|
Modern Linguistics 2024
以学习效果为中心的二外日语混合式教学改革与实践
|
Abstract:
为了培养具备创新思维和能力的高素质复合型外语应用人才,本研究依据“新三中心”原则(即以学生发展为中心、以学生学习为中心、以学习效果为中心),构建了以学习效果为中心的混合式课堂教学模式,并对英语专业二外日语教学进行了改革。研究确定了“五个1”套餐教学目标,并依据课程目标,从课前、课中和课后三个阶段对教学步骤和环节进行了系统设计。随后,研究团队实施了这一教学改革方案,并对其实施效果进行了评估。研究结果显示,以学习为中心的课堂活动显著提高了学生在小组合作学习中的参与度,增强了师生互动的效率,取得了良好的教学效果,实现了教学效果和学生学习积极性的同步提升。同时,学生的自主学习能力和沟通合作能力也有所提高。
In order to cultivate highly qualified applied talents in foreign language with innovative thinking and abilities, based on the “new three-centered” principle of student development, student learning, and learning outcomes, this study constructs a hybrid classroom teaching centered on learning outcomes and reforms the teaching of Japanese as a second foreign language in English major. It establishes the “Five Ones” teaching objectives, and based on the course objectives, redesigns the steps and links of course teaching in three stages: pre-class, in-class, and post-class. Then, it implements the teaching reform plan and evaluates the implementation effect. The research results show that the student-centered classroom activities enable students to participate better in cooperative group learning, and the interaction between teachers and students is more efficient, achieving good teaching results and synchronously improving teaching effectiveness and student learning enthusiasm. Students’ abilities in autonomous learning and communication and cooperation have also been improved.
[1] | 彭吉. 二外日语课程的分层教学研究[J]. 内江科技, 2020, 41(6): 80-81. |
[2] | 侯丽颖. 小组学习模式在教学实践中的应用——以大学二外日语为例[J]. 日语学习与研究, 2013(5): 116-121. |
[3] | 韩冰, 江春华. 综合大学二外日语教育研究[J]. 日语学习与研究, 2013(4): 88-94. |
[4] | 易洪艳. “90后”英语专业本科生学习二外日语的现状调查及启示[J]. 新西部, 2020(08): 47-48+44. |
[5] | 郑倩. 从“文化自信”角度谈二外日语课程思政教学改革[J]. 湖北开放职业学院学报, 2022, 35(3): 102-103+122. |
[6] | 张娟丽. 二外日语课程思政内容体系构建及实施研究——以张家口学院为例[J]. 品位·经典, 2023(13): 166-169. |
[7] | 张桃. 混合教学模式下思政教育融入二外日语教学研究[J]. 成才之路, 2022(10): 103-105. |
[8] | 刘义翠. 基于教育信息化的二外日语混合式课程改革与实践[J]. 济宁学院学报, 2022, 43(5): 91-97. |
[9] | 赵炬明. 论新三中心: 概念与历史——美国SC本科教学改革研究之一[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2016(3): 35-56. |