行政诉讼中利害关系的认定——以某业主委员会诉某卫生健康局撤销医疗机构执业许可证案为例
Identification of Interests in Administrative Litigation—Taking the Case of a Certain Homeowners Committee Suing a Certain Health Bureau for Revoking a Medical Institution’s Practice License as an Example

行政诉讼中“利害关系人”也具有原告主体资格，但是法律中并未明确规定“利害关系”的含义，为实务中利害关系判断设下难题。最高人民法院在判例中引入保护性规范原则，强调行政诉讼中的利害关系，必须是当事人公法上的权益受到行政行为的损害，才构成利害关系。本文以某业主委员会诉某卫生健康局撤销医疗机构执业许可证案件为例，结合保护性规范的认定、判断标准、扩大解释等内容，解析行政诉讼中利害关系的认定标准。
In administrative litigation, “interested parties” also have the qualification of the plaintiff, but the meaning of “interest relationship” is not clearly defined in the law, which poses difficulties for the judgment of interest relationship in practice. The Supreme People’s Court has introduced the principle of protective norms in its precedents, emphasizing that in administrative litigation, the interests of the parties must be harmed by administrative actions in public law in order to constitute an interest relationship. This article takes the case of a certain homeowners committee suing a certain health bureau for revoking the practice license of a medical institution as an example, and combines the recognition, judgment standards, and expanded interpretation of protective norms to analyze the recognition standards of interests in administrative litigation.