|
Finance 2024
ESG表现、企业债务期限错配与融资约束
|
Abstract:
随着全球对可持续发展的关注度逐年提升,作为可持续发展理念在企业层面的映射,企业ESG表现亦受到各界的广泛关注和讨论。利用2009~2022年我国沪深A股非金融类上市公司数据探究企业ESG表现对债务期限错配程度的影响。研究结果表明企业ESG表现有助于缓解企业债务期限结构“短债长用”错配的程度,并且社会责任和公司治理维度能够更有效缓解企业债务期限错配程度。机制分析显示,ESG表现主要通过缓解融资约束对企业债务期限错配起抑制作用。异质性分析显示,ESG表现对企业债务期限错配程度的缓解作用在非国有企业和传统企业中更加显著。
With the global attention to sustainable development increasing year by year, corporate ESG performance, as a mapping of the concept of sustainable development at the corporate level, has also received extensive attention and discussion from all walks of life. This paper examines the impact of corporate ESG performance on the degree of debt maturity mismatch, using the data of China’s A-share non-financial listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2009 to 2022. The findings reveal that corporate ESG performance can help alleviate the degree of “short-term debt and long-term debt” mismatch in corporate debt maturity structure. Moreover, the social responsibility and corporate governance dimensions can more effectively alleviate the degree of corporate debt maturity mismatch. The mechanism analysis demonstrates that ESG performance mainly inhibits corporate debt maturity mismatch by alleviating financing constraints. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the mitigating effect of ESG performance on the extent of corporate debt maturity mismatch is more pronounced among non-state-owned firms and traditional firms.
[1] | 方先明, 胡丁. 企业ESG表现与创新——来自A股上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(2): 91-106. |
[2] | 黄世忠. ESG视角下价值创造的三大变革[J]. 财务研究, 2021(6): 3-14. |
[3] | 李常青, 狄然. ESG表现能缓解企业投融资期限错配吗? [J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 73(5): 30-42. |
[4] | 钱明, 徐光华, 沈弋. 社会责任信息披露、会计稳健性与融资约束——基于产权异质性的视角[J]. 会计研究, 2016(5): 9-17+95. |
[5] | 吴红军, 刘啟仁, 吴世农. 公司环保信息披露与融资约束[J]. 世界经济, 2017, 40(5): 124-127. |
[6] | 张宏, 王宇婷, 林慧. 内外双“管”下ESG表现对企业融资成本的影响研究[J]. 产业经济评论, 2024(1): 41-56. |
[7] | Myers, S.C. (1977) Determinants of Corporate Borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 147-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0 |
[8] | 刘海明, 李明明. 货币政策对微观企业的经济效应再检验——基于贷款期限结构视角的研究[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(2): 117-132. |
[9] | 钟凯, 程小可, 张伟华. 货币政策适度水平与企业“短贷长投”之谜[J]. 管理世界, 2016(3): 87-98. |
[10] | 刘晓光, 刘元春. 杠杆率、短债长用与企业表现[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(7): 127-141. |
[11] | 白云霞, 邱穆青, 李伟. 投融资期限错配及其制度解释——来自中美两国金融市场的比较[J]. 中国工业经济, 2016(7): 23-39. |
[12] | 李杨. 银保合作视角下破解农村中小企业融资问题的思考[J]. 农业经济, 2014(4): 41-43. |
[13] | 李诗, 黄世忠. 从CSR到ESG的演进——文献回顾与未来展望[J]. 财务研究, 2022(4): 13-25. |
[14] | Drempetic, S., Klein, C. and Zwergel, B. (2020) The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings under Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 333-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1 |
[15] | Huang, D.Z.-X. (2022) Environmental, Social and Governance Factors and Assessing Firm Value: Valuation, Signalling and Stakeholder Perspectives. Accounting & Finance, 62, 1983-2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12849 |
[16] | 邱牧远, 殷红. 生态文明建设背景下企业ESG表现与融资成本[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019, 36(3): 108-123. |
[17] | 李逸飞, 李茂林, 李静. 银行金融科技、信贷配置与企业短债长用[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(10): 137-154. |
[18] | Diamond, D.W. (1991) Debt Maturity Structure and Liquidity Risk. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 709-737. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937924 |
[19] | Rajan, R.G. (1992) Insiders and Outsiders: The Choice between Informed and Arm’s-Length Debt. The Journal of Finance, 47, 1367-1400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04662.x |
[20] | 李增福, 陈俊杰, 连玉君, 等. 经济政策不确定性与企业短债长用[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(1): 77-89+143. |
[21] | Bushee, B.J. (1998) The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior. The Accounting Review, 73, 305-333. |
[22] | Burns, N., Kedia, S. and Lipson, M. (2010) Institutional Ownership and Monitoring: Evidence from Financial Misreporting. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16, 443-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.06.001 |
[23] | Bushee, B.J. (2001) Do Institutional Investors Prefer Near-Term Earnings over Long-Run Value? Contemporary Accounting Research, 18, 207-246. https://doi.org/10.1092/J4GU-BHWH-8HME-LE0X |
[24] | 高杰英, 褚冬晓, 廉永辉, 等. ESG表现能改善企业投资效率吗? [J]. 证券市场导报, 2021(11): 24-34+72. |
[25] | Azmi, W., Hassan, M.K., Houston, R., et al. (2021) ESG Activities and Banking Performance: International Evidence from Emerging Economies. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 70, Article 101277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2020.101277 |
[26] | 武鹏, 杨科, 蒋峻松, 等. 企业ESG表现会影响盈余价值相关性吗? [J]. 财经研究, 2023, 49(6): 137-152. |
[27] | 于忠泊, 田高良, 齐保垒, 等. 媒体关注的公司治理机制——基于盈余管理视角的考察[J]. 管理世界, 2011(9): 127-140. |
[28] | 马榕, 石晓军. 中国债券信用评级结果具有甄别能力吗?——基于盈余管理敏感性的视角[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2016, 15(1): 197-216. |
[29] | Zhang, F., Lai, X. and Guo, C. (2024) ESG Disclosure and Investment-Financing Maturity Mismatch: Evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance, 70, Article 102312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102312 |
[30] | 江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5): 100-120. |
[31] | 魏志华, 曾爱民, 李博. 金融生态环境与企业融资约束——基于中国上市公司的实证研究[J]. 会计研究, 2014(5): 73-80+95. |
[32] | 马红, 侯贵生, 王元月. 产融结合与我国企业投融资期限错配——基于上市公司经验数据的实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, 21(3): 46-53. |
[33] | 宁金辉, 王敏. 绿色债券能缓解企业“短融长投”吗?——来自债券市场的经验证据[J]. 证券市场导报, 2021(9): 48-59. |
[34] | 梁上坤, 姜艳峰, 陈艳利. 国有资本授权经营与融资效率改进[J]. 中国经济学, 2023(2): 223-260. |
[35] | 孙献贞. 数字化转型、政府补助与企业技术创新——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 南方金融, 2023(7): 3-15. |
[36] | 许林, 唐璐, 徐玉发. 数字化转型、创新活力对企业融资约束的缓释效应[J]. 南方金融, 2023(11): 3-18. |