全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

代理决策中责任规避现象成因及对策
Causes and Interventions of Buck-Passing in Representative Decision-Making

DOI: 10.12677/ap.2024.149633, PP. 172-178

Keywords: 委托–代理,代理决策,责任规避
Principal-Agent
, Representative Decision-Making, Buck-Passing

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

生活中个体为他人或者群体做决策的情况时有发生,这一过程中,一旦出现负面的决策结果,往往会引发委托人的不满与后续的问责。为了逃避可能的指责,代理人往往表现出责任规避的倾向,这将给委托人及群体利益带来诸多不利影响。本文将从代理决策的角度探讨导致责任规避的因素,并提出相应的应对措施。文章首先明确了代理决策中责任规避的含义并总结了责任规避现象的表现形式,包括不确定性偏好、采取保守选项、转移决策权和找借口等;其次,本文从委托–代理关系视角、代理人视角与组织制度视角分析了责任规避现象背后的成因;最后,文章从这三个层面出发提出应对措施,以期对预防责任规避行为和强化担当有所启示。
Individuals often make decisions for others or groups in life. In the process, once there is a negative decision result, it will often lead to the dissatisfaction of the client and the subsequent accountability. In order to avoid potential blame, agents often show a tendency of buck-passing, which has many negative consequences for the interests of the principal and the group. This paper explores the factors that lead to buck-passing from the perspective of representative decision-making and proposes corresponding countermeasures. Firstly, the article defines buck-passing in representative decision-making and summarises the manifestations of the phenomenon of buck-passing, including uncertainty preference, adopting conservative options, transferring decision-making power and making excuses; Secondly, the article analyses the causes behind the phenomenon of buck-passing from the perspectives of the principal-agent relationship, the agent’s perspective and the organisational system; Lastly, the article proposes countermeasures from these three dimensions to shed light on the preventing buck-passing behaviour and the strengthening responsibility.

References

[1]  Laffont, J. J., & Martimort, D. (2002). 激励理论. 第一卷, 委托-代理模型(陈志俊, 李艳 译). 中国人民大学出版社.
[2]  曹丽君, 黄丽华, 蒋建萍, 章琪, 柳元化, 闵雪芬(2022). 医护患共同决策方案在房颤患者预防脑卒中中的应用. 中华护理杂志, 57(7), 779-784.
[3]  曹炜贞, 周小兰, 李晔(2023). 基于信息不对称理论的共同决策模式对股骨转子间骨折病人术后康复效果的影响. 循证护理, 9(23), 4309-4313.
[4]  陈化(2020). 临床代理决策中的利益冲突及其消解. 医学与哲学, 41(22), 21-25.
[5]  陈化, 徐喜荣(2013). 论临床代理决策中的“患者最佳利益原则”. 医学与哲学, 34(6), 5-8.
[6]  方付建(2014). 问责制下的责任规避现象研究. 广东行政学院学报, 26(5), 11-15.
[7]  高志华, 杨绍清, Juergen Margraf, XiaoChi Zhang, 路平(2016). 施瓦茨价值观问卷(PVQ-21)中文版在大学生中的修订. 中国健康心理学杂志, 24(11), 1684-1688.
[8]  谷志军(2013). 审计问责与国家治理. 理论与改革, (4), 129-133.
[9]  谷志军(2015). 委托代理矛盾、问责承诺与决策问责. 江海学刊, (1), 118-124, 239.
[10]  海燕(2023). 正念冥想能减少对负面信息的回避改善决策能力. 健与美, (9), 79.
[11]  贺培青(2011). 基于委托-代理理论的供应链质量契约决策研究. 江苏商论, (9), 43-45.
[12]  黎卓承(2023). 代理决策中的责任规避现象及人际信任的作用. 硕士学位论文, 金华: 浙江师范大学.
[13]  李良(2014). 道德困境中决策者的决策回避机理研究. 伦理学研究, (2), 11-17.
[14]  刘伟团(2007). 委托-代理下的不确定性决策研究. 硕士学位论文, 西安: 西安理工大学.
[15]  陆静怡, 尚雪松(2018). 为他人做决策: 多维度心理机制与决策体验. 心理科学进展, 26(9), 1545-1552.
[16]  彭丽芳(2021). 医疗情境下问责对代理决策者风险倾向的影响及其机制. 硕士学位论文, 长沙: 湖南师范大学.
[17]  彭媛, 唐斌(2024). 结构变迁与资源重置: 环境治理领域基层政府避责行为的生成机理与治理. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 48(3), 30-38.
[18]  彭宗超, 祝哲(2018). 危机决策者避责策略的四种模式及关键影响因素分析. 上海行政学院学报, 19(4), 93-101.
[19]  任玉冰, 杜秀芳(2018). 心理距离与后果严重性对人身安全决策的影响. 心理与行为研究, 16(3), 41-48.
[20]  石晖(2022). 农村老年人数字自我效能感提升的小组工作实务研究. 硕士学位论文, 南昌: 南昌大学.
[21]  田先红(2022). “数字避责”: 重大突发公共事件中基层官员避责行为研究——基于多案例的综合分析. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 58(1), 74-87.
[22]  田先红, 周展(2024). 风险治理市场化: 责任过载时的基层政府避责行为研究——基于J市Y镇保险政策实践过程的观察. 理论与改革, (3), 127-142, 160.
[23]  吴新博(2005). 信息不对称条件下委托-代理关系的主要问题. 北京师范大学学报: 社会科学版, (5), 112-116.
[24]  许珂, 张芳文(2024). 力微任重: 目标责任考核下的基层官员避责行为研究. 公共管理评论, 6(2), 363-387.
[25]  张力敏(2020). 投资决策中的委托代理矛盾——基于期权视角. 财会研究, (11), 32-36.
[26]  张玲, 杨雪娜(2024). 全过程育人视角下大学生责任担当教育的价值意蕴及实践路径. 未来与发展, (3), 34-42.
[27]  张涛(2001). 国有企业委托代理及治理结构改革. 亚太经济, (3), 76-78.
[28]  张维迎(1999). 博弈论与信息经济学. 上海人民出版社.
[29]  周玉华(2024). 激励机制在人力资源管理中的作用研究. 现代商业研究, (4), 137-139.
[30]  朱崇实(2017). 希望你们做敢于冒险的人. 教育家, (25), 43.
[31]  Batteux, E., Ferguson, E., & Tunney, R. J. (2019). Exploring How Accountability Affects the Medical Decisions We Make for Other People. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 79.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00079
[32]  Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad Is Stronger than Good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
[33]  Charness, G. (2000). Responsibility and Effort in an Experimental Labor Market. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 42, 375-384.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(00)00096-2
[34]  Costa, E., Pesci, C., Andreaus, M., & Taufer, E. (2018). Empathy, Closeness, and Distance in Non-Profit Accountability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32, 224-254.
https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-03-2014-1635
[35]  Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. M. (1999). The Effect of Time Pressure on Consumer Choice Deferral. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 369-384.
https://doi.org/10.1086/209545
[36]  Eriksen, K. W., & Kvaløy, O. (2010). Myopic Investment Management. Review of Finance, 14, 521-542.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfp019
[37]  Larrick, R. P. (1993). Motivational Factors in Decision Theories: The Role of Self-Protection. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 440-450.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.440
[38]  Leonhardt, J. M., Keller, L. R., & Pechmann, C. (2011). Avoiding the Risk of Responsibility by Seeking Uncertainty: Responsibility Aversion and Preference for Indirect Agency When Choosing for Others. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 405-413.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.01.001
[39]  Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as Feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267-286.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
[40]  Pollmann, M. M. H., Potters, J., & Trautmann, S. T. (2014). Risk Taking by Agents: The Role of Ex-Ante and Ex-Post Accountability. Economics Letters, 123, 387-390.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2014.04.004
[41]  Schoofs, L., Claeys, A., De Waele, A., & Cauberghe, V. (2019). The Role of Empathy in Crisis Communication: Providing a Deeper Understanding of How Organizational Crises and Crisis Communication Affect Reputation. Public Relations Review, 45, Article ID: 101851.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101851
[42]  Steffel, M., Williams, E. F., & Perrmann-Graham, J. (2016). Passing the Buck: Delegating Choices to Others to Avoid Responsibility and Blame. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 135, 32-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.04.006
[43]  Tykocinski, O. E., Pittman, T. S., & Tuttle, E. E. (1995). Inaction Inertia: Foregoing Future Benefits as a Result of an Initial Failure to Act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 793-803.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.793
[44]  van Harreveld, F., Rutjens, B. T., Rotteveel, M., Nordgren, L. F., & van der Pligt, J. (2009a). Ambivalence and Decisional Conflict as a Cause of Psychological Discomfort: Feeling Tense before Jumping off the Fence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 167-173.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.015
[45]  van Harreveld, F., van der Pligt, J., & de Liver, Y. N. (2009b). The Agony of Ambivalence and Ways to Resolve It: Introducing the MAID Model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 45-61.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308324518
[46]  Zeelenberg, M. (1999). Anticipated Regret, Expected Feedback and Behavioral Decision Making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 93-106.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(199906)12:2<93::aid-bdm311>3.0.co;2-s

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133