全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

“双碳”目标下我国航运企业减排策略研究
Research on Emission Reduction Strategies for Chinese Shipping Companies under the “Dual Carbon” Goals

DOI: 10.12677/sd.2024.148220, PP. 1911-1917

Keywords: “双碳”,航运企业,碳排放,减排策略
“Dual Carbon”
, Shipping Companies, Carbon Emissions, Emission Reduction Strategies

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

航运业是全球贸易运输的支柱,近年来中国航运企业承担的货物运输量持续增长,伴随产生的碳排放量显著增加。作为世界第一碳排放大国,中国政府在巴黎协定等国际协议中做出了温室气体减排承诺,并提出了2030年前实现碳达峰、2060年实现碳中和的关键性锚点。本文深入分析了国内外航运企业减排政策,并解读了我国航运企业减排的现状和存在的挑战。通过阐释“双碳”目标的内涵与对航运业的深远影响,本文探讨了航运企业应对“双碳”目标的减排策略,结论部分综合分析了航运企业实施这些策略的可行性与长远意义,为推动航运业绿色发展贡献了可行建议。
The shipping industry is the backbone of global trade transportation, and in recent years, the volume of cargo transported by Chinese shipping companies has continuously increased, leading to a significant rise in carbon emissions. As the world’s largest emitter of carbon dioxide, the Chinese government has committed to greenhouse gas reduction targets in international agreements such as the Paris Agreement, and has set critical milestones to achieve peak carbon emissions by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060. This paper conducts an in-depth analysis of emission reduction policies for shipping companies both domestically and internationally, and examines the current status and challenges faced by Chinese shipping companies in reducing emissions. By elucidating the implications of the “dual carbon” goals and their profound impact on the shipping industry, this paper explores emission reduction strategies for shipping companies to meet these targets. The conclusion section provides a comprehensive analysis of the feasibility and long-term significance of the implementation of these strategies by shipping companies, offering practical recommendations to support the green development of the shipping industry.

References

[1]  蒋军, 杨琛, 陈丽璇, 等. “双碳”目标下航运企业碳减排的三方演化博弈分析[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2023, 41(6): 152-160.
[2]  梁晶, 张霖, 刘禹轩. 考虑碳排放政策的港航企业减排策略研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 39-47.
[3]  Buhaug, Ø., Corbett, J.J., Endresen, Ø., et al. (2009) Second IMO GHG study 2009. International Maritime Organization (IMO), London.
[4]  Environment Protection Committee (2014) Third IMO GHG Study 2014.
[5]  周玲玲, 顾阿伦, 叶薇倩, 等. 中国未来国际海运碳排放量预测[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 52(8): 1125-1129.
[6]  Bouman, E.A., Lindstad, E., Rialland, A.I. and Strømman, A.H. (2017) State-of-the-Art Technologies, Measures, and Potential for Reducing GHG Emissions from Shipping—A Review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 408-421.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022
[7]  Lindstad, H. and Eskeland, G.S. (2015) Low Carbon Maritime Transport: How Speed, Size and Slenderness Amounts to Substantial Capital Energy Substitution. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 41, 244-256.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.10.006
[8]  Burel, F., Taccani, R. and Zuliani, N. (2013) Improving Sustainability of Maritime Transport through Utilization of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) for Propulsion. Energy, 57, 412-420.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.002
[9]  Kirstein, L., Halim, R. and Merk, O. (2018) Decarbonizing Maritime Transport: Pathways to Zero-Carbon Shipping by 2035.
[10]  涂环. 清洁能源船用适应性综合分析[J]. 中国船检, 2022(1): 58-62.
[11]  邢辉, 李想. 船用替代燃料应用进展[J]. 世界海运, 2023, 46(2): 16-24.
[12]  Balcombe, P., Brierley, J., Lewis, C., et al. (2019) How to Decarbonise International Shipping: Options for Fuels, Technologies and Policies. Energy Conversion and Management, 182, 72-88.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.080

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133