Aim: This paper aims to evaluate disparities of type 2 diabetes structured health education programmes that is utilised within the communities.Design: systematic review, (a type of secondary research design) aiming to summarize the results of prior primary research studies on available evidence Community type 2 diabetes structured education (CT2DSHE). Methods: Research question: Type 2 diabetic structured health education within a community how effective is it? Qualitative Systematic review, defined as a way to get reliable and objective picture of current available evidence on the specific topic—(CT2DSHE), (Denscombe, 2021) through reflexivity synthesis of available data as an example. This is valuable in time constraints such as project assignments that must be met within specific time and also to bring together available evidence together [1]. Results: This review has shown that CT2DSHE is effective with seven out of the eleven authors supporting, three authors against and one was neutral, further showed that knowledge and skills acquired can last longer with patient activation improved among T2DM patients ideal for sustaining their self-management of T2DM. Conclusion: This research provides suggestive answers to the research question: “Type 2 diabetic structured health education within a community how effective is it?”, This has demonstrated CT2DSHE effectiveness in knowledge acquisition and improving T2DM awareness among T2DM patients, whilst evidencing long effects beyond the study times of 3 - 9 months period in relation to patient activation. Also Identified diabetes education self-management on newly diagnosed (DESMOND) patient as CT2DSHE program for recommendation.Patient or Public Contribution: This work aspires to contribute to CT2DSHE in these areas; Influencing policy decision-making for community diabetes care within the UK and world at large., Contributing to already vast knowledge on diabetes self-management and reasons why?, Influencing educators on how CT2DSHEP are designed, delivered by putting the patient at the Centre and bringing different perspectives on CT2DSHEP in one place that is serving users time of having to consult several resources especially busy clinicians [2][3].
References
[1]
Jesson, J., Matheson, L. and Lacey, F.M. (2011) Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. Sage. https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Doing_Your_Literature_Review/LUhdBAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=what+are+the+possible+reason+to+use+systematic+review+in+a+research+project&pg=PP1&printsec=frontcover
[2]
Denscombe, M. (2021) Good Research Guide: Research Methods for Small-Scale Social Research. 7th Edition, Open Univ. Press.
[3]
MacKenzie, H., Dewey, A., Drahota, A., Kilburn, S., Kalra, P.R., Fogg, C. and Zachariah, D. (2012) Basic Research for Clinicians: Systematic Reviews: What They Are, Why They Are Important, and How to Get Involved. Journal of Clinical and Preventive Cardiology, 1, 193-202. https://pure.port.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/4704726/Systematic_reviews_what_they_are.pdf
[4]
Deverts, D.J., Heisler, M., Kieffer, E.C., Piatt, G.A., Valbuena, F., Yabes, J.G., et al. (2022) Comparing the Effectiveness of Family Support for Health Action (FAM-ACT) with Traditional Community Health Worker-Led Interventions to Improve Adult Diabetes Management and Outcomes: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Trials, 23, Article No. 841. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06764-1
[5]
Werfalli, M., Raubenheimer, P.J., Engel, M., Musekiwa, A., Bobrow, K., Peer, N., et al. (2020) The Effectiveness of Peer and Community Health Worker-Led Self-Management Support Programs for Improving Diabetes Health-Related Outcomes in Adults in Low-and-Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Systematic Reviews, 9, Article No. 133. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01377-8
[6]
Lin, X., Xu, Y., Pan, X., Xu, J., Ding, Y., Sun, X., et al. (2020) Global, Regional, and National Burden and Trend of Diabetes in 195 Countries and Territories: An Analysis from 1990 to 2025. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 14790. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71908-9
[7]
Lowry, A.M. and Grant, R.M. (2017) Introduction of the DESMOND Programme for Type Two Diabetes to Wellsouth Primary Health Network. International Journal of Integrated Care, 17, A30. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.3142
[8]
Turner, J., Martin, G., Hudson, N., Shaw, L., Huddlestone, L., Weis, C., et al. (2022) Using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) to Develop an Intervention to Improve Referral and Uptake Rates for Self-Management Education for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in UK Primary Care. BMC Health Services Research, 22, Article No. 1206. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08553-7
[9]
Taggart, L., Truesdale, M., Carey, M.E., Martin-Stacey, L., Scott, J., Bunting, B., et al. (2017) Pilot Feasibility Study Examining a Structured Self-Management Diabetes Education Programme, DESMOND-ID, Targeting HbA1c in Adults with Intellectual Disabilities. Diabetic Medicine, 35, 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13539
[10]
Dahal, P.K. and Hosseinzadeh, H. (2019) Association of Health Literacy and Diabetes Self-Management: A Systematic Review. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 25, 526-533. https://doi.org/10.1071/py19007
[11]
Ye, W., Kuo, S., Kieffer, E.C., Piatt, G., Sinco, B., Palmisano, G., et al. (2020) Cost-Effectiveness of a Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Intervention Led by Community Health Workers and Peer Leaders: Projections from the Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health Detroit Trial. Diabetes Care, 44, 1108-1115. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-0307
[12]
Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
[13]
Eades, C. and Alexander, H. (2019) A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Non-Attendance at Diabetes Appointments Using Peer Researchers. Health Expectations, 22, 1260-1271. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12959
[14]
Singh, H., Soyoltulga, K., Fong, T. and Billimek, J. (2018) Delivery Outcomes, Emergency Room Visits, and Psychological Aspects of Gestational Diabetes: Results from a Community Hospital Multiethnic Cohort. The Diabetes Educator, 44, 465-474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721718795589
[15]
Jeem, Y.A., Andriani, R.N., Nabila, R., Emelia, D.D., Lazuardi, L. and Koesnanto, H. (2022) The Use of Mobile Health Interventions for Outcomes among Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Prediabetes: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, Article No. 13638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013638
[16]
Liu, K., Xie, Z. and Or, C.K. (2019) Effectiveness of Mobile App-Assisted Self-Care Interventions in Improving Patient Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and/or Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8, e15779.
[17]
Pienaar, M. and Reid, M. (2020) Self-Management in Face-to-Face Peer Support for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Living in Low-or Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. BMC Public Health, 20, Article No. 1834. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09954-1
[18]
Price, A., de Bell, S., Shaw, N., Bethel, A., Anderson, R. and Coon, J.T. (2022) What Is the Volume, Diversity and Nature of Recent, Robust Evidence for the Use of Peer Support in Health and Social Care? An Evidence and Gap Map. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18, e1264. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1264
[19]
do Rosário Pinto, M., Parreira, P.M.D.S., Basto, M.L. and dos Santos Mendes Mónico, L. (2017) Impact of a Structured Multicomponent Educational Intervention Program on Metabolic Control of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. BMC Endocrine Disorders, 17, Article No. 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-017-0222-2
[20]
Miller, V.M., Davies, M.J., Etherton-Beer, C., McGough, S., Schofield, D., Jensen, J.F., et al. (2020) Increasing Patient Activation through Diabetes Self-Management Education: Outcomes of DESMOND in Regional Western Australia. Patient Education and Counseling, 103, 848-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.10.013
[21]
Moses, M. and Olenik, N.L. (2019) Perceived Impact of Caregiver’s Participation in Diabetes Education Classes on Implementation of Self-Care Behaviors. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 59, S47-S51.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2019.05.014
[22]
Okube, O.T., Kimani, S. and Mirie, W. (2022) Community-Based Lifestyle Intervention Improves Metabolic Syndrome and Related Markers among Kenyan Adults. Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, 21, 607-621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-022-01023-1
[23]
Diabetes UK (2015) Diabetes Self-Management Education. Diabetes UK. https://www.diabetes.org.uk/professionals/resources/resources-to-improve-your-clinical-practice/diabetes-self-management-education
[24]
Ross, J., Stevenson, F., Dack, C., Pal, K., May, C., Michie, S., et al. (2018) Developing an Implementation Strategy for a Digital Health Intervention: An Example in Routine Healthcare. BMC Health Services Research, 18, Article No. 794. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3615-7
[25]
McCay, D., Hill, A., Coates, V., O’Kane, M. and McGuigan, K. (2019) Structured Diabetes Education Outcomes: Looking beyond HbA1c. A Systematic Review. Practical Diabetes, 36, 86-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/pdi.2221
[26]
Stotz, S.A., Moore, K.R., McNulty, M., Begay, K., Scarton, L., Jiang, L., et al. (2023) Evaluation of a Synchronous, Online Diabetes Nutrition Education Program for American Indians and Alaska Natives with Type 2 Diabetes: Facilitators and Participants’ Experiences. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 55, 114-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2022.10.013
[27]
Tricco, A.C., Cardoso, R., Thomas, S.M., Motiwala, S., Sullivan, S., Kealey, M.R., et al. (2015) Barriers and Facilitators to Uptake of Systematic Reviews by Policy Makers and Health Care Managers: A Scoping Review. Implementation Science, 11, Article No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0370-1
