于研究生思辨能力的培养,使研究生表现出更加深入的学术思考和探索能力及更加积极的学术态度。
This study takes a sociocultural perspective and focuses on group meetings interaction among a foreign language academic postgraduates group to conduct a case study, using collaborative dialogue analysis as the primary method, supplemented by interviews and reflective journals. The goal is to explore the impacts of collaborative dialogue on foreign language academic postgraduates’ thinking skills. The findings of the study are as follows: First, the characteristic of the group meeting dialogue is that it is teacher-led, but with active student participation. In the collaborative dialogue process, teachers and students can use various strategies to freely provide feedback. Second, collaborative dialogues among teacher-students and peers during group meetings play an important role in developing thinking skills, promoting flexible use of various cognitive skills, and fostering academic research development by influencing students’ cognitive and emotional aspects of critical thinking. Thus, this study holds that regular group meetings contribute to the cultivation of postgraduates’ critical thinking skills, leading to deeper academic reflection and inquiring abilities, as well as a more positive attitude.
[1] | Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M. and Wheatley, L. (2019) Teacher-Student Dialogue during Classroom Teaching: Does It Really Impact on Student Outcomes? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28, 462-512. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730 |
[2] | Lantolf, J.P. and Thorne, S.L. (2006) Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford University Press. |
[3] | Muhonen, H., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Pakarinen, E., Poikkeus, A. and Lerkkanen, M. (2016) Scaffolding through Dialogic Teaching in Early School Classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.007 |
[4] | Swain, M. (2000) The Output Hypothesis and Beyond: Mediating Acquisition through Collaborative Dialogue. In: Lantolf, J.P., Ed., Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, Oxford University Press, 97-114. |
[5] | Swain, M., Kinnear, P. and Steinman, L. (2011) Sociocultural Theory in Second Language Education: An Introduction through Narratives. Multilingual Matters, 32-44. |
[6] | 陈菁, 李丹丽. ZPD视角下基于思辨力培养的教师实时性支架构建[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2021, 44(4): 115-124. |
[7] | 杜小双, 张莲. 外语课堂互动中教师话语对学生思维发展的支架作用[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2022, 44(5): 101-118. |
[8] | 文秋芳, 王建卿, 赵彩然, 等. 构建我国外语类大学生思辨能力量具的理论框架[J]. 外语界, 2009(1): 37-43. |
[9] | 杨莉芳. 阅读课堂提问的认知特征与思辨能力培养[J]. 中国外语, 2015, 12(2): 68-79. |
[10] | 徐锦芬, 叶晟杉. 二语/外语课堂中的同伴互动探析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014(10): 31-36. |
[11] | Dobao, A.F. (2014) Vocabulary Learning in Collaborative Tasks: A Comparison of Pair and Small Group Work. Language Teaching Research, 18, 497-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813519730 |
[12] | Donato, R. (1994) Collective Scaffolding in Second Language Learning. In: Lantolf, J.P. and Vygotskian, G.A., Eds., Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, 33-56. |
[13] | Ohta, A.S. (1995) Applying Sociocultural Theory to an Analysis of Learner Discourse: Learner-Learner Collaborative Interaction in the Zone of Proximal Development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 93-121. https://doi.org/10.5070/l462005219 |
[14] | 秦丽莉. 二语习得社会文化理论概论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2017. |
[15] | Loewen, S. and Sato, M. (2018) Interaction and Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Language Teaching, 51, 285-329. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444818000125 |
[16] | Swain, M. and Watanabe, Y. (2013) Languaging: Collaborative Dialogue as a Source of Second Language Learning. In: The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Wiley Blackwell, 3218-3225. |
[17] | 孙有中. 外语教育与思辨能力培养[J]. 中国外语, 2015, 12(2): 1+23. |
[18] | Kumar, B.S., Brianna, H. and Sylvie, R. (2018) Peer Collaborative Writing in the EAP Classroom: Insights from a Canadian Post-Secondary Context. TESOL Journal, 10, e393. |
[19] | 杜小双, 张莲. 通过对话探究促进学生思维发展: 一项基于英语专业精读课堂的案例研究[J]. 外语教育研究前沿, 2023, 6(3): 56-63+95. |
[20] | 贾光茂, 方宗祥. 激活最近发展区: 大学英语课堂交际活动中教师及同伴支架作用研究[J]. 西安外国语大学学报, 2009, 17(3): 84-87+91. |
[21] | 郑琼鸽, 王晓芳. 什么影响了师门组会发言——基于人文社科博士研究生的质性研究[J]. 高教探索, 2021(3): 66-71. |
[22] | Krashen, S. (1985) The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Longman. |