|
人工智能生成内容的作品资格认定及权利归属探究
|
Abstract:
人工智能以其强大的算法设计以及应用规则,一经问世,便得到广泛运用与讨论。目前,学界与实务界对于人工智能生成内容的属性认定即其是否受到著作权法的保护及生成内容的权利归属这些问题仍然存在争议。法律的特征之一就是存在滞后性,在现行的知识产权体系下,已经无法很好地回应人工智能领域的这些主要问题。无救济则无权利,通过探讨人工智能生成内容的可版权性、权利归属两大前沿热点问题,有助于填补知识产权现有规范框架下的漏洞,且在人工智能高速发展的背景下,起到对相关创新领域的保护和引导作用。
Artificial intelligence, with its powerful algorithm design and application rules, has been widely used and discussed as soon as it comes out. At present, there are still controversies in academia and practice on the determination of the attributes of AI-generated content, that is, whether it is protected by the Copyright Law and the ownership of the rights of the generated content. One of the characteristics of the law is that there is a lag, and under the current IP system, it is no longer able to respond well to these major issues in the field of artificial intelligence. By discussing the copyrightability and ownership of AI-generated content, it will help fill the loopholes in the existing regulatory framework of intellectual property, and play a role in protecting and guiding related innovation fields in the context of the rapid development of AI.
[1] | 张新宝, 卞龙. 人工智能生成内容的著作权保护研究[J]. 比较法研究, 2024(2): 77-91. |
[2] | 吴汉东. 人工智能生成作品的著作权法之问[J]. 中外法学, 2020, 32(3): 653-673. |
[3] | 杨利华. 人工智能生成物著作权问题探究[J]. 现代法学, 2021, 41(4): 102-114. |
[4] | 刁佳星, 冯晓青. 人工智能生成内容的著作权法问题——分析框架与纾解方案[J]. 河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 49(2): 137-149. |
[5] | 刘银良. 论人工智能作品的著作权法地位[J]. 政治与法律, 2020(3): 2-13. |
[6] | 朱阁. “AI文生图”的法律属性与权利归属研究[J]. 知识产权, 2024(1): 24-35. |
[7] | 方夜晗. 人工智能生成物版权保护国际比较法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2023. |
[8] | 付继存. 著作权法上独创性概念的澄清与重释[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 38(2): 136-144. |
[9] | Ginsburg, J.C. (2003) The Concept of Authorship in Comparative Copyright Law. DePaul Law Review, 52, 1063-1092. |
[10] | 王迁. 再论人工智能生成的内容在著作权法中的定性[J]. 政法论坛, 2023, 41(4): 16-33. |
[11] | 孙正樑. 人工智能生成内容的著作权问题探析[J]. 清华法学, 2019, 13(6): 190-204. |
[12] | 吴汉东, 刘鑫. 生成式人工智能的知识产权法律因应与制度创新[J]. 科技与法律(中英文), 2024(1): 1-10. |
[13] | 朱梦云. 人工智能生成物的著作权归属制度设计[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(1): 118-126. |