|
高度自动驾驶机动车交通事故侵权责任研究
|
Abstract:
在高度自动驾驶机动车道路交通事故侵权问题上,因驾驶人向乘客身份的角色转变,自动驾驶机动车兼具智能化技术属性与产品属性,现阶段应遵循“机动车交通事故责任 + 产品责任”的归责路径。自动驾驶系统的驾驶人的驾驶义务因自动驾驶技术的运用而有所变化,表现为自动驾驶系统开启前的检查维护义务和自动驾驶系统开启后的接管义务。违反此等义务导致交通事故损害的,其承担不作为侵权的过错推定责任。因自动驾驶系统和自动驾驶机动车制造、设计、警示和跟踪观察缺陷导致交通事故损害的,自动驾驶系统与自动驾驶机动车的生产者承担产品责任。但自动驾驶机动车以及自动驾驶系统属于特殊的人工智能产品,其产品缺陷的认定规则、因果关系举证规则以及免责事由均与传统产品责任规则不同。处理道路交通事故侵权问题,需要区分自动驾驶机动车的运行状态,进而认定驾驶人的义务,确定侵权责任形态。
In the highly automated driving motor vehicle road traffic accident infringement issues, due to the role of the driver to the identity of the passenger change, the automated driving motor vehicle both intelligent technology attributes and product attributes, at this stage we should follow the “motor vehicle traffic accident liability + product liability” path of attribution of responsibility. The driving obligation of the driver of the automatic driving system changes due to the use of automatic driving technology, which is manifested in the obligation to check and maintain the automatic driving system before it is turned on and the obligation to take over the automatic driving system after it is turned on. If the violation of these obligations leads to damage in a traffic accident, he or she is liable for the presumption of fault as a tort of omission. The producer of the automatic driving system and the automatic driving vehicle shall be liable for product liability if the damage is caused by defects in the manufacturing, design, warning and tracking observation of the automatic driving system and the automatic driving vehicle. However, automatic driving motor vehicle and automatic driving system belongs to special artificial intelligence products, its product defect identification rules, causality rules of evidence and exemptions are different from the traditional product liability rules. To deal with the infringement of road traffic accidents, it is necessary to differentiate the operating status of the self-driving motor vehicle, and then determine the obligations of the driver and the form of tort liability.
[1] | (2024) SAE Levels of Driving Automation. https://www.cnblogs.com/autodriver/p/18071560 |
[2] | 刘召成. 自动驾驶机动车致害的侵权责任构造[J]. 北方法学, 2020, 14(4): 5-17. |
[3] | 张力, 李倩. 高度自动驾驶汽车交通侵权责任构造分析[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2018(8): 35-43. |
[4] | 刘艳红. 自动驾驶的风险类型与法律规制[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2024, 32(1): 114-130. |
[5] | 刘召成. 部分权利能力制度的构建[J]. 法学研究, 2012, 34(5): 121-135. |
[6] | 郑志峰. 自动驾驶汽车的交通事故侵权责任[J]. 法学, 2018(4): 16-29. |
[7] | 司晓, 曹建峰. 论人工智能的民事责任: 以自动驾驶汽车和智能机器人为切入点[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2017, 35(5): 166-173. |
[8] | 尤婷, 刘健. 自动驾驶汽车的交通事故侵权责任研究[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 45(2): 32-36. |
[9] | 高圣平. 论产品责任的责任主体及归责事由——以《侵权责任法》“产品责任”章的解释论为视角[J]. 政治与法律, 2010(5): 2-9. |
[10] | 王利明. 侵权责任法研究(下册) [M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2011: 250. |
[11] | 丁利明. 关于将商业软件列入产品责任客体范围的法律思考[J]. 大连民族学院学报, 2010, 12(4): 361-363. |
[12] | 郑志峰. 自动驾驶汽车产品缺陷的认定困境与因应[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2022(12): 48-58. |
[13] | 王乐兵. 自动驾驶汽车的缺陷及其产品责任[J]. 清华法学, 2020, 14(2): 93-112. |
[14] | 杨立新. 医疗损害责任构成要件的具体判断[J]. 法律适用, 2012(4): 19-27. |
[15] | 于宪会. 论自动驾驶汽车保有人的无过错责任[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2023, 25(1): 121-134. |