|
新教伦理与资本主义精神的亲和与分离——韦伯视域下的资本主义社会危机分析
|
Abstract:
韦伯在对新教伦理与资本主义关系的分析中,流露出对现代社会发展前景的担忧。韦伯认为,宗教理性对盈利欲的束缚与自制,同时也是一个伦理对经济的规定,如果失去了这一伦理原则,就会激化社会的内部矛盾。宗教理性对贪欲的束缚与自制,同时也是一个伦理对经济的规定,如果失去了这一伦理原则,就会激化社会的内部矛盾。在他看来,资本主义的发展已经脱离了宗教理性对盈利欲的束缚与自制,继而导致了现代社会的分裂与人的异化。对这一社会问题的解决,可分为两条基本思路:一是韦伯、托尼等人的集体主义方案,二是彼得·辛格、温特等人的个人主义方案。本文以前者为基本立场,从分析资本主义精神的概念出发,论述新教理性在资本主义发展的作用,以及这一危机的可能原因和解决出路。
In his analysis of the relationship between the Protestant ethic and capitalism, Weber reveals his concern for the future of modern society. Weber argued that religious rationality’s restraint and self-control over the desire for profit was also an ethical restriction for the economy. The loss of this ethical principle would exacerbate internal social tensions. In his view, the development of capitalism had already detached from the restraint and self-control of religious rationality over the desire for profit, which subsequently led to the fragmentation of modern society and the alienation of individuals. The resolution of this social issue can be divided into two basic approaches: one is the collectivist approach advocated by Weber and Tonny, and the other is the individualist approach proposed by Peter Singer and Winter. This article takes the former as its basic stance, starting from an analysis of the concept of the spirit of capitalism, discussing the role of Protestant rationality in the development of capitalism, as well as the possible causes of this crisis and the way out for its solution.
[1] | 马克斯∙韦伯. 民族国家与经济政策[M]. 甘阳, 译. 北京: 生活∙读书∙新知三联书店, 1997. |
[2] | 理查德·亨利·托尼. 宗教与资本主义的兴起[M]. 赵月瑟, 夏镇平, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2006. |
[3] | 彼得∙辛格. 行最大的善——实效利他主义改变我们的生活[M]. 陈玮, 姜雪竹, 译. 北京: 生活∙读书∙新知三联书店, 2019. |
[4] | Winter, J.A. (1974) Elective Affinities between Religious Beliefs and Ideologies of Management in Two Eras. American Journal of Sociology, 79, 1134-1150. https://doi.org/10.1086/225674 |
[5] | Weber, M. (2016). Die Protestantische Ethik und der “Geisit” des Kapitalismus. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. |
[6] | Weber, M. (1950) General Economic History. The Free Press. |
[7] | 亚当∙斯密. 国民财富的性质和原因的研究(下) [M]. 郭大力, 王亚南, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2009. |
[8] | 洪涛. 韦伯与马克思——“论文化-政治”与“经济-社会” [J]. 当代国外马克思主义评论, 2002(1): 198-226, 343-344. |
[9] | Colvin, C.L. and McCracken, M. (2016) Work Ethic, Social Ethic, No Ethic: Measuring the Economic Values of Modern Christians. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 32, 1043-1053. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2543 |
[10] | 马克思恩格斯文集(第八卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009. |
[11] | 李文华. 社会规律的狡计: 马克思论证“资产阶级必然灭亡”的方法及其意义(上) [J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2012(3): 29-32. |
[12] | Mackinnon, M.H. (2001) Max Weber’s Disenchantment: lineages of Kant and Channing. Journal of Classical Sociology, 1, 329-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687950122232576 |
[13] | Anter, A. (2014) Max Weber’s Theory of the Modern State: Origins, Structure and Significance. Palgrave Macmillan. |
[14] | 李剑. 权力政治与文化斗争——韦伯的国家观[J]. 上海行政学院学报, 2009, 10(2): 49-55. |
[15] | 哈特穆特·莱曼, 京特·罗特. 韦伯的新教伦理——由来、根据和背景[M]. 阎克文, 译. 沈阳: 辽宁教育出版社, 2001. |
[16] | 田耕. 民族与政治共同体的关系: 从“弗莱堡演讲”到“经济与社会”的两条思路[J]. 社会, 2020, 40(6): 1-30. |
[17] | 周福. 人的政治理性化: 马克斯·韦伯的政治教育思想探究[J]. 理论观察, 2010(2): 31-32. |
[18] | 艾伦∙帕尔默. 夹缝中的六国——维也纳会议以来的中东欧历史[M]. 于亚伦, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1997. |
[19] | 尼采. 尼采文集——权力意志卷[M]. 周国平, 译. 西宁: 青海人民出版社, 1995. |
[20] | 熊跃根. 马克斯∙韦伯的政治理念与变革时代的社会政策对理解当代中国的启示[J]. 社会学评论, 2020, 8(1): 51-71. |