全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Rhetoric of Natural Hair: Cultural Contradictions

DOI: 10.4236/aasoci.2024.149034, PP. 504-516

Keywords: Kinky, Natural, Black Hair, Marginalized, Women, Western Culture

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

To accomplish assimilation Black women have often altered their appearance— specifically their hair—to be accepted by the dominate culture even as this adaptation may run counter to their own cultural sensibilities. This cultural battle within the Black community has ostensibly created a sub-culture that not only struggles against Western culture, but the assimilated faction of their own group. This stance clashes with the widely accepted Western cultural standards of straight hair as a symbol of beauty because African Americans are expected to see themselves through a white gaze. Are Black women who choose to straighten their naturally kinky hair or lengthen it with weaves and extensions betraying their culture, as opposed to those women that embrace their hair in its natural state? Can one be included in, but not a part of a group’s culture? This cultural battle within the Black community, has compelled black women to redefine beauty on their own terms as it relates to the symbol of their natural hair as a cultural point of pride, ostensibly creating a sub-culture that not only struggles against Western culture, but the assimilated faction of their own group. Yet, even as Black women strive to claim a place in the hierarchy of their culture, they remain marginalized by the larger society.

References

[1]  Agence France-Presse (2016). Racism Row over South Africa School’s Alleged Hair Policy. The Guardian.
[2]  Ashe, B. D. (1995). “Why Don’t He Like My Hair?”: Constructing African-American Standards of Beauty in Toni Morrison’s Song of Solomon and Zora Neale Hurston’s Their Eyes Were Watching God. African American Review, 29, 579-592.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3042151
[3]  Brummett, B. (2015). Rhetoric in Popular Culture. Sage Publications。
[4]  Cauterucci, C. (2016). A Federal Court Ruled That Companies Can Fire People Just for Having Dreadlocks. Slate.
[5]  Erasmus, Z. (1997). ‘Oe! My Hare Gaan Huistoe’: Hair-Styling as Black Cultural Practice. Agenda, No. 32, 11-16.
https://doi.org/10.2307/4066147
[6]  Gabbara, P. (2019). Flaunting Freedom: The History of Louisianas 18th Century Tignon Laws. Bitchmedia.
[7]  Johnson, T. A., & Bankhead, T. (2014). Hair It Is: Examining the Experiences of Black Women with Natural Hair. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 86-100.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2014.21010
[8]  Jones, J. (2020). Black Hair Defined. Huffington Post.
[9]  Koppelman, C. (1996). The Politics of Hair. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 17, 87-88.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3346594
[10]  Okazawa-Rey, M., Robinson, T., & Ward, J. V. (1986). Black Women and the Politics of Skin Color and Hair. Women & Therapy, 6, 89-102.
https://doi.org/10.1300/j015v06n01_07
[11]  Patton, T. O. (2006). Hey Girl, Am I More than My Hair? African American Women and Their Struggles with Beauty, Body Image, and Hair. NWSA Journal, 18, 24-51.
https://doi.org/10.1353/nwsa.2006.0037
[12]  Thompson, V. L. S. (2001). The Complexity of African American Racial Identification. Journal of Black Studies, 32, 155-165.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002193470103200201
[13]  Wanjiru, A. (2017). It Is More than Just Hair: The Importance of the Natural Hair Movement. Face2Face Africa.
[14]  Weitz, R. (2001). Women and Their Hair: Seeking Power through Resistance and Accommodation. Gender & Society, 15, 667-686.
https://doi.org/10.1177/089124301015005003

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133