|
恶意抢注商标强制移转制度的适用研究
|
Abstract:
为进一步规制商标恶意抢注行为,《商标法》第五次修订草案新增商标的强制移转制度,完善了在先权利人对被恶意抢注商标维权的救济路径并减少其后续的注册成本,是完善我国商标制度、加大对恶意注册行为打击力度的重要制度安排。但该制度的规范设计仍较为简单,其具体规定有待进一步细化,在条文安排上,商标强制转移制度应独立于无效宣告制度,并且设置相应的除斥期间,且将近似商标的保护也涵盖到该制度之中,同时也应协调好与其他制度如善意第三人制度的衔接问题。
In order to further regulate the malicious trademark registration behavior, the fifth draft amendment of the Trademark Law added the compulsory transfer system of trademarks, which improves the relief path of the prior right holder to defend the maliciously registered trademarks and reduces the subsequent registration cost, which is an important institutional arrangement to improve China’s trademark system and increase the strength of the fight against the malicious registration behavior. However, the normative design of the system is still relatively simple, its specific provisions need to be further refined, in the provisions of the arrangement, the compulsory transfer of trademark system should be independent of the invalidation system, and set up the corresponding exclusion period, and will be similar to the protection of trademarks are also covered by the system, and should be coordinated with other systems such as bona fide third-party system of the convergence of the problem.
[1] | 吴汉东. 恶意商标注册的概念体系解读与规范适用分析[J]. 现代法学, 2023, 45(1): 17-33. |
[2] | 张浩然. 论抢注商标强制转让制度的构建[J].中华商标, 2022(9): 54-59. |
[3] | 魏丽丽. 规制商标恶意抢注的立法检视与完善[J]. 河南大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 59(3): 64-69. |
[4] | 彭学龙、刘泳. 恶意注册商标强制移转制度研究——评《商标法修订草案(征求意见稿)》相关条款[J]. 知识产权, 2023(9): 25-42. |
[5] | 孙那, 鲍一鸣. 恶意抢注商标与在先权利冲突的司法解决路径研究[J]. 电子知识产权, 2023(7): 4-14. |