|
Dispute Settlement 2024
《民法典》视域下夫妻一方侵权之债的清偿规则研究
|
Abstract:
《中华人民共和国民法典》(以下简称《民法典》)及其司法解释对夫妻一方侵权之债属于共同债务还是个人债务尚未作出明确规定,这导致司法实践中对同一侵权之债的性质难以认定,同案不同判的现象在各地法院都频繁出现。否定说、肯定说、区分说等理论也存在分歧,为平衡债权人与债务人及其配偶的利益冲突,将夫妻一方侵权之债定性为夫妻共同债务,再确立无辜配偶权益的保护制度。债务共担体现了夫妻利益共同体的实际,强化了对弱者的保护。在夫妻债务共担会显失公平的情况下,对责任财产进行限定,确定夫妻共同财产与侵权人个人财产的清偿顺序和无辜配偶的内部追偿权,保护非侵权方的配偶权益。
The Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Civil Code) and its judicial interpretation have not made clear whether the tort debt of one of the spouses belongs to a joint debt or an individual debt, which leads to the difficulty in judicial practice to identify the nature of the same tort debt, and the phenomenon of different judgments in the same case frequently appears in local courts. Negative, affirmative and differentiated theories also diverge, and in order to balance the conflict of interest between creditors, debtors and their spouses, the tort debt of one of the spouses is characterized as the joint debt of the husband and wife, and then the protection system of the rights and interests of innocent spouses is established. Debt sharing reflects the reality of the husband and wife interest community and strengthens the protection of the weak. In the case that the sharing of marital debt is obviously unfair, the liability property is limited, the settlement order of the joint property of the husband and wife and the personal property of the infringer are determined, and the innocent spouse’s internal rights of recovery are protected, so as to protect the spouse rights of the non-infringing party.
[1] | 刘文勇. 《民法典∙婚姻家庭编》夫妻共同债务的认定——兼论夫妻共同债务证明责任的分配[J]. 妇女研究论丛, 2021(3): 103-113. |
[2] | 黄薇. 中华人民共和国民法典婚姻家庭编释义[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2020: 178-179. |
[3] | 冉克平. 论夫妻债务的清偿与执行规则[J]. 法学杂志, 2021, 42(8): 37-51. |
[4] | 冉克平. 夫妻财产制度的双重结构及其体系化释论[J]. 中国法学, 2020(6): 64-83. |
[5] | 斐桦. 夫妻共同财产制研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2009: 209. |
[6] | 陈苇. 婚姻家庭继承法学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2018: 194. |
[7] | 蔡立东. 侵权纠纷中夫妻共同债务认定的困境与立法回应: 以机动车交通事故责任纠纷为研究对象[J]. 法学论坛, 2020, 35(3): 77-88. |
[8] | 嫪宇. 走出夫妻共同债务的误区: 以《婚姻法司法解释(二)》第24条为分析对象[J]. 中外法学, 2018, 30(1): 253-276. |
[9] | 法国民法典[M]. 罗结珍, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2010: 365. |
[10] | 德国民法典[M]. 陈卫佐, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2015: 459. |
[11] | 吴晓芳. 婚姻法司法解释(三)适用中的疑难问题探析[J]. 法律适用, 2014(1): 76. |
[12] | 郑炜. 论清偿夫妻一方所负侵权之债的财产范围-兼论非侵权配偶方的利益保护[J]. 中南财经政法大学研究生学报, 2019(1): 124-130. |
[13] | 蔡超杰. 民法典视域下夫妻一方侵权之债的清偿规则研究[J]. 丽水学院学报, 2023, 45(4): 25-31. |
[14] | 秦慧敏. 论国际私法中的弱者利益保护原则——以涉外婚姻家庭关系为视角[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2016(23): 171-174. |
[15] | 麻怡慧. 夫妻一方侵权之债的清偿研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东政法大学,2023. |
[16] | 吴欣雨. 《民法典》视野下夫妻一方侵权之债的债务承担研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2023. |
[17] | 崔丹. 共同负担清偿规则的理论分析与建构——以《妇女权益保障法》修改为目标[J]. 中华女子学院学报, 2021(5): 32. |
[18] | 操盈盈. 夫妻一方对外侵权之债的责任认定研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 江西财经大学, 2022. |