|
基于评价模型的受服务对象视角下时间银行互助养老模式优化
|
Abstract:
本研究选择时间银行这一新兴的互助养老模式作为研究对象,从受服务对象视角出发,基于对南京市互助时间这一符合时间银行运行模式的互助养老体系进行的实地问卷调研,深入了解其发展脉络,以期精准提出优化路径,助力养老事业繁荣。本研究共回收受服务对象有效问卷253份,信效度良好。利用SERVQUAL模型评估现状服务质量,得到南京市互助时间服务质量水平总体较高,但有形性方面尚未满足期待;利用IPA-Kano模型将时间银行的各服务要素进行分类,指出基础要素建设较为完善,但如“志愿者是否具有专业设备”、“老人健康医疗护理服务需求满足程度”这类关键性绩效型要素仍需进一步改善。基于以上研究结论提炼建议:加大力度完善硬件建设、激发志愿者付出意义感、提升医疗护理服务热情、继续探索时间保障机制。
This study takes the emerging mutual assistance elderly care system, known as the Time Bank, as the research object, from the perspective of service recipients, based on a field survey conducted within the Mutual Assistance Time system in Nanjing, a mutual pension system that conforms to the operation model of the Time Bank, to gain an in-depth understanding of its development trajectory to accurately propose optimization paths and contribute to the prosperity of elderly care services. A total of 253 valid questionnaires from service recipients were collected, demonstrating good reliability and validity. Using the SERVQUAL model to evaluate the current service quality, it was found that the overall service quality level of the Mutual Assistance Time in Nanjing is relatively high, but the tangibility aspect does not yet meet expectations. The IPA-Kano model was used to classify various service elements of the Time Bank, revealing that while the foundational elements are well-established, key performance factors such as “Whether volunteers have professional equipment” and “The degree to which elderly health and medical care needs are met” should be the focus of future improvements. Based on these findings, the study suggests the following: intensifying efforts to improve hardware infrastructure, inspiring volunteers with a sense of purpose, enhancing enthusiasm for medical care services, and continuing to explore time guarantee mechanisms.
[1] | 王亚婷, 曹梅娟. 时间银行互助养老模式的概念及其关键要素[J]. 护理研究, 2017, 31(20): 2453-2455. |
[2] | 高新宇, 周静舒. 时间银行互助养老模式的运行机理与优化策略——基于社会交换理论视角[J]. 河北农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 25(1): 30-39. |
[3] | Simon, M. (2004) On Becoming a Time Broker. Fairshares. |
[4] | Perez-Vega, R. and Miguel, C. (2022) Time Banks in the United Kingdom: An Examination of the Evolution. In: Česnuitytė, V., Klimczuk, A., Miguel, C. and Avram, G., Eds., The Sharing Economy in Europe, Springer, 325-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86897-0_15 |
[5] | TimeBank (2023) Who We Are. https://timebank.org.uk/about/who-we-are/ |
[6] | Timebanking United Kingdom (TBUK) (2017) Calculating the Social Value of Person to Person Timebanking. https://timebanking.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/6.-Barnet-SROI-impact-report-2017.pdf |
[7] | 罗杨梅. 中部农村“时间银行”案例分析研究——以河南省新乡市凤泉区五陵村时间银行为例[J]. 中国集体经济, 2022(25): 15-17. |
[8] | 杨康, 沈苏燕, 李放. 农村“时间银行”互助养老困境及其价值实现路径——基于“结构-行动”分析框架的探索[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 22(6): 102-111. |
[9] | 胡斌, 韩鑫, 温宗良, 等. 徐州市农村老年人时间银行互助养老参与意愿及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2023, 39(3): 384-388. |
[10] | 丁志宏, 杜书然, 裴臻. 城市退休健康老年人参与“时间银行”的意愿及其影响因素[J]. 人口与社会, 2018, 34(2): 33-44. |
[11] | 张宝怡, 杜芊芊, 廖海芬, 龚霓, 张美芬. 我国城市社区老年人时间银行互助照护模式参与意愿影响因素的研究进展[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2022, 38(21): 1669-1673. |
[12] | 曾粤亮, 陆欣仪. 基于SERVQUAL模型的高校图书馆创客空间服务质量评价研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2023, 41(3): 51-62. |
[13] | 顾润德, 任婕, 陈媛媛. 高校图书馆学生志愿服务参与意愿的影响因素、作用机制与提升路径[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2022(6): 16-23, 30. |
[14] | 余庆泽, 杨玉国, 毛为慧, 等. 基于SERVQUAL模型的科技金融平台服务质量评测研究——以P2P网贷平台为例[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(11): 113-121. |
[15] | Kakar, A.K. (2020) Investigating Factors That Promote Time Banking for Sustainable Community Based Socio-Economic Growth and Development. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, Article ID: 105623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.034 |
[16] | Kim, H.-K. (2019) Exploring Social Innovation and Time Bank: Focus on the Elderly Healthcare in the Gangwon Province. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 8, 208-237. https://doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2019.8.2.208 |