全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

掺粘土砖再生骨料钢筋混凝土柱的小偏心受压性能分析
Analysis of Small Eccentric Compression Performance of Recycled Aggregate Reinforced Concrete Column Mixed with Clay Brick

DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2024.138163, PP. 1513-1519

Keywords: 砖骨料再生混凝土,35%取代率,小偏心受压,受力分析
Brick Aggregate Recycled Concrete
, 35% Substitution Rate, Small Eccentric Pressure, Force Analysis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

通过混凝土柱的小偏心受压性能试验,对三根不同偏心距砖骨料再生混凝土柱和一根相同原材料且同强度的普通骨料混凝土柱进行研究。砖骨料再生混凝土强度按照C30、砖骨料替代率为35% (砖骨料质量占所有粗骨料的质量比例)进行配合比设计,水灰比、骨料用量、用水量与普通混凝土构件不同。分析砖骨料再生混凝土柱和同强度普通骨料混凝土柱在受力过程、破坏特征、变形能力与承载力等方面的差异。试验结果发现:砖骨料再生混凝土柱从加载到破坏的过程中具有和普通混凝土柱相似的受力阶段和破坏形态。相同的偏心距与同强度的普通骨料混凝土柱相比,略有降低,但承载力变化不大,可能因为砖骨料表面有较多缺陷和微裂缝且二次利用,导致强度难以满足要求。
Three brick aggregate recycled concrete columns with different eccentric distances and one ordinary aggregate concrete column with the same raw material and the same strength were studied through the small eccentric compression performance test of the concrete column. The strength of the recycled concrete of brick aggregate is designed according to C30 and the replacement rate of brick aggregate is 35% (the quality of brick aggregate accounts for the quality ratio of all coarse aggregate). The water-cement ratio, aggregate consumption and water consumption are different from ordinary concrete components. The study analyzed the differences between brick aggregate recycled concrete columns and ordinary aggregate concrete columns of the same strength in terms of stress process, failure characteristics, deformation capacity and bearing capacity. The test results show that the recycled concrete column of brick aggregate has a similar stress stage and failure form to the ordinary concrete column. Compared with the ordinary aggregate concrete column of the same strength, the same eccentric distance is slightly reduced, but the bearing capacity does not change much. It may be because the brick aggregate surface has many defects and microcracks and secondary utilization, making it difficult to meet strength requirements.

References

[1]  彭颖, 朱南海. 砖混建筑垃圾的再生利用及其力学性能试验[J]. 赤峰学院学报(自然科学版), 2021, 37(9): 32-37.
[2]  徐开东, 王继娜, 李志新, 等. 砖混建筑垃圾再生骨料应用技术指标系统化研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2020, 39(9): 2905-2911.
[3]  朱增梅. 再生砖骨料混凝土国内外研究现状综述[J]. 砖瓦, 2019(7): 44-47.
[4]  佟英男. 再生砖混骨料的研究现状与应用探讨[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2023, 13(27): 152-154, 159.
[5]  王纯合, 翟爱良, 季昌良, 等. 再生砖骨料混凝土梁斜截面抗剪性能试验研究[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2013(4): 40-44.
[6]  赵骏. 粘土砖再生粗骨料混凝土梁的抗剪性能试验研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学, 2017.
[7]  郭子龙. 砖骨料再生混凝土短肢剪力墙抗震试验研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学, 2015.
[8]  程远兵, 乔光华. 粘土砖再生粗骨料混凝土梁弯曲性能的试验研究[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 37(3): 41-44, 64.
[9]  孙一李全, 赵羽习, 孟涛, 等. 再生砖混骨料混凝土柱的小偏心受压性能[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(6): 1090-1099.
[10]  鲁敏, 熊祖鸿, 林霞, 等. 建筑垃圾再生砖的早期强度性能研究[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(8): 173-176.
[11]  陈宗平, 占东辉, 徐金俊. 再生粗骨料含量对再生混凝土力学性能的影响分析[J]. 工业建筑, 2015, 45(1): 130-135.
[12]  陈萌, 毕苏萍. 废弃碎砖骨料再生混凝土配合比设计与早期强度试验[J]. 混凝土与水泥制品, 2014(4): 87-89.
[13]  中国建筑科学研究院. JGJ55-2011 普通混凝土配合比设计规程[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2011.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133