护理干预在新生儿红臀护理中的应用及效果研究
Study on the Application and Effect of Nursing Intervention in Neonatal Red Buttock Nursing

目的：探讨在新生儿红臂护理中应用护理干预的临床效果。方法：本研究主要的研究对象选取于本院收治的新生儿红臂患者，共计90例，2022年1月至2023年1月为选取时间，总结所有新生儿的临床资料，并进行系统录入和划分，完成对比小组的建立，分组依据平均原则，每个小组分得45名新生儿。其中一组命名为研究组，使用综合护理干预。另一小组命名为参照组，采用常规护理方法。护理干预期间应用的方法存在差异，会产生不同的效果，因此对临床护理效果进行对比。对护理后的有效情况进行分析，记录护理后不同程度新生儿红臂的消退时间，同时观察临床治疗效果，记录两组护理满意度及护理后新生儿红臂的发生情况。结果：对护理后不同程度的红臂消退时间进行观察，研究组消退时间均低于参照组，存在明显差异和统计学意义(P < 0.05)。研究组接受综合护理干预后总有效率(97.77%) > 常规护理的参照组(84.44%)，存在明显的差异和统计学意义(P < 0.05)。护理后评价新生儿清洁、环境护理、基本指导和母乳喂养干预等方面的满意度，研究组各项满意度评分均高于参照组，差异显著有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论：在新生儿红臂护理中应用综合护理干预方法能够有效地提高临床效果，使家属满意度得到提高，还能够减少红臂的发生率，值得借鉴。
Objective: To explore the clinical effect of nursing intervention in neonatal red arm nursing. Methods: The main research objects of this study were 90 newborns with red arms in our hospital. From January 2022 to January 2023, the clinical data of all newborns were summarized, systematically entered and divided, and the comparison group was established. According to the principle of average, each group was assigned 45 newborns. One group was named as the research group and used comprehensive nursing intervention. The other group was named as the reference group, and the routine nursing methods were adopted. There are differences in the methods used during nursing intervention, which will produce different effects, so the clinical nursing effects are compared. The effective situation after nursing was analyzed, and the fading time of neonatal red arm in different degrees after nursing was recorded. At the same time, the clinical treatment effect was observed, and the nursing satisfaction of the two groups and the occurrence of neonatal red arm after nursing were recorded. Results: Observing the fading time of red arm in different degrees after nursing, the fading time of the study group was lower than that of the reference group, with obvious differences and statistical significance (P < 0.05). The total effective rate of the study group after comprehensive nursing intervention (97.77%) was higher than that of the conventional nursing reference group (84.44%). There are obvious differences and statistical significance (P < 0.05). After nursing, the satisfaction of newborn cleaning, environmental care, basic guidance and breastfeeding intervention was evaluated. The satisfaction scores of the study group were higher than those of the reference group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).