With the beginning of the information systems’ spreading, people started thinking about using them for making business decisions. Computer technology solutions, such as the Decision Support System, make the decision-making process less complex and simpler for problem-solving. In order to make a high-quality business decision, managers need to have a great deal of appropriate information. Nonetheless, this complicates the process of making appropriate decisions. In a situation like that, the possibility of using DSS is quite logical. The aim of this paper is to find out the intended use of DSS for medium and large business organizations in USA by applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Different models were developed in order to understand and predict the use of information systems, but the information systems community mostly used TAM to ensure this issue. The purpose of the research model is to determine the elements of analysis that contribute to these results. The sample for the research consisted of the target group that was supposed to have completed an online questionnaire about the manager’s use of DSS in medium and large American companies. The information obtained from the questionnaires was analyzed through the SPSS statistical software. The research has indicated that, this is primarily used due to a significant level of Perceived usefulness and For the Perceived ease of use.
References
[1]
Arnott, D. and Pervan, G. (2008) Eight Key Issues for the Decision Support Systems Discipline. Decision Support Systems, 44, 657-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.09.003
[2]
Mackrell, D., Kerr, D. and von Hellens, L. (2009) A Qualitative Case Study of the Adoption and Use of an Agricultural Decision Support System in the Australian Cotton Industry: The Socio-Technical View. Decision Support Systems, 47, 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.02.004
[3]
Al-Rahmi, A.M., et al. (2019) Evaluating the Intended Use of Decision Support System (DSS) via Academic Staff: An Applying Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8, 565-571.
[4]
Khan, M., Sobuz, M. and Kabbo, M. (2023) Hardened and Microstructural Characteristics of a Biochar-Cement Mortar Composite. Proceedings of International Conference on Planning, Architecture and Civil Engineering, 12-14 October 2023, Rajshahi.
[5]
Hasan, R., Al Mahmud, M.A., Farabi, S.F., Akter, J. and Johora, F.T. (2024) Unsheltered: Navigating California’s Homelessness Crisis. Sociology Study, 14, 143-156. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5526/2024.03.002
[6]
Hasan, R., Chy, M.A.R., Johora, F.T., Ullah, M.W. and Saju, M.A.B. (2024) Driving Growth: The Integral Role of Small Businesses in the U.S. Economic Landscape. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 14, 852-868. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2024.146043
[7]
Hasan, R., Farabi, S.F., Kamruzzaman, M., Bhuyan, M.K., Nilima, S.I. and Shahana, A. (2024) AI-Driven Strategies for Reducing Deforestation. The American Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6, 6-20. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/volume06issue06-02
[8]
Johora, F.T., Hasan, R., Farabi, S.F., Akter, J. and Mahmud, M.A.A. (2024) AI-Powered Fraud Detection in Banking: Safeguarding Financial Transactions. The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations, 6, 8-22. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmei/volume06issue06-02
[9]
Al Mahmud, M.A., Hossain, M.A., et al. (2024) Information Technology for the Next Future World: Adoption of It for Social and Economic Growth: Part II. International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology, 10, 742-747.
[10]
Mohammad, N., Imran, M.A.U., Prabha, M., Sharmin, S. and Khatoon, R. (2024) Combating Banking Fraud with It: Integrating Machine Learning and Data Analytics. The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations, 6, 39-56. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmei/volume06issue07-04
[11]
Hasan, R., Farabi, S.F., Al Mahmud, M.A., et al. (2024) Information Technologies for the Next Future World: Implications, Impacts and Barriers: Part I. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 12, a323-a330.
[12]
Shahana, A., Hasan, R., Farabi, S.F., Akter, J., Mahmud, M.A.A., Johora, F.T., et al. (2024) AI-Driven Cybersecurity: Balancing Advancements and Safeguards. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 6, 76-85. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2024.6.2.9
[13]
Zaman, A.A.U., Abdelaty, A. and Sobuz, M.H.R. (2024) Integration of BIM Data and Real-Time Game Engine Applications: Case Studies in Construction Safety Management. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 29, 117-140. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2024.007
[14]
Habibur Rahman Sobuz, M., Khan, M.H., Kawsarul Islam Kabbo, M., Alhamami, A.H., Aditto, F.S., Saziduzzaman Sajib, M., et al. (2024) Assessment of Mechanical Properties with Machine Learning Modeling and Durability, and Microstructural Characteristics of a Biochar-Cement Mortar Composite. Construction and Building Materials, 411, Article 134281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134281
[15]
Jabin, J.A., Khondoker, M.T.H., Sobuz, M.H.R. and Aditto, F.S. (2024) High-Temperature Effect on the Mechanical Behavior of Recycled Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Containing Volcanic Pumice Powder: An Experimental Assessment Combined with Machine Learning (Ml)-Based Prediction. Construction and Building Materials, 418, Article 135362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135362
[16]
Sobuz, M.H.R., Al-Imran,, Datta, S.D., Jabin, J.A., Aditto, F.S., Sadiqul Hasan, N.M., et al. (2024) Assessing the Influence of Sugarcane Bagasse Ash for the Production of Eco-Friendly Concrete: Experimental and Machine Learning Approaches. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 20, e02839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02839
[17]
Saha, S., Ghimire, A., Manik, M.M.T.G., Tiwari, A. and Imran, M.A.U. (2024) Exploring Benefits, Overcoming Challenges, and Shaping Future Trends of Artificial Intelligence Application in Agricultural Industry. The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering, 6, 11-27. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajabe/volume06issue07-03
[18]
Power, D.J. (2002) Decision Support Systems: Concepts and Resources for Managers. Quorum Books Westport.
[19]
Davis, F.D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
[20]
Meraz, M.M., Mim, N.J., Mehedi, M.T., Bhattacharya, B., Aftab, M.R., Billah, M.M., et al. (2023) Self-Healing Concrete: Fabrication, Advancement, and Effectiveness for Long-Term Integrity of Concrete Infrastructures. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 73, 665-694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.05.008
[21]
Akid, A.S.M., Wasiew, Q.A., Sobuz, M.H.R., Rahman, T. and Tam, V.W. (2020) Flexural Behavior of Corroded Reinforced Concrete Beam Strengthened with Jute Fiber Reinforced Polymer. Advances in Structural Engineering, 24, 1269-1282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433220974783
[22]
Aditto, F.S., Sobuz, M.H.R., Saha, A., Jabin, J.A., Kabbo, M.K.I., Hasan, N.M.S., et al. (2023) Fresh, Mechanical and Microstructural Behaviour of High-Strength Self-Compacting Concrete Using Supplementary Cementitious Materials. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 19, e02395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02395
[23]
Kabbo, M., Sobuz, M. and Khan, M. (2023) Combined Influence of Waste Marble Powder and Silica Fume on the Mechanical Properties of Structural Cellular Lightweight Concrete.
[24]
Habibur Rahman Sobuz, M., Khan, M.H., Kawsarul Islam Kabbo, M., Alhamami, A.H., Aditto, F.S., Saziduzzaman Sajib, M., et al. (2024) Assessment of Mechanical Properties with Machine Learning Modeling and Durability, and Microstructural Characteristics of a Biochar-Cement Mortar Composite. Construction and Building Materials, 411, Article 134281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134281
[25]
Dulcic, Z., Pavlic, D. and Silic, I. (2012) Evaluating the Intended Use of Decision Support System (DSS) by Applying Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Business Organizations in Croatia. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1565-1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1143
[26]
Money, W. and Turner, A. (2004). Application of the Technology Acceptance Model to a Knowledge Management System. 37thAnnual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, 5-8 January 2004, 9. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2004.1265573
[27]
Arnott, D. and Pervan, G. (2005) A Critical Analysis of Decision Support Systems Research. Journal of Information Technology, 20, 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000035
[28]
Turban, E. (2011) Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems. Pearson Education India.
[29]
Mir, S.A. and Quadri, S.M.K. (2009) Decision Support Systems: Concepts, Progress and Issues—A Review. In: Lichtfouse, E., Ed., Climate Change, Intercropping, Pest Control and Beneficial Microorganisms, Springer Netherlands, 373-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2716-0_13
[30]
Shim, J.P., Warkentin, M., Courtney, J.F., Power, D.J., Sharda, R. and Carlsson, C. (2002) Past, Present, and Future of Decision Support Technology. Decision Support Systems, 33, 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-9236(01)00139-7
[31]
Rai, A., Lang, S.S. and Welker, R.B. (2002) Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis. Information Systems Research, 13, 50-69. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96
[32]
Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1999) Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies? Decision Sciences, 30, 361-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x
[33]
Gefen, D. and Straub, D. (2000) The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00008
[34]
Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. (2008) Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39, 273-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
[35]
Mathieson, K. (1991) Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research, 2, 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.173
[36]
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003) User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
[37]
DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (2003) The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 9-30.
