|
英雄岭页岩油藏水力压裂效果评价方法及应用
|
Abstract:
页岩油藏多段多簇水平井压裂缝网结构的复杂化使得准确评价压裂效果难度大。针对压裂施工过程中数据来源和解释原理差异性大,评价方法间各有优劣且可互相补充,需要综合考虑地质条件、压裂参数和评价目标等因素,提出联合多种评价方法进行综合评估。以英雄岭英页2平台H14-2井为例,采用压裂停泵高频压力测试、示踪剂测试、井中微地震测试等联合评价方法对压裂缝规模、压裂缝渗流特征、压裂缝产能进行压裂效果评价;联合录测井对岩性岩相的解释成果,深层揭示油相示踪剂反映的压裂水平井段供液存在差异化动用的特征。综合评估表明,停泵压降法反演得到的裂缝规模可以通过微地震验证并补充,示踪剂返排浓度曲线结合微地震的三种缝网模型可以评价压裂水平井产能水平,压裂段动用状况先启动的岩性主要为纹层状灰云岩,后启动的岩性主要为层状灰云岩。采用联合评价方法可以满足页岩油井压裂改造效果评价的挑战,并为页岩油藏的高效开发提供科学依据。
In shale reservoirs, due to the complexity of the fracture network structure of multi-section and multi-cluster horizontal wells, it is difficult to accurately evaluate the fracturing effect. In response to the problem of the great variability of data sources and interpretation principles in the process of fracturing construction, each evaluation method has its own advantages and disadvantages and can be complementary to each other. It is necessary to consider factors such as geological conditions, fracturing parameters and evaluation objectives, and to propose a comprehensive evaluation by combining multiple evaluation methods. Taking YY2H14-2 well as an example, joint evaluation methods such as high-frequency pressure test of fracturing stop pump, tracer test and microseismic test in the well were adopted to evaluate the fracturing effect on the fracture scale, seepage characteristics of the fracture and fracture production capacity. Combined with the results of logging interpretation of lithology and lithofacies, it deeply reveals the characteristics of differential utilization of liquid supply in fractured horizontal well section reflected by oil phase tracer. The comprehensive evaluation shows that the fracture scale obtained from the inversion of the stop-pump pressure drop method can be verified and supplemented by microseismic, the tracer flowback concentration curve combined with the three types of fracture network models from microseismic can evaluate the productivity level of the fractured horizontal wells. The lithology of the first start-up of the fracturing section is mainly lamellar limestone, and the lithology of the second start-up is mainly lamellar limestone. The joint evaluation method can meet the challenge of evaluating the fracturing effect of shale oil wells and provide a scientific basis for the efficient development of shale reservoirs.
[1] | 赵文智, 朱如凯, 刘伟, 等. 中国陆相页岩油勘探理论与技术进展[J]. 石油科学通报, 2023, 8(4): 373-390. |
[2] | 刘合, 孟思炜, 王素玲, 等. 古龙页岩力学特征与裂缝扩展机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 820-828. |
[3] | 刘成林, 刘新菊, 张洪军, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地安塞地区页岩油地质-工程一体化技术实践[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(5): 1238-1248. |
[4] | 焦方正. 鄂尔多斯盆地页岩油缝网波及研究及其在体积开发中的应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1181-1188. |
[5] | 谢贵琪, 林海, 刘世铎, 等. 柴达木盆地西部英雄岭页岩油地质工程一体化压裂技术创新与实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2023, 28(4): 105-116. |
[6] | 陈斌, 蔺敬旗, 李兆春, 等. 阵列声波测井在页岩油体积压裂效果评价中的应用[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, 28(4): 550-554. |
[7] | 温杰雄, 田伟, 毕全福, 等. 基于数字滤波的压裂停泵数据反演方法[J]. 中国科学技术大学学报, 2018, 48(5): 392-399. |
[8] | 吴嘉伟, 张长好, 司丹, 等. 柴达木盆地狮子沟构造下干柴沟组上段有效裂缝与地应力关系及其意义[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(7): 2557-2571. |
[9] | 李亭, 张金发, 管英柱, 等. 水平井分段压裂各段产能评价技术研究进展[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2023, 23(21): 8916-8927. |
[10] | 邵晓光, 董宏丽, 代丽艳. 微地震监测技术综述[J]. 吉林大学学报(信息科学版), 2018, 36(1): 55-61. |
[11] | 王晓强, 赵立安, 王志愿, 等. 基于水锤效应与倒谱变换的停泵压力分析方法[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 108-116. |
[12] | 蒋国斌, 才庆, 杨景海, 等. 基于大规模多段压裂水平井返排数据的压裂效果评价方法[J]. 油气井测试, 2019, 28(2): 14-19. |
[13] | 缪思钰, 张海江, 陈余宽, 等. 基于微地震定位和速度成像的页岩气水力压裂地面微地震监测[J]. 石油物探, 2019, 58(2): 262-271, 284. |
[14] | 邢岳堃, 黄炳香, 陈大勇, 等. 压裂裂缝非线性断裂的声发射全波形多参量监测[J]. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46(11): 3470-3487. |
[15] | 李宁, 刘鹏, 范华军, 等. 基于阵列声波测井的井下多尺度压裂效果评价方法[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2024, 52(1): 1-7. |
[16] | 周珺, 邓睿, 韩旭, 等. 基于停泵压降分析的致密砂岩压裂效果评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2017, 24(2): 165-169. |
[17] | 李鹏, 宋慧娟, 李硕, 陈坤. 基于微地震监测技术分析影响压裂效果的因素——以复兴地区为例[C]//中国石油学会石油物探专业委员会. 第二届中国石油物探学术年会论文集(下册). 2024: 4. |
[18] | 邓大伟. 水平井压后示踪剂监测技术应用研究[J]. 中外能源, 2021, 26(4): 48-51. |
[19] | 刘文超, 乔成成, 汪萍, 等. 页岩气井压裂液返排与生产阶段的压裂裂缝特征差异研究[J]. 力学学报, 2023, 55(6): 1382-1393. |
[20] | 梁成钢, 唐伏平, 谢建勇, 等. 致密油藏水平井压裂后油压特征及压裂效果分析——以昌吉油田3口水平井为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(1): 63-66. |
[21] | 孟令韬, 鲍文辉, 郭布民, 等. 示踪剂技术在压裂效果评价中的研究进展[J]. 石油化工应用, 2022, 41(3): 1-4, 23. |